Don’t forget your advance payment for December 2016!

Taxpayers who submit their VAT returns monthly must check annually whether or not they are required to pay the December advance for VAT payable on transactions performed during the month of December.

1. Introduction

This obligation is only applicable to those submitting their returns monthly, and taxpayers who submit their returns every quarter can thus disregard the measure. The latter group are anyway already obliged to pay an advance on the VAT payable for the fourth calendar quarter.

If a December advance is payable, then the sum must be paid by 23 December 2016 at the latest into the account of the tax authorities. The same payment instructions apply to this as for the monthly VAT payments.

2. How do I determine the sum of the advance?

The taxpayer can choose between two ‘methods’ for determining the sum of the advance payment:

  1. Either the VAT that is effectively payable for transactions performed between 1 and 20 December is calculated;
  2. Or the sum of the payable VAT, as stated on the VAT return for November, is taken into account.

The second method is the easiest one, given that it is based on the VAT return for November, which must be submitted no later than on 20 December. The sum stated in section 71 of the November VAT return is thus simply paid twice.

On the other hand, the first method requires that an interim VAT return be compiled for the period between 1 and 20 December, and the advance payment is determined, just like with the normal VAT return, by taking the difference between the payable VAT and the deductible VAT.

3. Can one optimise?

While the first method may require more work, a comparison of the two could be well worth your while. That’s because the method that means a lower advance VAT payment also means an improved cash flow. 

The method that is best for each taxpayer depends on their specific situation. Weighing up whether the effort involved in employing the first method is worth the advantage it could provide can also play an important role in this respect.

The December advance that is paid is later set off against that actual VAT payable for the month of December 2016 and can thus be demanded back by an express application for such (using the VAT return), insofar as the conditions for this are fulfilled. This December advance can naturally also be set off against future payable VAT sums.

A VAT credit balance of at least €245 is enough to demand a VAT refund at the end of the calendar year.

4. How do the tax authorities know which method I used?

The tax authorities can see which method the taxpayer used from section 91 of the VAT return for December (to be submitted on 20 January of the following year at the latest).

If the advance payment was determined using the second method – i.e. based on the transactions performed in November – then section 91 must be left blank.

However, if the first method was used – based on the VAT payable for the period between 1 and 20 December – then the sum of the advance payment must be stated in section 91. Moreover, an annexe must be compiled containing the calculation for the December advance payment that must be included when the VAT return for December is submitted.
Please note that, if the first method is used and no advance is payable, then you must state ‘0.00’ in section 91. If you do not do so, the tax authorities will assume that you opted for the second method, and you could lose out if the VAT return for November meant that you owed VAT.

5. What happens if I ‘forget’ to pay an advance?

If the December advance payment is not made or not made in time and/or if section 91 of the VAT return is wrongly filled in or left blank, as a result of which the tax authorities are incorrectly informed of the method employed, this can result in late-payment interest amounting to 0.8% on the sum of the VAT advance payment.

Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and
The 'use and enjoyment" rules explained
Freight transport and closely associated services: new rules clarified in a circular
On 31 October 2017, (previous) Royal Decree No 57, which deals with the freight transport services Department and related services, was replaced by a new RD which came into force on 23 November 2017. It clarifies the former RD in part while introducing a new rule. In order to clarify and discuss the (new) rules, the tax authorities published an administrative circular in this regard on 31 May 2018
Guidelines
Substantial changes in the obligations for partnerships
The Company Law Reform, published on 27 April 2018, is making a number of changes in the Companies Code and the Code of Economic Law. These new regulations will enter into force on 1 November 2018. A few rules will also change for partnerships. Although some clarifications will still be published, we would already like to provide the following guidelines. Changes in the Companies Code A first
Quickly detect system risks
Without a Legal Entity Identifier your company will not be trading on the stock market in 2018
  As from 3 January 2018, every legal entity that buys or sells financial instruments must have a Legal Entity Identifier or LEI. Legal Entity Identifier A LEI is a 20-digit alpha-numeric code enabling quick identification of legal entities that are active on the (international or local) financial markets. The LEI enables regulators to quickly detect system risks. Registrati
A summary of the main points
Immovable property leases to include VAT
  Although currently there is just a draft bill on this issue, which obviously can be subject to change in the meantime, we would like to summarize the main points of the upcoming revolution in the VAT landscape: immovable property leases may become subject to VAT. History Until recently, immovable property leases have – in principle – been exempt from VAT (section 44, paragr
UBO = Ultimate Beneficial Owner
The UBO register: new disclosure requirements planned for your company’s administrative body
As a result of the insertion of sections 14(1) and 14(2) into the Belgian Companies Code all companies must in the future obtain adequate, accurate and current information about their ‘ultimate beneficial owners’ (UBOs) and record the data in the new ‘UBO Register’, a central register containing data about companies and the natural persons behind them. In view of the unwavering atte
Introduction of the matrimonial property law
Is it the end of the final set-off clause or is it getting new life?
  Much has been said about the final set-off clause in recent years. After the Court of Cassation in 2017 ruled in favour of the tax payer that the claim was deductible in the scope of the payable succession duties, the Flemish regulator decided to come to the aid of the tax authorities by changing the law. What is a final set-off clause and how does it work? Many spouses married un
Also the unequal treatment gets reviewed
Benefit in kind for housing: how to anticipate the higher or lower scenario?
Discrimination as regards the benefit in kind for housing has been highlighted on several occasions. Specifically, it relates to the unequal treatment of the same benefits, whether in terms of provision by a sole trader or provision by a legal person. In the most common cases, the benefit arising from being a limited company is almost four times more expensive taxation-wise than the benefit arisin
To reduce the financial burden
Start-up reduction on social security contributions for self-employed persons
The start-up reduction was part of the 'Summer agreement' and took effect on 1 April 2018. With this initiative, the government intends to reduce the financial burden of self-employed persons in start-ups, who often have low incomes at the start of their activity, thereby stimulating entrepreneurship.  Which self-employed persons are eligible?  The reduction measure applies to all se

Subscribe to our newsletter