New aspects and points for attention in respect of the social insurance regulations for self-employed persons

A number of interesting amendments have been introduced in respect of the social insurance regulations for self-employed persons which we would like to inform you of.

1. Deadline for joining

To date, new self-employed persons were required to join a social insurance fund no later than on the date upon which the independent activities commenced.

Since 01 July 2016, they have been required to join prior to the activities commencing.

Anyone caught practicing an independent activity without having joined a social insurance fund can expect to pay a penalty of €500 to €2,000.

2. Joint and several liability for administrative monetary penalties

Henceforth a self-employed person is not only jointly and severally liable for the payment of the social security contributions of his or her self-employed assistant, but also for administrative monetary penalties payable by the self-employed assistant. This pertains to monetary penalties from €500 to €2,000 payable for each established infringement: for example, if the starting self-employed person has not immediately joined a social insurance fund while being obliged to do so, or where it emerges that a person is practicing a different profession to the one that he or she registered for with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises.

Legal entities have already been jointly and severally liable for some time for both the social security contributions as well as the administrative monetary penalties payable by their ‘members or mandatories’.

3. Applications to have social security contribution payments reduced streamlined

Since 2015 the social security contributions have been provisionally calculated using the professional income for three years beforehand. After that an adjustment is performed using the professional income for the current year.

If those provisional sums are too high, then one can apply for a reduction on the basis of the presumed income for the current year, subject to presenting objective elements that justify such a reduction.

Until recently it was the rule that a separate application had to be submitted for each calendar year.

In the meantime the FPS Social Security has streamlined this rule, which means that henceforth an application can be submitted for one, two or three calendar years using the same application form. Objective elements that concern the reduced income for those years for which a reduction is requested must of course be presented.

A self-employed person must however still submit an application each year, as he or she will generally not be able to present objective elements concerning a reduced income over multiple years.

On the other hand, an unremunerated mandatory can present a report from the general meeting or a copy of the articles of association in order to request a reduction in the provisional contributions for three successive years.

4. No post-retirement adjustment

If you are set to retire or completely cease operating as a self-employed person, then you can apply to stop paying the adjustments after retiring.

Until 2014 you paid social security contributions on your professional income earned three years before the date of payment. That was a final sum that was not adjustable.

As of 2015 you first pay a provisional sum on your income earned three years ago. Two years later an adjustment is performed for this contribution based on the professional income for the contribution year itself.

When you retire you can apply to stop paying these adjustment sums. These adjustment contributions can only be waived under specific conditions:

- You cease your independent activities no later than on the date of your retirement;
- You apply for the adjustments to be waived prior to your retirement commencing;
- The application pertains to the adjustment contributions for the year you retire and for the three preceding contribution years, insofar as these contributions have not yet been adjusted on the date that retirement commenced;
- You did not receive a contribution reduction for any of these years. If this was the case you are still able to waive this reduction, but in that case you will pay increased sums. You will thus have to check whether these expenses outweigh the gains.

For example

You are to retire on 1 January 2017. You can apply to not pay the adjustment contributions for 2015, 2016 and 2017. You must submit the application before 1 January 2017 and you must cease your self-employed activities no later than on that date. In that event, the Social Security Fund will not send you adjustment statements.

Please note:

The application pertains to both the adjustment contributions you must pay as well as to any funds you will receive back. You must thus estimate whether the balance for the entire period is positive or negative.

For example

You are to retire on 1 September 2017. Let’s say that you have to pay an adjustment of €2,000 for 2015, but for the years 2016 and 2017 you will get back €2,500 in total. On balance that means you gain €500, and in this case it is best to not apply for the adjustments to be waived.

The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg
More specific: matrimonial property law
A new compensation obligation in the legal system
What if a spouse practices his profession in a company whose shares all form part of his separate property? The Act of 22 July 2018 has introduced considerable changes to matrimonial property law. This article addresses a specific addition to that law, namely the possible disadvantage incurred by the matrimonial property when a spouse practices their profession through their own company1. 
Changes in the cary proxy and usufruct
Estate planning: recent developments
Over the last few months, we have regularly reported on the important changes in estate planning and inheritance planning. Below is an update of some of those changes.   The care proxy: secure your estate for later The classic example is a person who, due to a physical or mental limitation (e.g. coma, dementia), is – temporarily or permanently – unable to manage their assets properly.
Happy Brexmas?
How to prepare your company for Brexit?
On 10 December 2018, the British Prime Minister decided to postpone the vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons. The risk of a ‘no deal’ disaster scenario is increasing. What are the important dates? On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom formally informed the European Council of its intention to leave the EU (according to the procedure provided in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty). C
A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if
Right to deduct VAT possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares
The Ryanair ruling
Right to deduct VAT also possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares, if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead The European Court of Justice recently confirmed that VAT on costs incurred during the purchase of shares may be deductible even if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead. As such, the Court of Justice has upheld the principle that the preparatory t
What are the options?
The deduction for investment: an illustration of the options
The deduction for investment allows companies and natural persons who earn profits or benefits to reduce their taxable profits by placing part of the acquisition or investment value of investments in new tangible and intangible fixed assets. Depending on the size of your business and the nature of your activities, you can generally apply the regular, one-off deduction for investment of 20% (tem
Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f

Subscribe to our newsletter