Draft Programme Act submitted: some tax-related topics highlighted

There has been a great deal of hullaballoo in the media in recent months concerning the possible overhauling of the corporation tax system, and for many this was a tense time as they waited to see whether or not these comprehensive reforms would be introduced together with the new year.

But it is now evident from the draft Programme Act, which was published on 7 December 2016, that the thorough overhaul has been put on ice for now.

The major changes to corporation taxes as of 1 January 2017 involve the increase of withholding tax, which we already covered in our last edition, the adjustment to the tax on inter-group profits on shares, increased taxation for company vehicles, the scrapping of the speculation tax and the wider scope of the taxes on stock exchange transactions. We shed light on these changes below.

1. Company vehicles to be more expensive as of 1 January 2017

40% taxable benefit in kind in the non-deductible expenses for reimbursing fuel costs

As of 1 January 2012 a new non-deductible expense was introduced, equal to 17% of the benefit in kind added for use of company vehicles for private purposes.

After 1 January 2017 this non-deductible expense will be increased to 40% of the benefit in kind for those vehicles for which fuel expenses are reimbursed by the company. The draft act does not specifically address fuel cards, which means that other means of reimbursement, such as expense claims, are also being targeted. Moreover, the 40% rate will also apply if the employer only covers a part of the fuel expenses.

Just like the current 17%, the 40% of the benefit in kind is the minimum taxable base for the company, given that no tax deductions can be applied. This means that even loss-making companies could see their corporation taxes head northwards.

Own contribution benefit no longer relevant

Originally it was only those benefits that were reported in form 281 or in the wage certificate that were targeted, and those benefits that were wholly or partially reduced by means of an own contribution did not have to be subjected to the 17% rate, either in their entirety or for part thereof.

This distinction is now set to end, with all benefits henceforth to be subjected to the 17% or 40% rate, irrespective of whether or not an own contribution has been paid. Examples include those benefits that are processed through the current account or that are offset by means of invoicing or through salary payments.

Reference CO2 emissions for 2017

For cars powered by a petrol, LPG or natural gas engine, the reference CO2 emissions is to decrease to 105 g/km. For diesel-powered vehicles the figure stands at 87 g/km.

This decrease will in turn also result in an increase when it comes to taxable benefits in kind.

Company vehicles are just getting costlier for companies

The above tax measures are only the first step towards the overhaul of the mobility budget. It is moreover looking like becoming a general trend that the approach to company vehicles by the tax authorities will become a permanent feature for making up the budget deficit. This means that CO2 emissions and the taxable benefits in kind with regard to these vehicles will in the future be even more significant factors when it comes to deciding on the composition of a company fleet.

In light of these new changes, we believe this is a good time to analyse your company’s current fleet and to take these new factors into account when buying or leasing new vehicles.

2. Tax on inter-group profits on shares

In terms of the contribution of shares from one company to another company by a natural person acting within the framework of the normal management of their private capital, the increase to the fiscally paid capital resulting from such a contribution is to be reinterpreted.

As of 1 January 2017 only that part that is equal to the purchase price of the contributed shares will be deemed to be fiscal capital. This means that the fiscal capital will no longer be equal to the actual value of the shares at the time of the contribution.

The difference between the purchase price and the actual value of the shares will henceforth qualify as a taxed reserve in the capital. When the capital is distributed at a later stage, that portion that pertains to the taxed reserves will then be subject to 30% withholding tax or to a corresponding once-off rate as part of the personal income tax.

The clear intent of the authorities is to use this restriction to prevent inter-group profits being paid out tax-free to the contributor by means of a future capital decrease.

The draft act does not distinguish between contributions to Belgian and foreign companies.

3. Speculation tax to go, while taxes on stock exchange transactions to be extended

The speculation tax that was introduced last year as a levy on the fast sale of listed shares is to be scrapped, after a very short existence indeed.

But the scope of the tax on stock exchange transactions is to be widened to include investments abroad, while the current ceiling for the tax is to be doubled.

Starting on 1 January 2017 the following maximum sums will be applicable under the draft act:

  • €1,300 for the sale and purchase of bonds
  • €1,600 for the sale and purchase of other securities
  • €4,000 for the sale and purchase of capitalisation shares

In principle, the above changes have to be published by the end of this month in order to take effect from 1 January 2017.

We will keep you updated.

Does the new definition of a company have any consequences for your organisation?
Broader requirements for registration with the CBE - clarification for unincorporated companies
In a previous article, we explained that the introduction of a definition of 'company' in the new Companies and Associations Code (CAC) also affects the registration with the CBE (Crossroads Bank for Enterprises). In this article, we will discuss in more detail the registration obligation for unincorporated companies.  Consequences of the broader definition of a company  With the new
Noticeable impact on tax matters
Impact of Brexit on registration and inheritance tax
The tension in the United Kingdom is palpable. In the meantime, the initial date of Brexit, 29 March 2019, has been delayed. Depending on whether an agreement will be reached or not on 29 March, UK's departure date will be moved to 12 April 2019 in case of a hard Brexit (no deal) and to 22 May 2019 in case of a soft Brexit (deal). It is clear that Brexit will have an impact on tax matters, bo
An easing-up for most SMEs
New interest deduction restriction mostly offers opportunities
As part of the reforms to corporation tax in late 2017, a new interest deduction restriction was also introduced. This is part of the second phase of the reform, meaning that it applies in principle to financial years starting on or after 1 January 2019 (assessment year 2020). The new interest deduction restriction was introduced in the transposition of the European Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (A
Some important dates highlighted
The new Companies and Associations Code
The new company and association law had already been announced for some time, and it was approved by the Chamber on 28 February 2019. Below we give a brief explanation of some of the important dates associated with the entry into force of this new legislation.   Introduction of the new legislation  The law introducing the Companies' Code enters into force on 1 May 2019 and repea
The new rules for VAT processing of vouchers
The wonderful world of VAT and vouchers
Vouchers are a very popular marketing tool. There are various types of vouchers: discount vouchers issued by a manufacturer, redeemable at any sales outlet in Belgium, discount coupons issued free of charge by retailers, vouchers where you can get a newly launched article free of charge, gift vouchers that can be redeemed for a whole range of products or services, electronic vouchers, etc. Are yo
A showpiece, or rather a sticking plaster for a broken arm?
The Belgian fiscal consolidation regime
The general intention with the introduction of a fiscal consolidation regime was clear, namely to put the Belgian tax system back in a positive light. After all, many of our neighbouring countries have had a system of fiscal consolidation in place for many years, and Belgium consequently scored badly on this point when international groups were looking to choose an investment location. The ques
The long-term lease revival
Superficies as stealth usufruct?
A noteworthy judgement was recently handed down by the Court of Appeal of Brussels regarding the taxation of overly cheap accession in the case of superficies (23 January 2019). In the past, a number of rulings had already been made on this subject (see, inter alia, Court in Ghent of 31 October 2017). The tax authorities are clearly keen to see the end of the right of superficies, and the two judg
'Paulian claim' to the rescue
Thwarting the taxman by rejecting an inheritance: is it possible?
In inheritance law, multiple heirs can have a statutory inheritance claim. As such, they are entitled to a minimum share of the inheritance. Since the new inheritance law, it is possible to freely dispose of half of one's assets. This is called the available part. If the available part is exceeded by donations, the statutory heirs may request the reduction. Through the reduction, the statutory hei
Appointing a Belgian fiscal representative is necessary
BREXIT: Important VAT news for UK companies with a Belgian VAT number
The Belgian VAT authorities confirmed that UK companies with a direct Belgian VAT registration need to appoint a Belgian fiscal representative for VAT purposes before 30/03/2019. This is in case of a no-deal Brexit on that date. The VAT administration will allow these UK companies to maintain their current Belgian VAT number, also after appointing a fiscal representative for VAT purposes. 
Legally most correct solution
Successive usufruct: The Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel) confirms the method of levying the registration duties
On 10 December 2018, a remarkable position was published on the Vlabel website (Position no 18083 of 26 November 2018). The real estate tax system is becoming more and more sophisticated with more (tax) advantages. The question must therefore be asked whether the well-known "simple" usufruct will not be partially replaced by transactions with a double or successive usufruct. In the area of registr

Subscribe to our newsletter