A new minimum remuneration requirement

The Summer Agreement, partially translated into the Corporation Tax Reform Act of 25 December 2017 (published in the Belgian Official Gazette of 29 December 2017) introduces a reduced corporation tax rate that falls to 25% by tax year 2021. Under certain conditions, a small company can even benefit from a reduced rate of 20% on its first tranche of € 100,000 of taxable revenue. However, the reduction in the corporation tax rate also involves a number of compensatory measures, including a tax penalty for companies that do not meet a new minimum remuneration requirement. Below, we take a look at the requirement of the minimum remuneration that companies are now obliged to pay out.

In order to discourage the setting up of companies for purely tax reasons and to prevent companies that generate sufficient profit from compensating the natural persons active within the company solely through dividends, art. 219d of the Income Tax Act ("WIB") imposes minimum management remuneration provisions. The minimum remuneration is € 45,000 or if the taxable result is less, compensation that is at least equal to the taxable result of the company. This minimum remuneration must be awarded to at least one of its business managers (being natural persons).

For affiliated companies of which at least half of the business managers are the same persons in each of these companies, the aggregate of the remuneration paid by these companies to one of the same persons may be taken into account in order to determine the amount of the remuneration. In that case, the total amount of the minimum remuneration is raised to € 75,000.

The sanction for non-compliance is a separate assessment of 5% (tax years 2019 and 2020) or 10% (from tax year 2021) on the difference between the minimum remuneration and the highest remuneration awarded by the company to one of its business managers.

In favour of or to the detriment of the taxpayer?

The question can be asked whether the new rules are ultimately in favour of or to the detriment of the taxpayer. The answer to that question will depend on the concrete set of facts and whether the remuneration of the business manager is increased or not to avoid the penalty for the shortage of minimum remuneration. In order to answer this question correctly, account must be taken of, inter alia:

  • the level of the current remuneration (and the rate scale in which it is taxed),
  • the social security contributions,
  • the municipal tax,
  • whether the company is subject to the reduced, rising rate,
  • whether or not the business manager receives only professional income,
  • whether the business manager is married or not (applying the marriage quotient),
  • etc.

In short, a whole series of factors that can each take effect.

To the extent that the profits of the company exceed € 45,000 and the existing remuneration (lower than € 45,000) is not increased to avoid the sanction, it is certain that the total bill will often be more disadvantageous for the tax years 2019 and 2020. From tax year 2021 onwards, the scheme may become more advantageous mainly due to the further fall in the rate of corporation tax.

To the extent that the remuneration is raised to the minimum of € 45,000 or already amounts to at least € 45,000, different hypotheses show that the new scheme is often generally more profitable overall. The decrease in the corporation tax due generally compensates for the additional costs resulting from the increase of the remuneration. The company can therefore indeed compensate the tax disadvantage for the tax years 2019 and 2020 by increasing the remuneration of the business manager to the required statutory minimum.

We would also like to point out that this separate assessment will not be applicable for small companies during the first four financial years from the moment they are set up if the business manager is not remunerated sufficiently.

This is a measure that goes beyond merely providing a condition for enjoying the reduced rate for small companies. As mentioned above, this sanction applies to all companies (both small and others) that do not or do not adequately compensate their business managers.

 

Does the new definition of a company have any consequences for your organisation?
Broader requirements for registration with the CBE - clarification for unincorporated companies
In a previous article, we explained that the introduction of a definition of 'company' in the new Companies and Associations Code (CAC) also affects the registration with the CBE (Crossroads Bank for Enterprises). In this article, we will discuss in more detail the registration obligation for unincorporated companies.  Consequences of the broader definition of a company  With the new
Noticeable impact on tax matters
Impact of Brexit on registration and inheritance tax
The tension in the United Kingdom is palpable. In the meantime, the initial date of Brexit, 29 March 2019, has been delayed. Depending on whether an agreement will be reached or not on 29 March, UK's departure date will be moved to 12 April 2019 in case of a hard Brexit (no deal) and to 22 May 2019 in case of a soft Brexit (deal). It is clear that Brexit will have an impact on tax matters, bo
An easing-up for most SMEs
New interest deduction restriction mostly offers opportunities
As part of the reforms to corporation tax in late 2017, a new interest deduction restriction was also introduced. This is part of the second phase of the reform, meaning that it applies in principle to financial years starting on or after 1 January 2019 (assessment year 2020). The new interest deduction restriction was introduced in the transposition of the European Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (A
Some important dates highlighted
The new Companies and Associations Code
The new company and association law had already been announced for some time, and it was approved by the Chamber on 28 February 2019. Below we give a brief explanation of some of the important dates associated with the entry into force of this new legislation.   Introduction of the new legislation  The law introducing the Companies' Code enters into force on 1 May 2019 and repea
The new rules for VAT processing of vouchers
The wonderful world of VAT and vouchers
Vouchers are a very popular marketing tool. There are various types of vouchers: discount vouchers issued by a manufacturer, redeemable at any sales outlet in Belgium, discount coupons issued free of charge by retailers, vouchers where you can get a newly launched article free of charge, gift vouchers that can be redeemed for a whole range of products or services, electronic vouchers, etc. Are yo
A showpiece, or rather a sticking plaster for a broken arm?
The Belgian fiscal consolidation regime
The general intention with the introduction of a fiscal consolidation regime was clear, namely to put the Belgian tax system back in a positive light. After all, many of our neighbouring countries have had a system of fiscal consolidation in place for many years, and Belgium consequently scored badly on this point when international groups were looking to choose an investment location. The ques
The long-term lease revival
Superficies as stealth usufruct?
A noteworthy judgement was recently handed down by the Court of Appeal of Brussels regarding the taxation of overly cheap accession in the case of superficies (23 January 2019). In the past, a number of rulings had already been made on this subject (see, inter alia, Court in Ghent of 31 October 2017). The tax authorities are clearly keen to see the end of the right of superficies, and the two judg
'Paulian claim' to the rescue
Thwarting the taxman by rejecting an inheritance: is it possible?
In inheritance law, multiple heirs can have a statutory inheritance claim. As such, they are entitled to a minimum share of the inheritance. Since the new inheritance law, it is possible to freely dispose of half of one's assets. This is called the available part. If the available part is exceeded by donations, the statutory heirs may request the reduction. Through the reduction, the statutory hei
Appointing a Belgian fiscal representative is necessary
BREXIT: Important VAT news for UK companies with a Belgian VAT number
The Belgian VAT authorities confirmed that UK companies with a direct Belgian VAT registration need to appoint a Belgian fiscal representative for VAT purposes before 30/03/2019. This is in case of a no-deal Brexit on that date. The VAT administration will allow these UK companies to maintain their current Belgian VAT number, also after appointing a fiscal representative for VAT purposes. 
Legally most correct solution
Successive usufruct: The Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel) confirms the method of levying the registration duties
On 10 December 2018, a remarkable position was published on the Vlabel website (Position no 18083 of 26 November 2018). The real estate tax system is becoming more and more sophisticated with more (tax) advantages. The question must therefore be asked whether the well-known "simple" usufruct will not be partially replaced by transactions with a double or successive usufruct. In the area of registr

Subscribe to our newsletter