Online gambling – subject to VAT since 1 July

In previous newsletters we have already discussed two changes that took effect on 1 July: the introduction of the sharing economy and the change in the VAT exemption for cost-sharing associations. A third change slipped in almost under the radar: the abolition of the VAT exemption for online gambling.

1. Limitation of the VAT exemption for gaming and betting from 1 July

Up until 30 June, the VAT exemption for gaming and betting covered all gambling, regardless of whether it took place in physical or online environments. On 1 July the law changed: online forms of gambling, such as sports betting and online bets on horse races, are now subject to VAT at the rate of 21%.  

Physical forms of gambling on the other hand are still exempt from VAT. So when a slot machine is installed in a casino, the operator is still not required to hand over any VAT.  And lotteries, regardless of whether they’re conducted electronically or not, are still not subject to VAT.  

There was some opposition from the sector to the introduction of 21% VAT on online gambling. They were concerned both about unfair competition between the VAT-exempt National Lottery and the private sector, and that the move could stimulate growth of the black market, leading to the proliferation of illegal sites.

2. Definitions of “forms of gambling” and “lotteries”

On 1 July, the definition of what exactly is meant by “forms of gambling” was moved from Royal Decree No. 45 to Clause 1 of the VAT Code. For VAT purposes, “forms of gambling” means:

  • Games which provide an opportunity to compete for prizes or premiums in cash or in kind, in which participants cannot intervene, either at the start, during the game or at the end, and where winners are determined exclusively through the drawing of lots or some other form of chance determination;
  • Games which provide an opportunity to compete for prizes or premiums in cash or in kind, offered to participants in a contest of any nature, unless the contest has the result of creating a contract between the winners and the contest organiser.

“Lottery” has now also been defined for VAT purposes as “any opportunity to compete for prizes or premiums in cash or in kind by means of the purchase of shares of participation, in which the winners are determined through the drawing of lots or another form of chance determination over which they cannot exercise any influence.”

3. For what things must VAT be included?

Just as for other services, VAT must be included in everything the online gambling provider receives as consideration from participants for being allowed to take part in the gambling.  

It is inherent in some forms of gambling that participants can win back some or all of their stake. If this is the case, the organiser does not have to charge VAT on the portion of a stake that is distributed as winnings.
If the winner of the online form of gambling receives a prize in kind, the taxable amount is reduced by the normal value of this prize. Since taxes, duties and charges are part of the taxable amount, VAT is calculated on the wagered amounts – including the gambling tax, because online forms of gambling are of course still subject to this separate tax on gaming and betting.
So VAT is only calculated on the actual gross margin achieved.

4. Online forms of gambling offered by foreign organisers

When a Belgian resident makes a wager on an online gambling website, Belgian VAT is payable. Foreign organisers therefore run the risk of having to pay Belgian VAT if they take bets from people living in Belgium. In theory, they should apply for Belgian VAT numbers and comply with all associated VAT obligations (e.g. periodically submitting VAT returns).  

But if all the foreign organiser does is offer these electronic services, and if it is already identified for VAT purposes in another EU member state, then it can choose to declare its turnover in that other EU member state using a MOSS return.

What if it subsequently transpires that the foreign organiser of the online gambling has not paid Belgian VAT in relation to the Belgian bets because it had not applied for a VAT number in Belgium or any other EU member state? In that case, the VAT authorities can recover this Belgian VAT from the individual gamer him or herself. To this end, a specific reference to joint and several liability was introduced into the VAT legislation. Gamblers have been warned ...

5. Entry into force delayed

In theory, the VAT exemption for online forms of gambling was abolished on 1 July 2016. However, on that same day the Minister stated that the application of VAT would only come into force on 1 August 2016, allowing the affected sector to prepare for the new arrangements.

In the same message, the Minister confirmed that a circular would be published in the near future to explain the practical aspects and consequences of the new rules.

 

The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg
More specific: matrimonial property law
A new compensation obligation in the legal system
What if a spouse practices his profession in a company whose shares all form part of his separate property? The Act of 22 July 2018 has introduced considerable changes to matrimonial property law. This article addresses a specific addition to that law, namely the possible disadvantage incurred by the matrimonial property when a spouse practices their profession through their own company1. 
Changes in the cary proxy and usufruct
Estate planning: recent developments
Over the last few months, we have regularly reported on the important changes in estate planning and inheritance planning. Below is an update of some of those changes.   The care proxy: secure your estate for later The classic example is a person who, due to a physical or mental limitation (e.g. coma, dementia), is – temporarily or permanently – unable to manage their assets properly.
Happy Brexmas?
How to prepare your company for Brexit?
On 10 December 2018, the British Prime Minister decided to postpone the vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons. The risk of a ‘no deal’ disaster scenario is increasing. What are the important dates? On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom formally informed the European Council of its intention to leave the EU (according to the procedure provided in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty). C
A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if
Right to deduct VAT possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares
The Ryanair ruling
Right to deduct VAT also possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares, if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead The European Court of Justice recently confirmed that VAT on costs incurred during the purchase of shares may be deductible even if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead. As such, the Court of Justice has upheld the principle that the preparatory t
What are the options?
The deduction for investment: an illustration of the options
The deduction for investment allows companies and natural persons who earn profits or benefits to reduce their taxable profits by placing part of the acquisition or investment value of investments in new tangible and intangible fixed assets. Depending on the size of your business and the nature of your activities, you can generally apply the regular, one-off deduction for investment of 20% (tem
Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f

Subscribe to our newsletter