VAT grouping: is it forever and ever?

In 2017 the concept of the VAT group will have existed for a decade in Belgium. This article is not being written in celebration thereof, but we wish to use the anniversary to recall a number of important issues concerning the VAT groups of today.

1. Creation of a VAT group

Since 1 April 2007 Belgian law has allowed for taxable parties based in Belgium that are legally independent but financially, organisationally and economically closely tied to each other to be considered as a single taxable party – a VAT group. The most striking characteristics of such a unification are that the activities between the members (of the VAT group) fall outside of the scope of VAT and that the right to deduction is no longer determined at member level but at group level on the basis of the activities that the VAT group provides for the outside world (the non-members). 

A number of opportunities for optimisation can be found in those characteristics that, since 2007, enticed and still entices numerous groups of affiliated taxable parties to create a VAT group. In order to create a VAT group the affiliated members must convince the tax authorities that they are associated on a financial, organisational and economic level.

The financial affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the shareholdership, supervisory relationships and the voting rights of the members in regard to each other.

The organisational affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the joint management of the members.

The economic affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the activities of those members. They could be of the same nature, they could support each other or they could even be performed on behalf of another member.

2. After formation – is it forever?

Once such affiliations are accepted by the authorities, then a VAT group is recognised. But these affiliations cannot only exist at the time of the formation – they must continue to exist for the time that the VAT group exists. It is however in this requirement of durability that there lies a hidden risk.

Over the years the financial, economic and organisational characteristics of one or more taxable parties and the associated affiliations can change. A new generation acquires the shares, mandates of directors are not extended, agreements are terminated, and so on, without the taxable parties being aware that as a result the VAT group is no longer permitted to exist or can no longer exist in its present form.

This unconscious cessation of or change to the VAT group entails a number of significant risks. Firstly, the intended optimisation may no longer be maintainable and it continues unjustly after the unconscious cessation.

Further, specific VAT obligations are not fulfilled or not properly fulfilled. For example, the authorities are not informed of the amended VAT situation and the periodic VAT obligations continue to be unjustly performed by the group instead of by the members after the unconscious cessation.

But the biggest risk is that one could not perform VAT revisions with respect to the capital resources. In the event of a cessation or departure from a VAT group, and if the revision period has not yet expired, a revision must be conducted of the VAT originally deducted that was levied on the capital resources. This revision is conducted for both the departing member/members as well as the VAT group. Specifically, it is the VAT group that shall be subjected to a downwards revision. If the downwards revision is not conducted, there is a risk that there will be an additional tax assessment imposed by the authorities in the event of an audit.

The above risks and their consequences can be checked and limited, even if the unconscious cessation on the part of the taxable party is only discovered later. This is why it is important to – especially during times of structural changes within a company, but also at any other given time – ask the question on occasion of the VAT group’s tenth anniversary: is our VAT group still a VAT group? 

A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if
Right to deduct VAT possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares
The Ryanair ruling
Right to deduct VAT also possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares, if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead The European Court of Justice recently confirmed that VAT on costs incurred during the purchase of shares may be deductible even if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead. As such, the Court of Justice has upheld the principle that the preparatory t
What are the options?
The deduction for investment: an illustration of the options
The deduction for investment allows companies and natural persons who earn profits or benefits to reduce their taxable profits by placing part of the acquisition or investment value of investments in new tangible and intangible fixed assets. Depending on the size of your business and the nature of your activities, you can generally apply the regular, one-off deduction for investment of 20% (tem
Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f
The labour market of the future
Earn (on the side) flexibly and untaxed
There are three legal social statuses in Belgium, (i) employee, (ii) self-employed and (iii) civil servant. However, the question is often asked whether these classifications are still relevant to the rapidly evolving labour market in which flexibility is key and many people opt for a 'freelance status' or wish to combine several statuses. Voka has already called for a debate on the labour mark
Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon

Subscribe to our newsletter