Setting up a VOF has both benefits and drawbacks

A general partnership (VOF – vennootschap onder firma) is a little-regulated company type which is not often used in Belgium. In practice, people usually opt for this company type because no financial plan is necessary at the time of formation, the company can be set up via private deed (i.e. you don’t need a notary) and because you don’t have to publish annual financial statements. So why aren’t we all setting up VOFs? Well, for a few reasons.

General features of a VOF

A VOF is a company established by partners who are jointly and severally liable and who wish to carry on a civil or commercial activity together. Unlike a public or private limited company, minimal capital is legally required to set up the company. In fact, you can set up a general partnership with capital of €1. Sounds great … but on the other hand, all partners are personally jointly and severally liable for all of the partnership’s obligations – without limitation. It gets worse – you can even be held personally liable for the actions of your fellow partner(s)! In other words, your private assets are not protected if something goes wrong – whether or not you were involved – which, of course, is not so great. But this kind of protection is obtained when you set up a public or private limited company[1], which explains why these types of company are so popular.

When setting up a VOF, contributions may consist of money, goods or labour. The latter in particular can be useful if one or more of the partners has insufficient resources to contribute to the partnership but wants a balanced distribution of the partnership assets. Preferably, this form of contribution should be clearly outlined in the founding document.

A VOF must have at least two founders. After being set up, if the partnership is ever left with only one partner, it must automatically be dissolved. The founders/partners do not have to be natural persons, so one or more legal persons (other companies, non-profit associations, etc.) could be partners in a VOF.

There are almost no legal limitations on the drafting of the Articles of Association for a VOF. The Articles of Association can therefore quite easily be moulded to the wishes of the partners. For example, the partners may make mutually-acceptable arrangements concerning an unequal distribution of profits, the transferability of shares, the dissolution of the partnership, the operation of the partnership, the decision-making powers of the business manager(s), etc.

VOFs have a number of useful benefits

The main reasons to choose this company type can be summarised as follows:

  • The partnership can be set up via private deed, which means you don’t need a notary
  • The Articles of Association can be prepared in accordance with the wishes of the partners
  • In principle, shares are not transferable to third parties without the prior agreement of the other partners, so that the private nature of the partnership can be preserved
  • The partnership does not have to publish annual financial statements, which is a significant benefit for those who wish to act with complete discretion
  • No minimal capital is required to set up the partnership
  • Although money or other goods can be contributed, the contribution can also consist of labour
  • No financial plan has to be drawn up at the time of formation
  • Contributions and quasi-contributions can be done much more smoothly than in a public or private limited company, since no contribution reports have to be prepared by an auditor
  • All partners must refrain from both lawful and unlawful competition with the partnership of which they are members; if they do not, any proceeds from that competition will belong to the VOF
  • A business manager may be appointed under the Articles of Association, who will be almost impossible to dismiss unless the Articles of Association provide for dismissal by majority decision
  • There is no legal provision for a special conflict-of-interest procedure
  • In principle, all decisions must be made with the unanimous consent of all partners
  • When the partnership is dissolved, no audit report is required from an auditor or external accountant
  • The partnership can be dissolved via private deed.

As you can see, the VOF can certainly offer a number of useful benefits which only apply to a lesser extent or not at all to other company types.

VOFs also have drawbacks

The main drawbacks of a VOF are:

  • All partners are subject to unlimited joint and several liability, payable from their personal assets, for the debts of the partnership
  • In principle, the bankruptcy of the VOF would result in the bankruptcy of all of the partners
  • After being set up, if the partnership was ever left with only one partner it would automatically have to be dissolved
  • A minimum of two shareholders are required
  • Because of the limited transferability of the shares, it’s more difficult for partners to withdraw from the partnership.

When is it best to choose a VOF, and when should you not?

First and foremost, the personal, unlimited joint and several liability of the partners is a good reason for caution, and means the VOF is definitely not suitable for the more risky kinds of activities. So setting up a transport or construction company in the form of a VOF is clearly not a good idea. But this company type may be suitable for an asset management company, or to allow you to keep working after you become eligible for the pension, without the risk of losing your pension if you want to moonlight as an independent contractor.

The benefit of there being no minimum capital requirement is an advantage, but should certainly not be decisive, since you can already set up a private limited company with paid-up capital of €6,200[2] if there are several partners or €12,400 if you’re the sole shareholder. That may seem like a lot to some people, but in practice you always need several thousand euros to start a business. Private limited companies also offer the significant advantage that, in principle, your personal assets cannot be touched. Unless, of course, you have to provide a personal guarantee in order to get access to funds.

In practice, VOFs are sometimes used by persons exercising a liberal profession such as doctors, who cannot escape their professional liability in any case by carrying on their activities through a public or private limited company. If they opt for a VOF, they don’t have to draw up a financial plan, which reduces the setup costs a bit. In theory, the cost of a notary can also be avoided, but in practice the Articles of Association will have to be drafted by an accountant or bookkeeper, which in reality probably costs just as much. At least, it does if the Articles of Association are drafted with any level of expertise.

Another advantage is that your partnership does not have to publish annual financial statements each year. But that can be a drawback too, because certain creditors would still like to have some idea of the financial situation of your company, and as a result will be less inclined to do business with your partnership. And all the while, they actually possess stronger guarantees of payment, since they can tap into your personal assets if the partnership fails to satisfy their claims. There’s a certain suspicion with regard to VOFs. Limited partnerships face similar problems.

A VOF may be eminently suitable as a form of cooperation between several natural persons or companies. For example, two companies can set up a joint venture in the form of a VOF without having to comply with so many formalities, and can mould the Articles of Association to suit their specific needs.

In practice, VOFs are not often suggested as the most suitable company type for starting a business. This is in large part due to the unlimited joint and several liability. But the fact remains that this company type can be useful in certain specific situations. You should certainly not allow yourself to be swayed by the lower costs involved in such a company, because if something goes wrong, this company type could turn out to be very expensive.

[1] Apart from founder's liability
[2] Or €1 for a "starter" private limited company

Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and
The 'use and enjoyment" rules explained
Freight transport and closely associated services: new rules clarified in a circular
On 31 October 2017, (previous) Royal Decree No 57, which deals with the freight transport services Department and related services, was replaced by a new RD which came into force on 23 November 2017. It clarifies the former RD in part while introducing a new rule. In order to clarify and discuss the (new) rules, the tax authorities published an administrative circular in this regard on 31 May 2018
Guidelines
Substantial changes in the obligations for partnerships
The Company Law Reform, published on 27 April 2018, is making a number of changes in the Companies Code and the Code of Economic Law. These new regulations will enter into force on 1 November 2018. A few rules will also change for partnerships. Although some clarifications will still be published, we would already like to provide the following guidelines. Changes in the Companies Code A first
Quickly detect system risks
Without a Legal Entity Identifier your company will not be trading on the stock market in 2018
  As from 3 January 2018, every legal entity that buys or sells financial instruments must have a Legal Entity Identifier or LEI. Legal Entity Identifier A LEI is a 20-digit alpha-numeric code enabling quick identification of legal entities that are active on the (international or local) financial markets. The LEI enables regulators to quickly detect system risks. Registrati
A summary of the main points
Immovable property leases to include VAT
  Although currently there is just a draft bill on this issue, which obviously can be subject to change in the meantime, we would like to summarize the main points of the upcoming revolution in the VAT landscape: immovable property leases may become subject to VAT. History Until recently, immovable property leases have – in principle – been exempt from VAT (section 44, paragr
UBO = Ultimate Beneficial Owner
The UBO register: new disclosure requirements planned for your company’s administrative body
As a result of the insertion of sections 14(1) and 14(2) into the Belgian Companies Code all companies must in the future obtain adequate, accurate and current information about their ‘ultimate beneficial owners’ (UBOs) and record the data in the new ‘UBO Register’, a central register containing data about companies and the natural persons behind them. In view of the unwavering atte
Introduction of the matrimonial property law
Is it the end of the final set-off clause or is it getting new life?
  Much has been said about the final set-off clause in recent years. After the Court of Cassation in 2017 ruled in favour of the tax payer that the claim was deductible in the scope of the payable succession duties, the Flemish regulator decided to come to the aid of the tax authorities by changing the law. What is a final set-off clause and how does it work? Many spouses married un
Also the unequal treatment gets reviewed
Benefit in kind for housing: how to anticipate the higher or lower scenario?
Discrimination as regards the benefit in kind for housing has been highlighted on several occasions. Specifically, it relates to the unequal treatment of the same benefits, whether in terms of provision by a sole trader or provision by a legal person. In the most common cases, the benefit arising from being a limited company is almost four times more expensive taxation-wise than the benefit arisin
To reduce the financial burden
Start-up reduction on social security contributions for self-employed persons
The start-up reduction was part of the 'Summer agreement' and took effect on 1 April 2018. With this initiative, the government intends to reduce the financial burden of self-employed persons in start-ups, who often have low incomes at the start of their activity, thereby stimulating entrepreneurship.  Which self-employed persons are eligible?  The reduction measure applies to all se

Subscribe to our newsletter