VAT grouping: is it forever and ever?

In 2017 the concept of the VAT group will have existed for a decade in Belgium. This article is not being written in celebration thereof, but we wish to use the anniversary to recall a number of important issues concerning the VAT groups of today.

1. Creation of a VAT group

Since 1 April 2007 Belgian law has allowed for taxable parties based in Belgium that are legally independent but financially, organisationally and economically closely tied to each other to be considered as a single taxable party – a VAT group. The most striking characteristics of such a unification are that the activities between the members (of the VAT group) fall outside of the scope of VAT and that the right to deduction is no longer determined at member level but at group level on the basis of the activities that the VAT group provides for the outside world (the non-members). 

A number of opportunities for optimisation can be found in those characteristics that, since 2007, enticed and still entices numerous groups of affiliated taxable parties to create a VAT group. In order to create a VAT group the affiliated members must convince the tax authorities that they are associated on a financial, organisational and economic level.

The financial affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the shareholdership, supervisory relationships and the voting rights of the members in regard to each other.

The organisational affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the joint management of the members.

The economic affiliation is in principle demonstrated by means of the activities of those members. They could be of the same nature, they could support each other or they could even be performed on behalf of another member.

2. After formation – is it forever?

Once such affiliations are accepted by the authorities, then a VAT group is recognised. But these affiliations cannot only exist at the time of the formation – they must continue to exist for the time that the VAT group exists. It is however in this requirement of durability that there lies a hidden risk.

Over the years the financial, economic and organisational characteristics of one or more taxable parties and the associated affiliations can change. A new generation acquires the shares, mandates of directors are not extended, agreements are terminated, and so on, without the taxable parties being aware that as a result the VAT group is no longer permitted to exist or can no longer exist in its present form.

This unconscious cessation of or change to the VAT group entails a number of significant risks. Firstly, the intended optimisation may no longer be maintainable and it continues unjustly after the unconscious cessation.

Further, specific VAT obligations are not fulfilled or not properly fulfilled. For example, the authorities are not informed of the amended VAT situation and the periodic VAT obligations continue to be unjustly performed by the group instead of by the members after the unconscious cessation.

But the biggest risk is that one could not perform VAT revisions with respect to the capital resources. In the event of a cessation or departure from a VAT group, and if the revision period has not yet expired, a revision must be conducted of the VAT originally deducted that was levied on the capital resources. This revision is conducted for both the departing member/members as well as the VAT group. Specifically, it is the VAT group that shall be subjected to a downwards revision. If the downwards revision is not conducted, there is a risk that there will be an additional tax assessment imposed by the authorities in the event of an audit.

The above risks and their consequences can be checked and limited, even if the unconscious cessation on the part of the taxable party is only discovered later. This is why it is important to – especially during times of structural changes within a company, but also at any other given time – ask the question on occasion of the VAT group’s tenth anniversary: is our VAT group still a VAT group? 

Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and

Subscribe to our newsletter