A new minimum remuneration requirement

The Summer Agreement, partially translated into the Corporation Tax Reform Act of 25 December 2017 (published in the Belgian Official Gazette of 29 December 2017) introduces a reduced corporation tax rate that falls to 25% by tax year 2021. Under certain conditions, a small company can even benefit from a reduced rate of 20% on its first tranche of € 100,000 of taxable revenue. However, the reduction in the corporation tax rate also involves a number of compensatory measures, including a tax penalty for companies that do not meet a new minimum remuneration requirement. Below, we take a look at the requirement of the minimum remuneration that companies are now obliged to pay out.

In order to discourage the setting up of companies for purely tax reasons and to prevent companies that generate sufficient profit from compensating the natural persons active within the company solely through dividends, art. 219d of the Income Tax Act ("WIB") imposes minimum management remuneration provisions. The minimum remuneration is € 45,000 or if the taxable result is less, compensation that is at least equal to the taxable result of the company. This minimum remuneration must be awarded to at least one of its business managers (being natural persons).

For affiliated companies of which at least half of the business managers are the same persons in each of these companies, the aggregate of the remuneration paid by these companies to one of the same persons may be taken into account in order to determine the amount of the remuneration. In that case, the total amount of the minimum remuneration is raised to € 75,000.

The sanction for non-compliance is a separate assessment of 5% (tax years 2019 and 2020) or 10% (from tax year 2021) on the difference between the minimum remuneration and the highest remuneration awarded by the company to one of its business managers.

In favour of or to the detriment of the taxpayer?

The question can be asked whether the new rules are ultimately in favour of or to the detriment of the taxpayer. The answer to that question will depend on the concrete set of facts and whether the remuneration of the business manager is increased or not to avoid the penalty for the shortage of minimum remuneration. In order to answer this question correctly, account must be taken of, inter alia:

  • the level of the current remuneration (and the rate scale in which it is taxed),
  • the social security contributions,
  • the municipal tax,
  • whether the company is subject to the reduced, rising rate,
  • whether or not the business manager receives only professional income,
  • whether the business manager is married or not (applying the marriage quotient),
  • etc.

In short, a whole series of factors that can each take effect.

To the extent that the profits of the company exceed € 45,000 and the existing remuneration (lower than € 45,000) is not increased to avoid the sanction, it is certain that the total bill will often be more disadvantageous for the tax years 2019 and 2020. From tax year 2021 onwards, the scheme may become more advantageous mainly due to the further fall in the rate of corporation tax.

To the extent that the remuneration is raised to the minimum of € 45,000 or already amounts to at least € 45,000, different hypotheses show that the new scheme is often generally more profitable overall. The decrease in the corporation tax due generally compensates for the additional costs resulting from the increase of the remuneration. The company can therefore indeed compensate the tax disadvantage for the tax years 2019 and 2020 by increasing the remuneration of the business manager to the required statutory minimum.

We would also like to point out that this separate assessment will not be applicable for small companies during the first four financial years from the moment they are set up if the business manager is not remunerated sufficiently.

This is a measure that goes beyond merely providing a condition for enjoying the reduced rate for small companies. As mentioned above, this sanction applies to all companies (both small and others) that do not or do not adequately compensate their business managers.

 

Legally most correct solution
Successive usufruct: The Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel) confirms the method of levying the registration duties
On 10 December 2018, a remarkable position was published on the Vlabel website (Position no 18083 of 26 November 2018). The real estate tax system is becoming more and more sophisticated with more (tax) advantages. The question must therefore be asked whether the well-known "simple" usufruct will not be partially replaced by transactions with a double or successive usufruct. In the area of registr
From 1 January 2019
New Flemish Lease Decree
On 24 October 2018, the Flemish Parliament approved the new Flemish Lease Decree. In our newsletter of 26 October 2017, we already hinted at the changes that this new decree will bring about. One of the most important changes remains the decree's broad scope. On the one hand, extensive regulations are provided for the rental of a house intended as a main residence. What is new here is that the ter
Confirmed in writing to our office
Confirmed: both usufructuary and bare owner are to be included in the UBO register
The Belgian Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) register went live on 31 October 2018. On the basis of the legal texts and the explanatory notes, as ultimate beneficiary/ies of companies, the natural person(s) who directly or indirectly hold(s) a sufficient percentage of the voting rights or of the ownership interest in this company must first be notified. A holding of at least 25% is an indication of
The advantage is a taxable benefit
Fiches and withholding tax on benefits granted by foreign companies
Should payments received from a foreign company be subject to withholding tax and should this be declared on a fiche? At the moment, the answer to this question is negative in most situations, but this is set to change. A new draft law dated 18 December 2018 provides for the introduction of a tax fiction that requires the (Belgian) employer of the beneficiary employee not only to withhold withh
The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg
More specific: matrimonial property law
A new compensation obligation in the legal system
What if a spouse practices his profession in a company whose shares all form part of his separate property? The Act of 22 July 2018 has introduced considerable changes to matrimonial property law. This article addresses a specific addition to that law, namely the possible disadvantage incurred by the matrimonial property when a spouse practices their profession through their own company1. 
Changes in the cary proxy and usufruct
Estate planning: recent developments
Over the last few months, we have regularly reported on the important changes in estate planning and inheritance planning. Below is an update of some of those changes.   The care proxy: secure your estate for later The classic example is a person who, due to a physical or mental limitation (e.g. coma, dementia), is – temporarily or permanently – unable to manage their assets properly.
Happy Brexmas?
How to prepare your company for Brexit?
On 10 December 2018, the British Prime Minister decided to postpone the vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons. The risk of a ‘no deal’ disaster scenario is increasing. What are the important dates? On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom formally informed the European Council of its intention to leave the EU (according to the procedure provided in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty). C
A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if

Subscribe to our newsletter