Year-end tax optimisations series – advance payments

We are once again entering the final month of the year, and for most companies that also means the last month of the financial year. This is when there is still enough time to optimise numerous issues before the financial year effectively concludes. In this series we will shed light on a number of potential techniques for tax optimisation.

1. Introduction – ratio legis of advance payments

In order to calculate a company’s corporation tax, a corporation must submit a corporation tax return. Companies that keep their books per calendar year generally submit their corporation tax returns in September of the following year. Companies who do not work according to the calendar year must submit their corporation tax returns at the end of the month following the month in which the general meeting is held, with such no later than six months after the end of the financial year.

The tax authorities then calculate the taxes after receiving these returns, and send out an assessment notice based on these. The tax only has to be effectively paid at the end of the second month after the assessment notice was sent, which in many cases is over a year after the conclusion of the relevant financial year. In order to eliminate this ‘cash flow problem’ on the part of the government, the authorities have introduced a system of advance payments that is designed to encourage companies (and other taxpayers) to already pay their taxes during the course of the financial year. 

2. Advance payments

They encourage the taxpayers to do this by raising the calculated taxes by a given percentage. In the 2017 assessment year (2016 financial year) the amount is 1.125 percent. This means that if you do not make advance payments you will have to pay 1.125 percent more in taxes than has been calculated.

But this increase can be avoided by making sufficient advance payments. These advance payments occur in four quarters, with each quarter having its own benefits. For financial years that are not longer or shorter than one year, the first quarter applies to all advance payments made up until the 10th day of the 4th month of the financial year, while quarter two holds for all payments made until the 10th day of the 7th month, quarter three applies until the 10th day of the 10th month and advance payments for the fourth quarter must be received no later than on the 20th day of the final month. If the aforementioned days are during the weekend or on a public holiday, then the final date is the following workday.

There are different benefits for each quarter. For the 2017 assessment year, a benefit of 1.5 percent applies to quarter one, 1.25 percent for quarter two, one percent for quarter 3 and just 0.75 percent for quarter four. These benefits can neutralise the charged increase.

It is however important to remember that at present there will be no increase from a legal perspective if the total increase is less than €40 or less than one percent of the tax to be paid. It is the latter restriction that is troubling the authorities this year. 

3. Limited impact for the current year

Imagine that your company has been paying in the region of €100,000 in taxes for years. The increase due to insufficient advance payments will then be €1,125. You can easily setoff this increase by paying €25,000 in advance every quarter. When taken together with the abovementioned benefits, this will result in a net increase of €0.

But… imagine you only made an advance payment of €10,000 in quarter one, which gives us a benefit of €10,000 x 1.5% = €150. Our net increase is then €1,125 - €150 = €975 or less than one percent of the tax to be paid (100,000 x 1% = 1,000), which means you do not have to pay the increase. That means you can hang on to your hard-earned cash for a bit and just pay the taxman the following year when you receive your assessment notice.

4. Forgot to make the advance payments?

If you’ve forgotten to make your advance payments, then you must work out how much you should pay in advance in quarter four (before 20 December 2016) in order to avoid that increase due to insufficient advance payments. 

Using the same example as above, with €100,000 in expected corporation tax, the increase will be €1,125. As soon as we get the net increase, after being offset with the benefits resulting from the advance payments, to below €1,000 (being one percent of the tax to be paid), the entire increase lapses. So at the very least a benefit of €126 must be obtained at a percentage of 0.75%, which in this example means a minimum advance payment of €16,800 or 16.8 percent.

So if you have forgotten to make advance payments, you can still pay 16.8 percent of your expected corporation tax before 20 December 2016 and you will avoid the increase implemented for insufficient advance payments. Given that the corporation tax ultimately payable cannot of course be accurately estimated before the end of the financial year, it is best to add a safety margin and pay around 20 percent in advance.

5. Legislative amendment

Naturally, the authorities also quickly spotted this benefit, and have already amended the law, which means that the increase on the grounds of insufficient advance payments will always amount to at least 2.25 percent as of the 2018 assessment year. That means it will become a lot more appealing to pay in advance.

Another important aspect in this respect is that the one percent threshold will no longer apply, which means you will always have to pay an increase on the grounds of insufficient advance payments, even if the net increase is less than one percent of the tax to be paid. The €40 threshold will however remain in place. 

6. Conclusion

Even though it does not provide real advantages to make advance payments this year, it is still wise to pay a small portion of your taxes in advance so as to avoid the increase due to insufficient advance payments. As of next year it will once again be an appealing option to make advance payments, thanks to the combination of the percentage being doubled and the fact that the one percent threshold will lapse.

 

Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f
The labour market of the future
Earn (on the side) flexibly and untaxed
There are three legal social statuses in Belgium, (i) employee, (ii) self-employed and (iii) civil servant. However, the question is often asked whether these classifications are still relevant to the rapidly evolving labour market in which flexibility is key and many people opt for a 'freelance status' or wish to combine several statuses. Voka has already called for a debate on the labour mark
Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl

Subscribe to our newsletter