Draft Programme Act submitted: some tax-related topics highlighted

There has been a great deal of hullaballoo in the media in recent months concerning the possible overhauling of the corporation tax system, and for many this was a tense time as they waited to see whether or not these comprehensive reforms would be introduced together with the new year.

But it is now evident from the draft Programme Act, which was published on 7 December 2016, that the thorough overhaul has been put on ice for now.

The major changes to corporation taxes as of 1 January 2017 involve the increase of withholding tax, which we already covered in our last edition, the adjustment to the tax on inter-group profits on shares, increased taxation for company vehicles, the scrapping of the speculation tax and the wider scope of the taxes on stock exchange transactions. We shed light on these changes below.

1. Company vehicles to be more expensive as of 1 January 2017

40% taxable benefit in kind in the non-deductible expenses for reimbursing fuel costs

As of 1 January 2012 a new non-deductible expense was introduced, equal to 17% of the benefit in kind added for use of company vehicles for private purposes.

After 1 January 2017 this non-deductible expense will be increased to 40% of the benefit in kind for those vehicles for which fuel expenses are reimbursed by the company. The draft act does not specifically address fuel cards, which means that other means of reimbursement, such as expense claims, are also being targeted. Moreover, the 40% rate will also apply if the employer only covers a part of the fuel expenses.

Just like the current 17%, the 40% of the benefit in kind is the minimum taxable base for the company, given that no tax deductions can be applied. This means that even loss-making companies could see their corporation taxes head northwards.

Own contribution benefit no longer relevant

Originally it was only those benefits that were reported in form 281 or in the wage certificate that were targeted, and those benefits that were wholly or partially reduced by means of an own contribution did not have to be subjected to the 17% rate, either in their entirety or for part thereof.

This distinction is now set to end, with all benefits henceforth to be subjected to the 17% or 40% rate, irrespective of whether or not an own contribution has been paid. Examples include those benefits that are processed through the current account or that are offset by means of invoicing or through salary payments.

Reference CO2 emissions for 2017

For cars powered by a petrol, LPG or natural gas engine, the reference CO2 emissions is to decrease to 105 g/km. For diesel-powered vehicles the figure stands at 87 g/km.

This decrease will in turn also result in an increase when it comes to taxable benefits in kind.

Company vehicles are just getting costlier for companies

The above tax measures are only the first step towards the overhaul of the mobility budget. It is moreover looking like becoming a general trend that the approach to company vehicles by the tax authorities will become a permanent feature for making up the budget deficit. This means that CO2 emissions and the taxable benefits in kind with regard to these vehicles will in the future be even more significant factors when it comes to deciding on the composition of a company fleet.

In light of these new changes, we believe this is a good time to analyse your company’s current fleet and to take these new factors into account when buying or leasing new vehicles.

2. Tax on inter-group profits on shares

In terms of the contribution of shares from one company to another company by a natural person acting within the framework of the normal management of their private capital, the increase to the fiscally paid capital resulting from such a contribution is to be reinterpreted.

As of 1 January 2017 only that part that is equal to the purchase price of the contributed shares will be deemed to be fiscal capital. This means that the fiscal capital will no longer be equal to the actual value of the shares at the time of the contribution.

The difference between the purchase price and the actual value of the shares will henceforth qualify as a taxed reserve in the capital. When the capital is distributed at a later stage, that portion that pertains to the taxed reserves will then be subject to 30% withholding tax or to a corresponding once-off rate as part of the personal income tax.

The clear intent of the authorities is to use this restriction to prevent inter-group profits being paid out tax-free to the contributor by means of a future capital decrease.

The draft act does not distinguish between contributions to Belgian and foreign companies.

3. Speculation tax to go, while taxes on stock exchange transactions to be extended

The speculation tax that was introduced last year as a levy on the fast sale of listed shares is to be scrapped, after a very short existence indeed.

But the scope of the tax on stock exchange transactions is to be widened to include investments abroad, while the current ceiling for the tax is to be doubled.

Starting on 1 January 2017 the following maximum sums will be applicable under the draft act:

  • €1,300 for the sale and purchase of bonds
  • €1,600 for the sale and purchase of other securities
  • €4,000 for the sale and purchase of capitalisation shares

In principle, the above changes have to be published by the end of this month in order to take effect from 1 January 2017.

We will keep you updated.

Legally most correct solution
Successive usufruct: The Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel) confirms the method of levying the registration duties
On 10 December 2018, a remarkable position was published on the Vlabel website (Position no 18083 of 26 November 2018). The real estate tax system is becoming more and more sophisticated with more (tax) advantages. The question must therefore be asked whether the well-known "simple" usufruct will not be partially replaced by transactions with a double or successive usufruct. In the area of registr
From 1 January 2019
New Flemish Lease Decree
On 24 October 2018, the Flemish Parliament approved the new Flemish Lease Decree. In our newsletter of 26 October 2017, we already hinted at the changes that this new decree will bring about. One of the most important changes remains the decree's broad scope. On the one hand, extensive regulations are provided for the rental of a house intended as a main residence. What is new here is that the ter
Confirmed in writing to our office
Confirmed: both usufructuary and bare owner are to be included in the UBO register
The Belgian Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) register went live on 31 October 2018. On the basis of the legal texts and the explanatory notes, as ultimate beneficiary/ies of companies, the natural person(s) who directly or indirectly hold(s) a sufficient percentage of the voting rights or of the ownership interest in this company must first be notified. A holding of at least 25% is an indication of
The advantage is a taxable benefit
Fiches and withholding tax on benefits granted by foreign companies
Should payments received from a foreign company be subject to withholding tax and should this be declared on a fiche? At the moment, the answer to this question is negative in most situations, but this is set to change. A new draft law dated 18 December 2018 provides for the introduction of a tax fiction that requires the (Belgian) employer of the beneficiary employee not only to withhold withh
The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg
More specific: matrimonial property law
A new compensation obligation in the legal system
What if a spouse practices his profession in a company whose shares all form part of his separate property? The Act of 22 July 2018 has introduced considerable changes to matrimonial property law. This article addresses a specific addition to that law, namely the possible disadvantage incurred by the matrimonial property when a spouse practices their profession through their own company1. 
Changes in the cary proxy and usufruct
Estate planning: recent developments
Over the last few months, we have regularly reported on the important changes in estate planning and inheritance planning. Below is an update of some of those changes.   The care proxy: secure your estate for later The classic example is a person who, due to a physical or mental limitation (e.g. coma, dementia), is – temporarily or permanently – unable to manage their assets properly.
Happy Brexmas?
How to prepare your company for Brexit?
On 10 December 2018, the British Prime Minister decided to postpone the vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons. The risk of a ‘no deal’ disaster scenario is increasing. What are the important dates? On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom formally informed the European Council of its intention to leave the EU (according to the procedure provided in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty). C
A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if

Subscribe to our newsletter