Summer agreement: What will change for corporation tax?

You will no doubt have discovered from one of the many news stories that the federal government reached an agreement on 26 July 2017 on the corporation tax overhaul and its decreased rates. Other measures resulting from this ‘summer agreement’ are the tax on securities accounts, the expansion of flexible jobs, the option to make the rental of property subject to VAT and the reform of the tax on savings, with the emphasis on encouraging investments in shares. The overhaul shall take place in two stages, with the first series of measures to take effect next year and the second phase scheduled for 2020. 

At present it remains a political agreement, and the actual impact and timing of the various fiscal measures shall only become clear once the technical details have been hammered out and translated into legislation. Below we sketch out an overview of the major changes to the tax rules, based on information publicly available at present. 

Corporation tax measures 
The measure that received the most media publicity is, of course, the reduction of the corporate tax rate from 34% to 25% (and 20% for SMEs for the first €100,000 bracket). The reduction is set to be performed in two phases, with a cut to 29% in 2018. Meanwhile the ‘crisis contribution’ of 3% will also be abolished over two phases.    

In the future more companies will most likely also be able to benefit from the SME rate, with the scope of which companies are defined as an SME set to be expanded in this context. It will not just be the companies that fulfil the traditional criteria set out in article 215.3 of the Income Tax Code 1992, but also those ‘small companies’ within the meaning of company law (article 15.1-15.6 of the Companies Code) that will be eligible for the SME rate. That’s certainly good news.

Moreover, a company will henceforth be obliged to pay out at least €45,000 per year to a manager, with failure to do so leading to the payment of a special assessment of 10% of that sum (or of the difference between €45,000 and the effective lower remuneration). The €45,000 sum will also be the new minimum remuneration under article 215.3.4 of the Income Tax Code 1992 (replacing the previous €36,000 sum). This means that noncompliance with this rule will not only result in a special assessment but also in the loss of the SME status. The sum only has to be paid to one manager. Startups are still indemnified from this measure (i.e. for the first four years after being incorporated). 

Introduction of the minimum tax rate
Quid pro quo, of course, and it seems as if a minimum tax rate of 7.5% is set to be introduced. How will it work in practice? Firstly, the deduction of previous losses is to be (considerably) limited. That’s because the previous losses are, together with the notional interest deduction, the DTI-deduction that is carried over and the deduction for income from innovations that is carried over, placed together in a basket that limits the maximum sum that can be deducted. That ‘basket’ amounts to €1 million plus 70% of the sum of the deductible items that exceed a million euros. That means that 30% of the deductible sum cannot be effectively deducted (but can still be carried over to the next and following years), and the upshot is that this 30% then forms a minimum taxable base – the company is taxed on it, even though no actual taxable base remains because the previous losses (or other deductible elements) are greater than the profit. This explains that ‘minimum tax rate’ of 7.5% (25% - the minimum tax rate as of 2020 – of 30% is 7.5%, not accounting for the €1 million base for which the full deduction can still be applied). 

Limited notional deduction
The notional deduction is to be limited to the growth of the risk capital over the previous five years (on the basis of a weighted average), while the transfer measure remains in effect unchanged and the investment reserve is to be abolished (with existing reserves being slowly phased out). Another notable measure is that the costs pertaining to activities or income for future years are only deductible in that year. In other words, the matching principle is extended here in a fiscal sense. This means that it will no longer be possible to deduct rent paid in advance in the year it is paid in one shot. 

Capital reductions
Capital reductions will in future be charged on a pro rata basis to the paid-up capital and the taxed reserves (that are incorporated in the capital). The option of charging the reduction preferentially and exclusively to the paid-up capital (Com. IB 92, no. 18/30) will no longer apply. Reserves included in the capital are (logically) not targeted thanks to the holding measure under article 537 of the Income Tax Code 1992. The fiscal benefits for companies employing jobseekers (double exemption for the growth of taxable profits) will be abolished. 

Capital gains taxation on shares
The capital gains taxation on shares under the corporation tax is once again set to be amended. To date large companies were required to pay a minimum of 0.412% tax on capital gains on shares that were held for more than a year, but this will now be scrapped. As of 2018 capital gains on shares will be subjected to a rate of 25% under the corporation tax. Meanwhile, the exemption for capital gains on shares will be curtailed by subjecting them to the condition of participation that holds for the DTI-deduction – aside from the other conditions for that DTI-deduction. This means that a threshold participation of at least 10% or an acquisition cost of €2.5 million is expected, with ownership retained for more than a year. So capital gains on a share participation of less than 10% (and with an acquisition cost of less than €2.5 million) is in principle still subjected to a 25% taxation rate. 

There will also be changes in respect of the reinvestment of capital gains. If the rate is set to be reduced, it could have been an attractive proposition to have the capital gains either exempted or taxed with them spread out (article 47 of the Income Tax Code 1992), even when you were aware that you do not comply with the conditions because you are not planning to reinvest that sum. So when the capital gains are later taxed after the expiry of the reinvestment period, you would still gain from the corporation tax rate that had been lowered in the interim. Bad news for those who saw this as a fresh option for optimisation as, for this very reason, the rate applicable at the time the capital gains were realised shall be applied. The overhaul does not only entail the abolishing of deductible items, it also covers new incentives. The investment deduction is to be temporarily increased from 8% to 20%, although this is only for SMEs and self-employed persons, while the exemption from paying withholding tax for academic research will be ‘extended in phases’ (for example, for bachelor degrees where it previously only applied to master’s degrees).

Package of measures that will take effect in 2020 
A second and major package of measures will take effect in 2020. A measure shall be in effect for two years that enables the conversion of tax-free reserves into taxed reserves at a rate of 15% or 10%. The (possibly net) interest expenses will only be tax deductible to a limited extent – amounting to 30% of the EBITDA. For loans dating from before 17 June 2016, a grandfathering clause will provide an exemption. The option to depreciate assets through degressive depreciations is to be scrapped, after which SMEs shall only be able to depreciate assets in the year in which they are acquired on a pro rata temporis basis. There will be stricter restrictions on deductions for car-related expenses.  

There will also be an ‘economic interpretation’ for countering the concept of permanent establishments for shifting international profits (a diverted profits tax). Belgium shall also introduce CFC legislation, in accordance with the EU Directive of 12 July 2016, under which the income of a ‘controlled foreign company’ can still be taxed in Belgium. As of 2020 a fiscal consolidation system will also be introduced in Belgium, a country that to date has been one of the few where this was not possible. The losses and profits of various group companies will then be able to be set off against each other. This will only be applicable for profits and losses after that time (i.e. there can be no setting off of profits from one company through the losses carried over from another group company dating from prior to 2020). We are curious as to how this will be worked out legislatively. Finally, the deductibility of both the assessment on secret commissions and VAT penalties will be abolished and the benefits for additional staff will likewise be scrapped/

Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and

Subscribe to our newsletter