Prejudgement administrative attachment for VAT gets repackaged

One of the measures used in the battle against tax fraud involves the amendment of the extant regulations for prejudgement attachments that VAT officials can levy on moveable property when, during an inspection, they have established that there are matters that indicate major fraud (organised or not). An example would be when they encounter goods in a warehouse that have been part of a carousel scam. The draft bill dated 10 April concerning the amendment of the law is presently still before the House, but in the meantime we have provided an overview of the existing and new rules below.   

What were the shortcomings of the extant regulation? 
The taxman has been able to use this weapon to combat (primarily) carousel fraud (a form of intra-Community fraud) since 2007. When the authorities unearth ‘suspect goods’ during an inspection for which there is a reasonable suspicion that the VAT rules were not complied with because the intervening party (the buyer, supplier, service provider, etc) is impossible to identify, or they are unable to identify the origin, quantity, price or value of those goods, then they can attach this property and the means of transport as a prejudgement measure (present article 52bis of the VAT Code). While this might guarantee the payment of VAT, as soon as the intervening party is identified or the origin, quantity, price or value is ascertained that attachment must be lifted.  

A parliamentary committee of inquiry into major tax fraud cases has however recommended that the procedure for this prejudgement administrative attachment be refined. That is because its many shortcomings meant the procedure was not used as it could be for acting against tax cheats in real-time and with effect. Fraudsters can easily use the loopholes in the law or an as-yet-undiscovered construction that is used intensively over a short period to keep their ill-gotten gains out of the clutches of the courts and tax authorities. That is why prejudgement administrative attachment is being repackaged. Below we outline the new rules included in the draft bill.  

When can prejudgement administrative attachment be levied? 
Under the new regulations VAT officials will be able to levy prejudgement administrative attachment when, while auditing a taxpayer, they establish the existence of acts that suggest major fraud has been committed and that contributed to the contravention of VAT legislation. This means that the new regulations evidently narrow the scope of the prejudgement administrative attachment, given that indications of whether or not serious organised fraud has been committed shall be a prerequisite.  

Which goods can be the subject of a prejudgement administrative attachment? 
While under current legislation only the suspect goods themselves (such as goods bought on the black market or goods bought with fictitious invoices) and their means of transport can be the subject of a prejudgement administrative attachment, the scope of the measure will be widened considerably in this respect. In the future prejudgement administrative attachment can be levied on all moveable property that is found at the taxpayer’s and for which it is not demonstrated that it belongs exclusively to another party in the course of the investigation – irrespective of whether or not these goods are connected to the major fraud. This widening of the scope is understandable, given that the intention of the measure was to be able to collect tax at a later stage that was dodged by means of major fraud and to prevent the cheats from claiming they are insolvent the moment that the tax is demanded.  

But the provisions of article 1408, sections 1 and 2 of the Judicial Code, where it is summarised which essential and highly personal property cannot be attached, remain in effect when it comes to the prejudgement administrative attachment. So, for example, a bed, clothing, a cupboard, a washing machine, etc, cannot be attached.   

What procedure is followed? 
In order to prevent a prejudgement administrative attachment being declared void, a strict procedure has to be followed that is bound by mandatory time limits in order to protect the taxpayer against arbitrary interference in his or her ownership rights and to stop investigations from being put on the backburner. The rules of common attachment law are applicable, except for where the tax rules deviate therefrom. As with the extant regulations, the VAT officials must draft an attachment report, but henceforth it will have to contain a larger number of obligatory statements than was previously the case. For an overview of the required statements, click here.

In principle the VAT officials must, at the time of levying a prejudgement attachment, immediately hand a copy of this attachment report to the attachee against receipt. If it is not possible to serve this copy immediately on-site, then it must be sent to the attachee within 14 days by registered letter. Should this not be done the attachment can be reversed. Next, the issuing officials must draft an attachment notice and send it to the attachee within three workdays (of the attachment report being handed over or served on the attachee).  

Within two months of the attachment report the attaching court must uphold the validity of the attachment (under the current regulations this must be done within one month), in order to protect the attachee who is faced with the immediate impact of the attachment as soon as it is levied by the tax authorities. The proceedings before the attaching court are, just as they were before, instituted by a unilateral application and its ruling is provisionally enforceable. The attaching court shall, inter alia, examine whether the value of the attached property is not disproportional in respect of a tax debt that is established and fixed or subject to a provisional estimate, and where necessary shall amend the attachment if that is the case or if the circumstances have changed.  

Once the attachment has been declared valid by an attaching court, and within three months of the attachment report being served, a writ of execution must, subject to being declared void, be issued for the sum payable for which the attachment was levied. The notification/service of this writ of execution means that the prejudgement attachment is automatically converted into an attachment in execution.  

What legal remedies are available for fighting the attachment? 
When a debtor who is the subject of an attachment believes that the conditions for imposing a prejudgement administrative attachment were not met, he or she can appeal the attachment through the attaching court in order to have the attachment lifted or amended. For such an appeal to be allowable, it must be instituted within three months of receipt of the attachment report or of the registered letter being sent. The appeal is treated as interim injunction proceedings, and as long as it is ongoing the attachment remains prejudgement in nature. It is perfectly possible that the attaching court deals with the attachee’s appeal at the same time as the affirmation of the validity of the attachment. The attached debtor can however also demand of the attaching court the lifting or amendment of the attachment after this three-month appeal period if he or she can demonstrate that the conditions under which the attachment was levied have changed.  

What are the consequences?   
A prejudgement attachment is effective as soon as the attachment report is issued to the attachee or he or she is notified thereof by registered letter. The attached property may not be sold or encumbered for a period of three years.   

Conclusion 
The intention of the new regulations is to get VAT officials to make greater use of this measure in the future in order to guarantee payment of unpaid VAT, but of course it remains to be seen whether this will actually be the case. The procedural course to be negotiated by the VAT officials – subject to being declared void – when levying a prejudgement administrative attachment will however be a rich hunting ground for many a lawyer who will punish even the smallest error committed by the taxman with having the attachment invalidated. On the other hand, a properly issued and mandatory procedure is highly desirable, as it offers attachees the protection they need against what can be very drastic actions on the part of the tax authorities. 

The legal literature is already rightly commenting that the requirement that a tax debt that is established and fixed or subject to a provisional estimate must exist, and which is required to be stated in the attachment report, raises the suspicion that a prejudgement administrative attachment will not be possible for outstanding VAT that was disputed from the very start. After all, if it is disputed it can hardly be established and fixed. We will wait and see how the attaching court will interpret this condition when an attachee disputes the existence of the outstanding VAT, or in any event the estimate thereof, from the start.    

Prejudgement administrative attachment is a powerful weapon for combating actual cases of major fraud, but in future one will have to take care that this drastic measure is not triggered too quickly. And while there are built-in protections for the attachee, they are always retrospective. In the period between prejudgement attachment being levied and the review and/or lifting/amending of that attachment by the attaching court a great deal of harm can be done. That is why it seems only advisable that this measure be dealt with carefully.

Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and

Subscribe to our newsletter