Year-end tax optimisations series – advance payments

We are once again entering the final month of the year, and for most companies that also means the last month of the financial year. This is when there is still enough time to optimise numerous issues before the financial year effectively concludes. In this series we will shed light on a number of potential techniques for tax optimisation.

1. Introduction – ratio legis of advance payments

In order to calculate a company’s corporation tax, a corporation must submit a corporation tax return. Companies that keep their books per calendar year generally submit their corporation tax returns in September of the following year. Companies who do not work according to the calendar year must submit their corporation tax returns at the end of the month following the month in which the general meeting is held, with such no later than six months after the end of the financial year.

The tax authorities then calculate the taxes after receiving these returns, and send out an assessment notice based on these. The tax only has to be effectively paid at the end of the second month after the assessment notice was sent, which in many cases is over a year after the conclusion of the relevant financial year. In order to eliminate this ‘cash flow problem’ on the part of the government, the authorities have introduced a system of advance payments that is designed to encourage companies (and other taxpayers) to already pay their taxes during the course of the financial year. 

2. Advance payments

They encourage the taxpayers to do this by raising the calculated taxes by a given percentage. In the 2017 assessment year (2016 financial year) the amount is 1.125 percent. This means that if you do not make advance payments you will have to pay 1.125 percent more in taxes than has been calculated.

But this increase can be avoided by making sufficient advance payments. These advance payments occur in four quarters, with each quarter having its own benefits. For financial years that are not longer or shorter than one year, the first quarter applies to all advance payments made up until the 10th day of the 4th month of the financial year, while quarter two holds for all payments made until the 10th day of the 7th month, quarter three applies until the 10th day of the 10th month and advance payments for the fourth quarter must be received no later than on the 20th day of the final month. If the aforementioned days are during the weekend or on a public holiday, then the final date is the following workday.

There are different benefits for each quarter. For the 2017 assessment year, a benefit of 1.5 percent applies to quarter one, 1.25 percent for quarter two, one percent for quarter 3 and just 0.75 percent for quarter four. These benefits can neutralise the charged increase.

It is however important to remember that at present there will be no increase from a legal perspective if the total increase is less than €40 or less than one percent of the tax to be paid. It is the latter restriction that is troubling the authorities this year. 

3. Limited impact for the current year

Imagine that your company has been paying in the region of €100,000 in taxes for years. The increase due to insufficient advance payments will then be €1,125. You can easily setoff this increase by paying €25,000 in advance every quarter. When taken together with the abovementioned benefits, this will result in a net increase of €0.

But… imagine you only made an advance payment of €10,000 in quarter one, which gives us a benefit of €10,000 x 1.5% = €150. Our net increase is then €1,125 - €150 = €975 or less than one percent of the tax to be paid (100,000 x 1% = 1,000), which means you do not have to pay the increase. That means you can hang on to your hard-earned cash for a bit and just pay the taxman the following year when you receive your assessment notice.

4. Forgot to make the advance payments?

If you’ve forgotten to make your advance payments, then you must work out how much you should pay in advance in quarter four (before 20 December 2016) in order to avoid that increase due to insufficient advance payments. 

Using the same example as above, with €100,000 in expected corporation tax, the increase will be €1,125. As soon as we get the net increase, after being offset with the benefits resulting from the advance payments, to below €1,000 (being one percent of the tax to be paid), the entire increase lapses. So at the very least a benefit of €126 must be obtained at a percentage of 0.75%, which in this example means a minimum advance payment of €16,800 or 16.8 percent.

So if you have forgotten to make advance payments, you can still pay 16.8 percent of your expected corporation tax before 20 December 2016 and you will avoid the increase implemented for insufficient advance payments. Given that the corporation tax ultimately payable cannot of course be accurately estimated before the end of the financial year, it is best to add a safety margin and pay around 20 percent in advance.

5. Legislative amendment

Naturally, the authorities also quickly spotted this benefit, and have already amended the law, which means that the increase on the grounds of insufficient advance payments will always amount to at least 2.25 percent as of the 2018 assessment year. That means it will become a lot more appealing to pay in advance.

Another important aspect in this respect is that the one percent threshold will no longer apply, which means you will always have to pay an increase on the grounds of insufficient advance payments, even if the net increase is less than one percent of the tax to be paid. The €40 threshold will however remain in place. 

6. Conclusion

Even though it does not provide real advantages to make advance payments this year, it is still wise to pay a small portion of your taxes in advance so as to avoid the increase due to insufficient advance payments. As of next year it will once again be an appealing option to make advance payments, thanks to the combination of the percentage being doubled and the fact that the one percent threshold will lapse.

 

The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg
More specific: matrimonial property law
A new compensation obligation in the legal system
What if a spouse practices his profession in a company whose shares all form part of his separate property? The Act of 22 July 2018 has introduced considerable changes to matrimonial property law. This article addresses a specific addition to that law, namely the possible disadvantage incurred by the matrimonial property when a spouse practices their profession through their own company1. 
Changes in the cary proxy and usufruct
Estate planning: recent developments
Over the last few months, we have regularly reported on the important changes in estate planning and inheritance planning. Below is an update of some of those changes.   The care proxy: secure your estate for later The classic example is a person who, due to a physical or mental limitation (e.g. coma, dementia), is – temporarily or permanently – unable to manage their assets properly.
Happy Brexmas?
How to prepare your company for Brexit?
On 10 December 2018, the British Prime Minister decided to postpone the vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons. The risk of a ‘no deal’ disaster scenario is increasing. What are the important dates? On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom formally informed the European Council of its intention to leave the EU (according to the procedure provided in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty). C
A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if
Right to deduct VAT possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares
The Ryanair ruling
Right to deduct VAT also possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares, if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead The European Court of Justice recently confirmed that VAT on costs incurred during the purchase of shares may be deductible even if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead. As such, the Court of Justice has upheld the principle that the preparatory t
What are the options?
The deduction for investment: an illustration of the options
The deduction for investment allows companies and natural persons who earn profits or benefits to reduce their taxable profits by placing part of the acquisition or investment value of investments in new tangible and intangible fixed assets. Depending on the size of your business and the nature of your activities, you can generally apply the regular, one-off deduction for investment of 20% (tem
Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f

Subscribe to our newsletter