Bonuses: a last-resort method of cutting your company’s tax bill

At the end of the financial year, it sometimes turns out that a company has paid too little tax in advance and is going to get hit with a hefty tax bill. In principle, there’s no getting out of it, if all possibilities for optimisation have already been exhausted. But you should never think it’s too late to escape that enormous tax bill. The awarding of a bonus can be invoked as a last resort to mitigate the tax burden on your company.

What is a bonus?

A bonus, also known as a tantième, is a share of the profits of a company that is awarded at the annual general meeting to the directors or business manager(s). It doesn’t matter whether or not they are shareholders of the company.

In this respect a bonus is similar to a dividend, since that too is about distributing the profits in a manner decided upon by the annual general meeting. But that’s where the similarity ends.

When a dividend is allocated, all shareholders of the company get an equal piece of the pie in proportion to their shareholdings.

The awarding of a bonus is different. For example, the annual general meeting can award a bonus to one director and not the others. The amounts can also differ if several members of the Board of Directors are separately awarded bonuses.

The basic philosophy of a bonus is that it’s granted as a reward for services performed.

A bonus paid to a business manager or director is considered to be an additional salary, which is a deductible expense for the company. A dividend on the other hand is considered to be a return on capital, so it’s not a deductible expense for the company. For the recipient, a dividend must in principle be reported in the personal income tax return as income from movable property, even after withholding tax has been deducted[1].

The time for deduction as an expense and the taxability for the director or business manager

It’s useful to know that the bonus is regarded as a deductible expense for the paying company in the year to which it relates (and thus not the year in which it is awarded).

A bonus is only taxable for the director or business manager in the year in which it is awarded or made payable.

Example 1

Jane is the business manager of the company HARD@WORK BVBA. On 31 December 2011, the closing date of the financial year, the company made a profit of €50,000 before tax. On 1 May 2012 the annual general meeting was held and it was decided to award Jane a bonus of €15,000.

This means that for the 2011 financial year, the company will only pay tax on a profit of €35,000[2].

Jane will pay personal income tax on the bonus awarded to her in the 2013 assessment year (2012 income year).

Optimisation

If you already draw a salary from your company, the downside of such a bonus is that it will be added to your other remuneration as a director of the company. This often means that the bonus is taxed at the highest personal income tax rate. Three years later, you may also have to pay more social security contributions.

To counteract this, you could consider proportionately reducing your "normal" salary as a company director.

There is another option, whereby the bonus is made payable over several calendar years. A bonus is only taxable for you personally in the year in which it is awarded to you or is made payable[3].

It is very important that you expressly stipulate this in the minutes of the annual general meeting.

Example 2

The same details as in Example 1, but in the minutes of the annual general meeting it is specified that the bonus will be made payable as follows:

  • €5,000 on 1 June 2012
  • €5,000 on 2 January 2013
  • €5,000 on 10 February 2014

Jane will be taxed for the bonus awarded on 1 May 2012, for a total of €15,000, spread over the following years:

  • €5,000 in the 2012 income year
  • €5,000 in the 2013 income year
  • €5,000 in the 2014 income year

Despite the taxability being spread out over time, the full amount of the bonus will be deductible for HARD@WORK BVBA as an expense for the 2011 financial year.

There’s not much point in systematically replacing your salary with a bonus

A feature of the awarding of a bonus is that it allows you to defer the taxability of a portion of the profit of your company. So you could decide to stop paying yourself your "normal" monthly salary and instead award yourself a bonus at every annual general meeting. You’ll gain a year on the payment of taxes on part of your profits. This is perfectly possible in theory, but can sometimes have unexpected consequences.

For example, a monthly salary is still required if your company has taken out the following types of insurance in your favour:

  • Hospital insurance
  • IPC insurance
  • Income protection insurance

The level of your monthly remuneration is critical to the maximum insured amount if your company pays your IPC and/or income protection insurance.

Awarding a bonus can, in certain cases, be particularly useful in reducing the amount of company income tax to be paid. Especially if the results of your company fluctuate sharply from year to year, it can be a useful mechanism for creaming off the profits in the good years and reducing your remuneration in the lean years. But don’t lose sight of the fact that the bonus is considered to be additional remuneration for tax purposes, on which you have to pay personal income tax and social security contributions.

[1] Unless the 4% additional levy is deducted on top of the 21% withholding tax
[2] Disregarding disallowed expenses and certain tax deductions
[3] See Article 204.3 Income Tax Code 1992

A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and
The 'use and enjoyment" rules explained
Freight transport and closely associated services: new rules clarified in a circular
On 31 October 2017, (previous) Royal Decree No 57, which deals with the freight transport services Department and related services, was replaced by a new RD which came into force on 23 November 2017. It clarifies the former RD in part while introducing a new rule. In order to clarify and discuss the (new) rules, the tax authorities published an administrative circular in this regard on 31 May 2018
Guidelines
Substantial changes in the obligations for partnerships
The Company Law Reform, published on 27 April 2018, is making a number of changes in the Companies Code and the Code of Economic Law. These new regulations will enter into force on 1 November 2018. A few rules will also change for partnerships. Although some clarifications will still be published, we would already like to provide the following guidelines. Changes in the Companies Code A first
Quickly detect system risks
Without a Legal Entity Identifier your company will not be trading on the stock market in 2018
  As from 3 January 2018, every legal entity that buys or sells financial instruments must have a Legal Entity Identifier or LEI. Legal Entity Identifier A LEI is a 20-digit alpha-numeric code enabling quick identification of legal entities that are active on the (international or local) financial markets. The LEI enables regulators to quickly detect system risks. Registrati
A summary of the main points
Immovable property leases to include VAT
  Although currently there is just a draft bill on this issue, which obviously can be subject to change in the meantime, we would like to summarize the main points of the upcoming revolution in the VAT landscape: immovable property leases may become subject to VAT. History Until recently, immovable property leases have – in principle – been exempt from VAT (section 44, paragr

Subscribe to our newsletter