Will the EU now permit VAT deductions on the basis of non-compliant purchase invoices?

In a recent ruling the Court of Justice adopted the viewpoint that the tax authorities cannot refuse the right to deduct VAT just because certain required information was not stated on an invoice. In this particular case the authorities had all the information required to check whether all material conditions for exercising this right of deduction were met.

1. Principle: no compliant invoice - no deduction

Both EU law (the VAT Directive) and Belgian legislation assume that the VAT-payer must have a compliant purchase invoice in order to have the right to deduct VAT (and, of course, the VAT must also be related to an activity or transaction that entitles a deduction – we will not be further examining this point within the scope of this article). The notion of a ‘compliant purchase invoice’ must here be understood to be an invoice that contains all the required information as listed in the list of information that must appear on an invoice.

By virtue of this list it is required that, among other things, the invoice must state the scope and nature of the services provided, but with it not being specifically prescribed that the said services must be exhaustively detailed. It was exactly this sore point in the case that the European Court of Justice was presented with.

2. A vague description without a definite period stated on the invoice

A Portuguese VAT-payer acquired legal services from a legal firm. The legal firm had dispatched invoices with VAT for these services upon which was stated: ‘legal services in the period from … to the present’.

In her VAT return the VAT-payer had deducted the VAT charged in these invoices. But the Portuguese VAT authorities believed that this deduction was unjustified, as the invoices did not comply with the statutory requirements because the services performed were insufficiently detailed.

3. ....does still not suffice as invoice information!

The Court of Justice adhered to the reasoning of the Portuguese VAT authorities in the sense that the description on the invoices issued by the legal firm was inadequate because, on the basis of the description, the services provided cannot be determined to a sufficient extent. If ongoing services are involved, the invoice must clearly state the period to which the invoice pertains. Consequently, the invoice must contain both the start date and the end date of the period in which the services concerned were performed.

4. But this does not hinder the right to deduction!

After ruling that the invoices did not comply with the statutory requirements, the Court of Justice had an important addendum. If, notwithstanding a ‘formal defect’ on the invoice, it can be determined that the VAT is justifiably deducted, the VAT authorities may not refuse it. After all, the VAT authorities must take into account all the information on the invoices concerned as well as the supplementary documents and/or additional information submitted by the VAT-payer. The Court thus explicitly adopted the assertion that the right to deduction cannot be declined just because the invoice does not comply with all the formal requirements of information on an invoice.

The Court moreover found that the above reasoning did not prevent the imposition of a monetary fine or sanction, in the event of such formal breaches, proportionate to the gravity of the defect, for the purposes of penalising that non-compliance with the formal conditions.

5. What does this mean in concrete terms for Belgian invoices?

The fact that the Court of Justice ruled as it did is very good news for VAT-payers, certainly in a strictly formalised context in Belgium, but one must still treat the standpoint with care.

The ruling is not a free pass to stop checking whether received purchase invoices are complete and correct. On the one hand the Court of Justice sees no problem with (proportionally) penalising non-compliance with the formality requirements, which means that the Belgian VAT authorities can feel as if that point has been corroborated. On the other hand, in certain cases this standpoint can help us to temper the often stringent approach of the VAT authorities and to safely assert the right to deduction in situations where the invoice is not wholly compliant but where the actual circumstances or other documents completely substantiate that right to deduction.

Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and

Subscribe to our newsletter