The standard investment deduction for SMEs is back

As we all know, Belgium is a country of SMEs, and in these difficult economic times, SMEs need extra support. To encourage SMEs in their investment policies, the legislature has dusted off the standard investment deduction for company tax, which has been frozen since 2007. For 2014 and 2015 investments, a temporary investment deduction of 4% was introduced. Because the standard investment deduction cannot be combined with the deduction for risk capital, and because of the low deduction percentage, the former was not often used.

To address these issues, the legislature has made the investment deduction permanent for investments made on or after 1 January 2016, and raised the deduction percentage to 8%. As a result, it has turned this "new" measure into a useful planning tool.

1. The concept

As the name suggests, the standard investment deduction applies to tangible and intangible fixed assets, regardless of their nature. This includes capitalised borrowing costs (relating to capital borrowed for the construction of fixed assets), improvements to existing buildings (insofar as no recovered materials were used) and non-recoverable VAT. It is a one-off deduction of 8% that is applied to the purchase price or production cost of the asset in the financial year of purchase or production. So an investment of €100,000, for example, attracts a deduction of €8,000, which can be offset against the taxable result.

If the deduction cannot be fully used, it is transferable to the next taxable period. Note: In this respect the standard investment deduction differs from the specific investment deductions which apply to things like energy-saving investments, investments for research and development, etc. For the deductions for specific investments provided by law, there is no time limit on transferability.

2. Conditions

  • The legislature has placed several conditions on the application of the standard investment deduction:
  • The company must be a SME within the meaning of Article 15 of the Companies Code;
  • The fixed assets must be used for business activities in Belgium;
  • The investments must be made in depreciable tangible and intangible fixed assets (i.e. not land, paintings, etc.);
  • The assets must be acquired new or be newly-made;
  • The depreciation must be spread over at least three taxable periods.

To claim the investment deduction, taxpayers must submit Form 275U (company income tax) or 276U (personal income tax) along with their return.

3. Exclusions

To prevent tax abuse, the legislature has formulated several specific exclusions.

1) Fixed assets that are not exclusively used for business activities in Belgium

The legislature has stressed that the assets must be directly related to the existing or planned economic activities actually carried on by the company. This means that it is not enough that the investment falls within the company’s corporate purpose. Furthermore, fixed assets whose value would be deducted when calculating the risk capital deduction are, for the purpose of the investment deduction, deemed not to relate to the company’s economic activities. In the Explanatory Memorandum for the introduction of the temporary 4% investment deduction, the example was given of a partnership of doctors which cannot apply the investment deduction for the purchase of a seaside apartment. Even if the corporate purpose allows for or describes such investments, or if a benefit in kind is applied for the use of such investments, the deduction still cannot be applied.

Investments in fixed assets of which the cost unreasonably exceeds the needs of the business are also excluded. What is considered to be ‘unreasonable’ is of course a question of fact, the assessment of which may depend on what business activities the company carries on, the financial results it achieves, etc.

Fixed assets used for private purposes as well as business activities are not eligible for the investment deduction. A common example is that of an immovable asset which is partly used as a residence. In such a case the investment deduction may be applied only in relation to the rooms and spaces that are used exclusively for business purposes and are separated from the private areas. If for example you had improvements carried out on your house, it would be best to have a separate invoice prepared for the work relating to the rooms used exclusively for business purposes, such as a consulting room or office.

2) Fixed assets that are acquired or made with the intention of transferring the right to use them to a third party through leasing, long leasing, superficiary rights or similar property rights

This exclusion only relates to situations where the fixed assets are in principle depreciable by the rights holder. For example, a leasing contract under which the leased property is depreciable by the lessee and not by the lessor. This exclusion prevents the lessor from applying the investment deduction, which is a right reserved for the lessee (provided the other conditions are met).

3) Fixed assets, the use of which is ceded to third parties in a manner other than those described above

In the past, the Constitutional Court found this exclusion discriminatory because the funds were not equal to their purpose. As a result, the legislature mitigated the exclusion by stating that fixed assets would be eligible for the investment deduction to the extent that their use was ceded to a natural person or SME which could then itself claim the investment deduction as if it was the owner of the property. This was an attempt to prevent taxpayers who are eligible for the deduction being tempted to purchase fixed assets then hire them out to taxpayers who fall outside the scope of this measure, such as large enterprises.

The administrative guidelines give several examples of this exclusion, such as letting rooms to students.

4) Private cars and cars with a dual use

With the exception of cars belonging to a driving school which are used exclusively for that activity and cars that are exclusively used for a taxi service or are hired with a driver.

5) Buildings acquired with the intention to re-sell (inventory)

6) Additional charges, if not depreciated together with the assets to which they relate

4. The standard investment deduction as a tax planning tool

It should be noted that the standard investment deduction cannot be combined with the deduction for risk capital, (i.e. the notional interest deduction). Since the standard investment deduction has been increased to 8% and the rate of the deduction for risk capital is going down each year (for the 2017 assessment year, it’s only 1.631% for SMEs), it’s a good time to consider which measure is the best one to use.

Let’s illustrate it with a simple example:

Company A is a medical partnership whose financial year closes on 31 December. In 2015 it ended the financial year with equity capital of €400,000. In 2016 they purchased new medical equipment worth €120,000. The question is whether in its tax return for the 2017 assessment year (for the financial year ending 31 December 2016), it would be better for Company A to apply the deduction for risk capital, as it has done in previous years, or whether it should instead apply the standard investment deduction.

On the hypothesis that the basis for the risk capital deduction for Company A is equal to the initial state of its equity capital, the notional interest deduction would amount to €6,524 (i.e. €400,000 x 1.631%).

The standard investment deduction would produce €9,600 (i.e. €120,000.00 x 8%). Accordingly, applying the standard investment deduction would be best in this case.

However, it should be noted that the above exercise does not tell the whole story, since the order of the tax deductions must also be taken into account. The standard investment deduction is the second-to-last deduction that can be applied on the list of company income tax deductions:

1) Non-taxable items

2) Definitively-taxed income and exempt income from movable property

3) Deduction for patent income

4) Deduction for risk capital

5) Losses carried forward

6) Investment deduction

7) Deduction for risk capital transferred from the previous taxable period

For example, if the deduction for tax losses carried forward is available, this will be used first, before the standard investment deduction is offset against the taxable result. Since there is a time limit on the transferability of tax losses carried forward, in some cases it may be more useful (usually if the difference between the deduction for risk capital and the standard investment deduction is not too large) to opt for the risk capital deduction instead.

Let’s go back to the earlier example, and suppose that Company A’s taxable result before the application of tax deductions is €14,600. It also has €20,000 of tax losses carried forward from previous years.

Despite the fact that the standard investment deduction is higher than the deduction for risk capital, in this situation it would be better to use the risk capital deduction. Because of the order in which the deductions are applied, by opting for the risk capital deduction Company A would only have to use €8,076 (i.e. €14,600 - €6,524) of the losses carried forward. If they had applied the standard investment deduction, the full amount would have been cancelled out by the losses carried forward.

Note that the above exclusion does not affect any transferred risk capital deduction which has already been built up in the past. The exclusion applies only to the risk capital deduction for the current assessment year in which the standard investment deduction is applied.

5. Conclusion

In summary, the standard investment deduction is a useful measure which should not be overlooked when planning new investments. While the deduction for risk capital often provides a small tax benefit for SMEs with limited equity capital, the investment deduction gives taxpayers a significant tax saving of up to 8% of the amount of their investment. If you’re looking for assistance, we are at your disposal to provide further advice and work out a tax simulation as soon as you start thinking about making an investment.

Authors: Mark Joris and Amber Van Landeghem

Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and
The 'use and enjoyment" rules explained
Freight transport and closely associated services: new rules clarified in a circular
On 31 October 2017, (previous) Royal Decree No 57, which deals with the freight transport services Department and related services, was replaced by a new RD which came into force on 23 November 2017. It clarifies the former RD in part while introducing a new rule. In order to clarify and discuss the (new) rules, the tax authorities published an administrative circular in this regard on 31 May 2018
Guidelines
Substantial changes in the obligations for partnerships
The Company Law Reform, published on 27 April 2018, is making a number of changes in the Companies Code and the Code of Economic Law. These new regulations will enter into force on 1 November 2018. A few rules will also change for partnerships. Although some clarifications will still be published, we would already like to provide the following guidelines. Changes in the Companies Code A first
Quickly detect system risks
Without a Legal Entity Identifier your company will not be trading on the stock market in 2018
  As from 3 January 2018, every legal entity that buys or sells financial instruments must have a Legal Entity Identifier or LEI. Legal Entity Identifier A LEI is a 20-digit alpha-numeric code enabling quick identification of legal entities that are active on the (international or local) financial markets. The LEI enables regulators to quickly detect system risks. Registrati
A summary of the main points
Immovable property leases to include VAT
  Although currently there is just a draft bill on this issue, which obviously can be subject to change in the meantime, we would like to summarize the main points of the upcoming revolution in the VAT landscape: immovable property leases may become subject to VAT. History Until recently, immovable property leases have – in principle – been exempt from VAT (section 44, paragr
UBO = Ultimate Beneficial Owner
The UBO register: new disclosure requirements planned for your company’s administrative body
As a result of the insertion of sections 14(1) and 14(2) into the Belgian Companies Code all companies must in the future obtain adequate, accurate and current information about their ‘ultimate beneficial owners’ (UBOs) and record the data in the new ‘UBO Register’, a central register containing data about companies and the natural persons behind them. In view of the unwavering atte
Introduction of the matrimonial property law
Is it the end of the final set-off clause or is it getting new life?
  Much has been said about the final set-off clause in recent years. After the Court of Cassation in 2017 ruled in favour of the tax payer that the claim was deductible in the scope of the payable succession duties, the Flemish regulator decided to come to the aid of the tax authorities by changing the law. What is a final set-off clause and how does it work? Many spouses married un
Also the unequal treatment gets reviewed
Benefit in kind for housing: how to anticipate the higher or lower scenario?
Discrimination as regards the benefit in kind for housing has been highlighted on several occasions. Specifically, it relates to the unequal treatment of the same benefits, whether in terms of provision by a sole trader or provision by a legal person. In the most common cases, the benefit arising from being a limited company is almost four times more expensive taxation-wise than the benefit arisin
To reduce the financial burden
Start-up reduction on social security contributions for self-employed persons
The start-up reduction was part of the 'Summer agreement' and took effect on 1 April 2018. With this initiative, the government intends to reduce the financial burden of self-employed persons in start-ups, who often have low incomes at the start of their activity, thereby stimulating entrepreneurship.  Which self-employed persons are eligible?  The reduction measure applies to all se

Subscribe to our newsletter