Don’t forget your advance payment for December 2016!

Taxpayers who submit their VAT returns monthly must check annually whether or not they are required to pay the December advance for VAT payable on transactions performed during the month of December.

1. Introduction

This obligation is only applicable to those submitting their returns monthly, and taxpayers who submit their returns every quarter can thus disregard the measure. The latter group are anyway already obliged to pay an advance on the VAT payable for the fourth calendar quarter.

If a December advance is payable, then the sum must be paid by 23 December 2016 at the latest into the account of the tax authorities. The same payment instructions apply to this as for the monthly VAT payments.

2. How do I determine the sum of the advance?

The taxpayer can choose between two ‘methods’ for determining the sum of the advance payment:

  1. Either the VAT that is effectively payable for transactions performed between 1 and 20 December is calculated;
  2. Or the sum of the payable VAT, as stated on the VAT return for November, is taken into account.

The second method is the easiest one, given that it is based on the VAT return for November, which must be submitted no later than on 20 December. The sum stated in section 71 of the November VAT return is thus simply paid twice.

On the other hand, the first method requires that an interim VAT return be compiled for the period between 1 and 20 December, and the advance payment is determined, just like with the normal VAT return, by taking the difference between the payable VAT and the deductible VAT.

3. Can one optimise?

While the first method may require more work, a comparison of the two could be well worth your while. That’s because the method that means a lower advance VAT payment also means an improved cash flow. 

The method that is best for each taxpayer depends on their specific situation. Weighing up whether the effort involved in employing the first method is worth the advantage it could provide can also play an important role in this respect.

The December advance that is paid is later set off against that actual VAT payable for the month of December 2016 and can thus be demanded back by an express application for such (using the VAT return), insofar as the conditions for this are fulfilled. This December advance can naturally also be set off against future payable VAT sums.

A VAT credit balance of at least €245 is enough to demand a VAT refund at the end of the calendar year.

4. How do the tax authorities know which method I used?

The tax authorities can see which method the taxpayer used from section 91 of the VAT return for December (to be submitted on 20 January of the following year at the latest).

If the advance payment was determined using the second method – i.e. based on the transactions performed in November – then section 91 must be left blank.

However, if the first method was used – based on the VAT payable for the period between 1 and 20 December – then the sum of the advance payment must be stated in section 91. Moreover, an annexe must be compiled containing the calculation for the December advance payment that must be included when the VAT return for December is submitted.
Please note that, if the first method is used and no advance is payable, then you must state ‘0.00’ in section 91. If you do not do so, the tax authorities will assume that you opted for the second method, and you could lose out if the VAT return for November meant that you owed VAT.

5. What happens if I ‘forget’ to pay an advance?

If the December advance payment is not made or not made in time and/or if section 91 of the VAT return is wrongly filled in or left blank, as a result of which the tax authorities are incorrectly informed of the method employed, this can result in late-payment interest amounting to 0.8% on the sum of the VAT advance payment.

Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f
The labour market of the future
Earn (on the side) flexibly and untaxed
There are three legal social statuses in Belgium, (i) employee, (ii) self-employed and (iii) civil servant. However, the question is often asked whether these classifications are still relevant to the rapidly evolving labour market in which flexibility is key and many people opt for a 'freelance status' or wish to combine several statuses. Voka has already called for a debate on the labour mark
Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl

Subscribe to our newsletter