The “home services bonus”: let your employer pay for your cleaner or gardener

In recent years, employers and employees alike have been seeking alternative forms of remuneration that are advantageous for both parties; ways to optimise the level of return and benefit for the employee and at the same time minimise the burden of the employer’s social security contributions.

A recently-developed form of extra-legal remuneration, which has been checked with both tax and social security authorities, is the “home services bonus”. 

1. How does it work?

The employer enters into a framework agreement with a facility management company (@Olivier: Please add a link to for a certain budget that makes it possible to deduct a number of working hours for the performance of specific home services. This primarily relates to the following services: Cleaning and housekeeping services, services provided by maids and household staff, drivers, window cleaners, gardeners, and services relating to minor repairs (plumbing, electrical work, painting jobs, etc.).

The employer can offer these working hours to its employees or managers, and the employee or manager is then taxed for a benefit in kind. The benefit in kind is fixed at a flat rate, so it’s not related to the actual cost.

The employee or manager has to go through the employer to book the service with the facility management company, which uses a network of subcontractors to perform the requested services on its behalf. The employer pays the facility management company for the service, which in turn pays the subcontractor.

2. Determining the benefit in kind

As is often the case, the benefit in kind is determined differently for tax and social security purposes. The market leader in this sector has obtained a ruling regarding both the tax and social security aspects, giving certainty to both the employer and the employee with regard to the tax consequences in the event that they use the services provided by the facility management company.

  • Flat-rate tax assessment:

Determination of the benefit in kind for tax purposes is based on the flat-rate benefit in kind that consists of free access to a domestic worker; this benefit is fixed at €5,950 per year for a full-time employee (working 1700 hours per year).

If you convert this into a one-hour benefit in kind, you get a tax benefit of €3.50 per hour (€5,950 / 1700 hrs).

The Advance Ruling Commission (DVB) has accepted this valuation for both employees and managers, and specifically for the following services (NB: This is an exhaustive list):

Cleaning and housekeeping services, services provided by maids and household staff, drivers, window cleaners, gardeners, and services relating to minor repairs.

But be aware that the cost of any products and equipment required to provide the requested services must be paid separately by the employee / manager, who will be invoiced by the subcontractor (e.g. for the purchase of plants in the context of garden maintenance).

  • Flat-rate social security assessment:

The RSZ (National Social Security Office) also accepts a flat-rate assessment of the benefit in kind when calculating the social security contributions to be deducted. Unlike the DVB in the tax assessment opinion, in its own ruling the RSZ did not give an exhaustive list of the services included in this benefit. However, it did refer to services that can be performed using service vouchers or PWA (local employment agency) vouchers (which differ from community to community), namely:

- Service vouchers: Cleaning including windows, washing and ironing, mending of ironed clothes, preparing meals, running errands, help in transporting people of limited mobility;

- PWA vouchers: Help in supervising or looking after sick people or children, help in following administrative procedures, help with light garden maintenance work, minor repairs and maintenance work around the home, looking after and caring for pets while the owners are away (if no pet hotel is available in the area).

But you should note: The RSZ opinion obviously applies only to employees, not to managers.

The informal ruling issued by the RSZ accepts an interim flat-rate assessment of €8.54 per hour, based on the value of a service or PWA voucher.

The RSVZ (National Institute for the Social Security of the Self-Employed) has now also declared its agreement with the flat-rate assessment accepted by the RSZ.

3. So what does this mean in practice for employers and employees?

To explain the benefit to the employee we’ve created an example in diagram form, based on the following parameters, in which the total salary cost for the employer is €1,000:

RSZ – Employer:             34.70%

RSZ – Employee:            13.07%

Payroll tax:                      53.50%

Flat-rate tax valuation of home services performed:             €3.50 / hr

Flat-rate RSZ valuation of home services performed:            €8.54 / hr

Facility management company coordination fee per job:             €22.71

As you will see, the benefit to the employee increases the higher the hourly rate for the service performed, e.g. because of having to use service providers with different hourly rates, meaning fewer hours can be used for the same budget (a comparison is given between €30 and €60 per hour) for specific services: the reason is that for tax and social security purposes the benefits are fixed at a flat rate per hour, regardless of the actual cost of an hour of services.

For a relatively small “salary increase” in the form of a bonus for home services, the employee gets a lot in return, because taxes and social security contributions are calculated on the basis of substantially lower flat-rate amounts.

For an ordinary salary increase with a cost to the employer of €1,000, the net amount left over would be €300. If the employee pays for specific services at a rate of €30/h, he or she will only get 10 hours of services for that salary increase.

But if the increase is turned into a home services bonus at the same cost to the employer, depending on the number of different jobs performed (because of the fixed coordination fee payable for each job), this bonus will almost always allow the employee to obtain at least 20 hours of services at a rate of €30/h or 12 hours of services at a rate of €60/h.

What’s more, the employee can always be sure of dealing with capable, qualified service providers.

The benefit for the employer, of course, lies in the fact that the difference between the actual cost and the pecuniary advantage received is considerably greater for the employee (who can count on receiving €837 or €914 instead of only €300), which means that for a small additional cost the employer can increase the everyday comfort of its employee.

The current market leader offering these “home services” arranges for the subcontractors who perform the requested services to be selected by the bonus recipients themselves. If the recipients choose their own providers, they can agree prices in advance and stipulate the parameters of the job.  Of course, the facility management company has a list of qualified service providers who can be requested by the bonus recipient; the provider is then appointed by the facility management company, taking into account the nature of the job and the satisfaction scores awarded to providers by previous bonus recipients. The facility management company can thus create a “quality label” for the benefit of recipients of the “home services bonus”.

4. Conclusion

This new form of remuneration offers many possibilities for improving the everyday comfort of employees, giving them a financially advantageous way to use qualified service providers without requiring too much effort in terms of accessibility or administration.

In view of the restriction on the number of tax-deductible service vouchers, introduced in various regions in recent years, this plan is certainly a good innovation for employees who already get the maximum amount/number of vouchers from the service vouchers they acquire in the “normal” manner. Because of the government subsidy, service vouchers are slightly more advantageous than the “home services bonus” for one working hour of house cleaning, unless the payment for this service is an extra bonus “over and above” the normal salary. In this case, it results in a saving in the salary net of expenses.

Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and

Subscribe to our newsletter