Year-end tax optimisations series – advance payments

We are once again entering the final month of the year, and for most companies that also means the last month of the financial year. This is when there is still enough time to optimise numerous issues before the financial year effectively concludes. In this series we will shed light on a number of potential techniques for tax optimisation.

1. Introduction – ratio legis of advance payments

In order to calculate a company’s corporation tax, a corporation must submit a corporation tax return. Companies that keep their books per calendar year generally submit their corporation tax returns in September of the following year. Companies who do not work according to the calendar year must submit their corporation tax returns at the end of the month following the month in which the general meeting is held, with such no later than six months after the end of the financial year.

The tax authorities then calculate the taxes after receiving these returns, and send out an assessment notice based on these. The tax only has to be effectively paid at the end of the second month after the assessment notice was sent, which in many cases is over a year after the conclusion of the relevant financial year. In order to eliminate this ‘cash flow problem’ on the part of the government, the authorities have introduced a system of advance payments that is designed to encourage companies (and other taxpayers) to already pay their taxes during the course of the financial year. 

2. Advance payments

They encourage the taxpayers to do this by raising the calculated taxes by a given percentage. In the 2017 assessment year (2016 financial year) the amount is 1.125 percent. This means that if you do not make advance payments you will have to pay 1.125 percent more in taxes than has been calculated.

But this increase can be avoided by making sufficient advance payments. These advance payments occur in four quarters, with each quarter having its own benefits. For financial years that are not longer or shorter than one year, the first quarter applies to all advance payments made up until the 10th day of the 4th month of the financial year, while quarter two holds for all payments made until the 10th day of the 7th month, quarter three applies until the 10th day of the 10th month and advance payments for the fourth quarter must be received no later than on the 20th day of the final month. If the aforementioned days are during the weekend or on a public holiday, then the final date is the following workday.

There are different benefits for each quarter. For the 2017 assessment year, a benefit of 1.5 percent applies to quarter one, 1.25 percent for quarter two, one percent for quarter 3 and just 0.75 percent for quarter four. These benefits can neutralise the charged increase.

It is however important to remember that at present there will be no increase from a legal perspective if the total increase is less than €40 or less than one percent of the tax to be paid. It is the latter restriction that is troubling the authorities this year. 

3. Limited impact for the current year

Imagine that your company has been paying in the region of €100,000 in taxes for years. The increase due to insufficient advance payments will then be €1,125. You can easily setoff this increase by paying €25,000 in advance every quarter. When taken together with the abovementioned benefits, this will result in a net increase of €0.

But… imagine you only made an advance payment of €10,000 in quarter one, which gives us a benefit of €10,000 x 1.5% = €150. Our net increase is then €1,125 - €150 = €975 or less than one percent of the tax to be paid (100,000 x 1% = 1,000), which means you do not have to pay the increase. That means you can hang on to your hard-earned cash for a bit and just pay the taxman the following year when you receive your assessment notice.

4. Forgot to make the advance payments?

If you’ve forgotten to make your advance payments, then you must work out how much you should pay in advance in quarter four (before 20 December 2016) in order to avoid that increase due to insufficient advance payments. 

Using the same example as above, with €100,000 in expected corporation tax, the increase will be €1,125. As soon as we get the net increase, after being offset with the benefits resulting from the advance payments, to below €1,000 (being one percent of the tax to be paid), the entire increase lapses. So at the very least a benefit of €126 must be obtained at a percentage of 0.75%, which in this example means a minimum advance payment of €16,800 or 16.8 percent.

So if you have forgotten to make advance payments, you can still pay 16.8 percent of your expected corporation tax before 20 December 2016 and you will avoid the increase implemented for insufficient advance payments. Given that the corporation tax ultimately payable cannot of course be accurately estimated before the end of the financial year, it is best to add a safety margin and pay around 20 percent in advance.

5. Legislative amendment

Naturally, the authorities also quickly spotted this benefit, and have already amended the law, which means that the increase on the grounds of insufficient advance payments will always amount to at least 2.25 percent as of the 2018 assessment year. That means it will become a lot more appealing to pay in advance.

Another important aspect in this respect is that the one percent threshold will no longer apply, which means you will always have to pay an increase on the grounds of insufficient advance payments, even if the net increase is less than one percent of the tax to be paid. The €40 threshold will however remain in place. 

6. Conclusion

Even though it does not provide real advantages to make advance payments this year, it is still wise to pay a small portion of your taxes in advance so as to avoid the increase due to insufficient advance payments. As of next year it will once again be an appealing option to make advance payments, thanks to the combination of the percentage being doubled and the fact that the one percent threshold will lapse.

 

The new rules for VAT processing of vouchers
The wonderful world of VAT and vouchers
Vouchers are a very popular marketing tool. There are various types of vouchers: discount vouchers issued by a manufacturer, redeemable at any sales outlet in Belgium, discount coupons issued free of charge by retailers, vouchers where you can get a newly launched article free of charge, gift vouchers that can be redeemed for a whole range of products or services, electronic vouchers, etc. Are yo
A showpiece, or rather a sticking plaster for a broken arm?
The Belgian fiscal consolidation regime
The general intention with the introduction of a fiscal consolidation regime was clear, namely to put the Belgian tax system back in a positive light. After all, many of our neighbouring countries have had a system of fiscal consolidation in place for many years, and Belgium consequently scored badly on this point when international groups were looking to choose an investment location. The ques
The long-term lease revival
Superficies as stealth usufruct?
A noteworthy judgement was recently handed down by the Court of Appeal of Brussels regarding the taxation of overly cheap accession in the case of superficies (23 January 2019). In the past, a number of rulings had already been made on this subject (see, inter alia, Court in Ghent of 31 October 2017). The tax authorities are clearly keen to see the end of the right of superficies, and the two judg
'Paulian claim' to the rescue
Thwarting the taxman by rejecting an inheritance: is it possible?
In inheritance law, multiple heirs can have a statutory inheritance claim. As such, they are entitled to a minimum share of the inheritance. Since the new inheritance law, it is possible to freely dispose of half of one's assets. This is called the available part. If the available part is exceeded by donations, the statutory heirs may request the reduction. Through the reduction, the statutory hei
Appointing a Belgian fiscal representative is necessary
BREXIT: Important VAT news for UK companies with a Belgian VAT number
The Belgian VAT authorities confirmed that UK companies with a direct Belgian VAT registration need to appoint a Belgian fiscal representative for VAT purposes before 30/03/2019. This is in case of a no-deal Brexit on that date. The VAT administration will allow these UK companies to maintain their current Belgian VAT number, also after appointing a fiscal representative for VAT purposes. 
Legally most correct solution
Successive usufruct: The Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel) confirms the method of levying the registration duties
On 10 December 2018, a remarkable position was published on the Vlabel website (Position no 18083 of 26 November 2018). The real estate tax system is becoming more and more sophisticated with more (tax) advantages. The question must therefore be asked whether the well-known "simple" usufruct will not be partially replaced by transactions with a double or successive usufruct. In the area of registr
From 1 January 2019
New Flemish Lease Decree
On 24 October 2018, the Flemish Parliament approved the new Flemish Lease Decree. In our newsletter of 26 October 2017, we already hinted at the changes that this new decree will bring about. One of the most important changes remains the decree's broad scope. On the one hand, extensive regulations are provided for the rental of a house intended as a main residence. What is new here is that the ter
Confirmed in writing to our office
Confirmed: both usufructuary and bare owner are to be included in the UBO register
The Belgian Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) register went live on 31 October 2018. On the basis of the legal texts and the explanatory notes, as ultimate beneficiary/ies of companies, the natural person(s) who directly or indirectly hold(s) a sufficient percentage of the voting rights or of the ownership interest in this company must first be notified. A holding of at least 25% is an indication of
The advantage is a taxable benefit
Fiches and withholding tax on benefits granted by foreign companies
Should payments received from a foreign company be subject to withholding tax and should this be declared on a fiche? At the moment, the answer to this question is negative in most situations, but this is set to change. A new draft law dated 18 December 2018 provides for the introduction of a tax fiction that requires the (Belgian) employer of the beneficiary employee not only to withhold withh
The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg

Subscribe to our newsletter