The new deduction for innovation revenue explained

As a result of the BEPS action plan Belgium had to assess its existing patent box against the principles contained in the OECD recommendations and introduce any required changes by 30 June 2016. The result was that the existing patent income deduction was abolished and replaced by a new deduction for innovation revenue.

A brief history
The summer of 2016 saw the end of the Belgian tax-friendly regime for income from intellectual property (IP) rights as we had known it. Thanks to this preferential regime – the so-called ‘patent box’ – companies were able to deduct 80% of their gross revenue from patents from their profits for the taxable period. So tax for this patent income amounted to 33.99% of 20% of the revenue, which boiled down to actual taxation of a mere 6.80%.

The OECD’s BEPS plan (action 5) meant that member states were required to review, no later than by 30 June 2016, their preferential regimes for income from intellectual property obtained through research and development activities. As of 1 July 2016 the OECD member states were expected to have reformed their IP regimes so that they complied with the principles set out in the OECD recommendations.

During the cabinet meeting on 2 December 2016 the governing parties reached an agreement on the new IP regime that will henceforth be named the ‘deduction for innovation revenue’, which is applicable as of 1 July 2016. Income derived from patents that are applied for as of 1 July 2016 as well as adjusted patents and licences obtained after 1 July 2016 will consequently no longer be subject to the old patent box. For taxpayers whose income from intellectual property benefitted from the old patent box before 1 July 2016, a transitional scheme of 5 years (until 30 June 2021) has been introduced.

The draft bill was passed by parliament on 2 February. On 20 February the law introducing the deduction for innovation revenue was published in the Belgian Official Journal, and it was effective as of 1 July 2016.

The most significant characteristics of the new deduction for innovation revenue are as follows:

1. Qualifying beneficiaries
The new deduction for innovation revenue applies to Belgian companies or permanent Belgian establishments of foreign companies that are the full owner, co-owner, usufructuary or licence or (exclusive) rights holder thereof.

2. Qualifying intellectual property rights
The new deduction for innovation revenue has a wider scope than the old patent box (which was limited to patents and supplementary rights alone, which ostensibly excluded the entire software industry from the deduction). The deduction for innovation revenue is applicable to the following intellectual property rights:

  • patents or supplementary protection certificates;
  • plant variety rights;
  • orphan medicinal products;
  • data or market exclusivity;
  • copyright-protected software: as long as it is the result of a research & development project or programme as defined in the facility for the partial exemption of the payment of withholding tax for scientific research or as long as binding advice is received from BELSPO (Belgian Science Policy). The software cannot have generated any income prior to 1 July 2016. Any changes or upgrades to software that existed prior to 1 July 2016 that result in income after 1 July 2016 is eligible, but only for that income that is due to the change or upgrade.

The new deduction can be applied to income from intellectual property rights irrespective of the country in which the product, service or method receives protection. This new regime is applicable (with the exception of patents that could already benefit from the patent box) insofar as the above-mentioned rights were obtained or applied for after 1 July 2016.

It is important to also note that a part of the profits can already be exempted as of the time that an application for an intellectual property right is submitted, while the patent box could only be employed for a recognised patent. In this event a temporary exemption shall be awarded by means of an exempted reserve, in anticipation of the final approval of the intellectual right (subject to the repayment thereof if the intellectual property right is not awarded).

3. Qualifying income
The deduction for innovation revenue is applicable to income from qualifying intellectual property rights. When compared to the previous patent box, the new version includes a much wider range when it comes to qualifying incomes: licensing payments, royalties included in the price of (protected) goods or services, royalties for (protected) products or methods included in the ‘production process’ of commercialised goods or services, income from the sale of intellectual property rights and compensation resulting from an intellectual property right infringement.

4. Calculating the deduction for innovation revenue:
Rate
The deduction for innovation revenue allows for 85% (compared to 80% under the patent box) of the net income (compared to the gross income under the patent box) derived from intellectual property to be deducted from the tax base of the company or permanent establishment for its corporation tax.

Deduction of net income
The deduction for innovation income is calculated using the net sum of the income from intellectual property rights. This means that the expenses incurred by the company or permanent establishment for research & development for the year concerned are deducted from the revenue from intellectual rights. Moreover, the historical expenses incurred for research & development in previous taxable periods (insofar as those periods end after 30 June 2016) must also be deducted. When it comes to historical costs, the law allows for them to be spread across a maximum of seven tax years, which means that taxpayers who have incurred significant costs and investments in the start-up phase can still benefit from the favourable tax-environment in respect of the revenue generated by their intellectual property rights. The choice of spreading the historical costs and the number of years over which they are depreciated are irrevocable. Should the deduction of the aforementioned research & development costs from the revenue lead to a negative balance, then this balance is carried forward to following years.

The Nexus approach
The biggest change introduced by the new tax regime for deductions for innovation revenue is that the calculation of the new deduction is linked to the so-called Nexus fraction, an amendment that legislators were compelled to introduce on the basis of the directives released by the OECD within the scope of the BEPS plan. The goal of this directive is to retain tax-friendly regimes for companies that have sufficient economic substance at a local level.

In concrete terms this means that the calculation of the deduction will be subjected to a fraction that represents the ratio between the costs for the research & development activities the company has performed itself (the numerator) and the total research & development costs (the denominator). The expenditure on research & development activities performed by the company itself also includes those costs paid to unaffiliated companies, or paid to an affiliated company if it pays the received remuneration to an unaffiliated company without deducting a margin. The numerator of the Nexus ratio will be automatically increased by 30% (called ‘up-lift’), but can never exceed the total sum of the costs incurred for research & development in the denominator. In order to compile this Nexus fraction, all expenditure for research & development in preceding taxable periods must be included and retained without restriction.

Finally, it must be noted that the Nexus approach is considered as a rebuttable presumption. If a taxpayer can demonstrate that the fraction will lead to a lower deduction for innovation revenue on the basis of actual elements, then one can apply for a deviation from the Nexus fraction. Such a deviation will only be permissible by means of a Advance Ruling.

5. Administrative obligations
The new deduction for innovation revenue entails administrative compliance and a documentation obligation that must not be underestimated by taxpayers who wish to employ the regime. Innovation revenue as well as the expenditure directly related thereto (for determining the Nexus fraction) must be determined separately for each intellectual property right. Exceptionally, it can be permitted that the obligation in respect of documentation is kept updated for each type of product or service developed. In order to comply with these administrative obligations a specific form shall have to be added to the corporation tax return, both for SMEs and for larger companies.

6. Processing the deduction for innovation revenue
The deduction for innovation revenue in the corporation tax return shall be processed after the processing of the definitively taxed income deduction and prior to the processing of the notional interest deduction.

The unused balance of the deduction for innovation revenue can (as opposed to the patent box) be wholly carried forward to following tax years.

Neither will the deduction be henceforth lost in the event of a company restructuring (merger, demerger, etc.) on the part of the taxpayer concerned.

In conclusion, we also note that the application of the deduction for innovation revenue does not threaten the application of the investment deduction with respect to the same intellectual property right.

7. Choosing between the old and new regimes for revenue from intellectual property rights
Some taxpayers shall be able to opt for the transitional scheme of the former patent box or for the new deduction for innovation revenue for certain intellectual property rights. Depending on the specific characteristics of each case and, more specifically, the structure of certain corporate groups, it could in some cases be more advantageous to opt for the former patent box. When a taxpayer settles on the transitional scheme of the old patent box, this is an irrevocable choice and the taxpayer will be unable to switch to the deduction for innovation revenue regime before 30 June 2021.

Finally, it is handy to know that some taxpayers will have to apply both the ‘old’ patent box and the ‘new’ deduction for innovation revenue in the same tax return, which is possible as long as this is not done for the same property rights.

A summary of the major differences between the old and the new regimes:

 

Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f
The labour market of the future
Earn (on the side) flexibly and untaxed
There are three legal social statuses in Belgium, (i) employee, (ii) self-employed and (iii) civil servant. However, the question is often asked whether these classifications are still relevant to the rapidly evolving labour market in which flexibility is key and many people opt for a 'freelance status' or wish to combine several statuses. Voka has already called for a debate on the labour mark
Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl

Subscribe to our newsletter