VAT grouping: is it forever and ever?

In 2017 the concept of the VAT group will have existed for a decade in Belgium. This article is not being written in celebration thereof, but we wish to use the anniversary to recall a number of important issues concerning the VAT groups of today.

1. Creation of a VAT group

Since 1 April 2007 Belgian law has allowed for taxable parties based in Belgium that are legally independent but financially, organisationally and economically closely tied to each other to be considered as a single taxable party – a VAT group. The most striking characteristics of such a unification are that the activities between the members (of the VAT group) fall outside of the scope of VAT and that the right to deduction is no longer determined at member level but at group level on the basis of the activities that the VAT group provides for the outside world (the non-members). 

A number of opportunities for optimisation can be found in those characteristics that, since 2007, enticed and still entices numerous groups of affiliated taxable parties to create a VAT group. In order to create a VAT group the affiliated members must convince the tax authorities that they are associated on a financial, organisational and economic level.

The financial affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the shareholdership, supervisory relationships and the voting rights of the members in regard to each other.

The organisational affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the joint management of the members.

The economic affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the activities of those members. They could be of the same nature, they could support each other or they could even be performed on behalf of another member.

2. After formation – is it forever?

Once such affiliations are accepted by the authorities, then a VAT group is recognised. But these affiliations cannot only exist at the time of the formation – they must continue to exist for the time that the VAT group exists. It is however in this requirement of durability that there lies a hidden risk.

Over the years the financial, economic and organisational characteristics of one or more taxable parties and the associated affiliations can change. A new generation acquires the shares, mandates of directors are not extended, agreements are terminated, and so on, without the taxable parties being aware that as a result the VAT group is no longer permitted to exist or can no longer exist in its present form.

This unconscious cessation of or change to the VAT group entails a number of significant risks. Firstly, the intended optimisation may no longer be maintainable and it continues unjustly after the unconscious cessation.

Further, specific VAT obligations are not fulfilled or not properly fulfilled. For example, the authorities are not informed of the amended VAT situation and the periodic VAT obligations continue to be unjustly performed by the group instead of by the members after the unconscious cessation.

But the biggest risk is that one could not perform VAT revisions with respect to the capital resources. In the event of a cessation or departure from a VAT group, and if the revision period has not yet expired, a revision must be conducted of the VAT originally deducted that was levied on the capital resources. This revision is conducted for both the departing member/members as well as the VAT group. Specifically, it is the VAT group that shall be subjected to a downwards revision. If the downwards revision is not conducted, there is a risk that there will be an additional tax assessment imposed by the authorities in the event of an audit.

The above risks and their consequences can be checked and limited, even if the unconscious cessation on the part of the taxable party is only discovered later. This is why it is important to – especially during times of structural changes within a company, but also at any other given time – ask the question on occasion of the VAT group’s tenth anniversary: is our VAT group still a VAT group? 

Legally most correct solution
Successive usufruct: The Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel) confirms the method of levying the registration duties
On 10 December 2018, a remarkable position was published on the Vlabel website (Position no 18083 of 26 November 2018). The real estate tax system is becoming more and more sophisticated with more (tax) advantages. The question must therefore be asked whether the well-known "simple" usufruct will not be partially replaced by transactions with a double or successive usufruct. In the area of registr
From 1 January 2019
New Flemish Lease Decree
On 24 October 2018, the Flemish Parliament approved the new Flemish Lease Decree. In our newsletter of 26 October 2017, we already hinted at the changes that this new decree will bring about. One of the most important changes remains the decree's broad scope. On the one hand, extensive regulations are provided for the rental of a house intended as a main residence. What is new here is that the ter
Confirmed in writing to our office
Confirmed: both usufructuary and bare owner are to be included in the UBO register
The Belgian Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) register went live on 31 October 2018. On the basis of the legal texts and the explanatory notes, as ultimate beneficiary/ies of companies, the natural person(s) who directly or indirectly hold(s) a sufficient percentage of the voting rights or of the ownership interest in this company must first be notified. A holding of at least 25% is an indication of
The advantage is a taxable benefit
Fiches and withholding tax on benefits granted by foreign companies
Should payments received from a foreign company be subject to withholding tax and should this be declared on a fiche? At the moment, the answer to this question is negative in most situations, but this is set to change. A new draft law dated 18 December 2018 provides for the introduction of a tax fiction that requires the (Belgian) employer of the beneficiary employee not only to withhold withh
The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg
More specific: matrimonial property law
A new compensation obligation in the legal system
What if a spouse practices his profession in a company whose shares all form part of his separate property? The Act of 22 July 2018 has introduced considerable changes to matrimonial property law. This article addresses a specific addition to that law, namely the possible disadvantage incurred by the matrimonial property when a spouse practices their profession through their own company1. 
Changes in the cary proxy and usufruct
Estate planning: recent developments
Over the last few months, we have regularly reported on the important changes in estate planning and inheritance planning. Below is an update of some of those changes.   The care proxy: secure your estate for later The classic example is a person who, due to a physical or mental limitation (e.g. coma, dementia), is – temporarily or permanently – unable to manage their assets properly.
Happy Brexmas?
How to prepare your company for Brexit?
On 10 December 2018, the British Prime Minister decided to postpone the vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons. The risk of a ‘no deal’ disaster scenario is increasing. What are the important dates? On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom formally informed the European Council of its intention to leave the EU (according to the procedure provided in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty). C
A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if

Subscribe to our newsletter