Is it (fiscally) appealing to gift immoveable property?

In 2015 the Flemish government drastically cut the gift tax rates on immoveable property. There was an almost immediate rise in the gifting of property, a trend that has continued in 2016, according to the figures. There are also plans for amending the inheritance and matrimonial property laws, while there have been proposals to cut the rates for inheritance tax for collateral relatives and between non-relatives. All these measures will undoubtedly lead to new and adjusted asset planning.

1. New rates have led to more gifts
As of 1 July 2015 the tax rates for gifts of immoveable property were reformed and reduced. Two aspects were subject to the reform: the categories for the recipients were simplified and the tax rates were cut. The scheme was later adopted by the Brussels Capital-Region and the Walloon Region, which introduced a number of (more limited) amendments.

The table below provides an overview of the new rates for gift tax:

For a residence worth €150,000 the rate is still 3%, while previously it could have amounted 10% (for direct line rates). If the residence was gifted to family members not in the ‘direct line’ the rate today will be 10%, while previously it could reach 65%.

An example further illustrates the changes:

A married couple, married under a regime of community of property comprising only of property acquired after their marriage, own an investment property that is worth €800,000 and wish to give it to their 2 children.

Under the former scheme, the gift tax would amount to €70,500, with each of the children consequently having to pay €35,250.

If the parents did not give them the property, and the children simply inherited it, total inheritance tax of €60,000 would be payable (if the parents died simultaneously), with each of the children having to pay €30,000.So simply leaving things be and letting the apartment be inherited in due course was around €10,000 more advantageous than gifting it. And so it made sense that very few people decided to give immoveable property away.

Under the new scheme, however, the total gift tax is down to €36,000, making gifts a lot more appealing.

The cut to the rates has now led to a considerable increase in the number of immoveable properties that are gifted. Until the close of last October over 15,300 instruments of gift were executed, for a total sum of 2.3 billion euros (source: Notaris.be), and a great many more gifts are expected to follow before the end of the year.

Flemish Minister of Finance and Budget Bart Tommelein has voiced his satisfaction, calling it a ‘win-win-win situation’, as it benefits citizens, the economy and the Flemish government. Now that immoveable assets are more frequently transferred while the owner is still alive, the revenues are also received by the Flemish authorities more quickly.

The cut to the rates has led to new opportunities for planning your assets, and making gifts of immoveable property is certainly worth considering. However, it remains an exercise where every case must be examined individually as, outside of the financial and tax aspects, there are numerous other factors that must be weighed up. Just a few examples:

  • what is the true individual situation?
  • what are your future expectations?
  • how many buildings do you own, what are they worth and will you purchase more?
  • what type of immoveable property is involved?
  • what is the age of the grantor and the recipient?

These are all questions that should first be discussed in a personal consultation before deciding on whether or not immoveable property should be gifted.

2. What does the future hold?
Aside from the reduction of the gift tax, steps have also been taken to update our inheritance law, and there have been proposals to cut the high inheritance taxation, especially rates for collateral relatives and between non-relatives.

For further information, you can always contact our Estate Planning team.

Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f
The labour market of the future
Earn (on the side) flexibly and untaxed
There are three legal social statuses in Belgium, (i) employee, (ii) self-employed and (iii) civil servant. However, the question is often asked whether these classifications are still relevant to the rapidly evolving labour market in which flexibility is key and many people opt for a 'freelance status' or wish to combine several statuses. Voka has already called for a debate on the labour mark
Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl

Subscribe to our newsletter