Split bill rule can avoid benefit in kind for smartphones

Whenever an employer provides an employee with a free tablet, mobile telephone, telephone or data subscription that may be used for private purposes, this is considered a taxable benefit in kind. Since the beginning of this year there are fixed charges for such benefits, but in some cases it is possible for a benefit to be avoided.

Fixed benefits in kind as from 2018

A fixed amount has been established for most such benefits in kind. However, until recently, there was no fixed fee for the free provision of a tablet, mobile telephone, or telephone or data subscription. Such benefits therefore needed to be evaluated on the basis of their ‘true value’ to the recipient. This changed, thanks to the Royal Decree dated 2 November 2017, establishing the following fixed annual costs, applicable as from 1 January 2018:

  • Free provision of a tablet or mobile telephone: 36 euros
  • Free telephone subscription (land line or mobile): 48 euros
  • Free internet connection (fixed or mobile): 60 euros

The latter amount of 60 euros per year shall apply, regardless of how many devices are able to utilise the internet connection. 

Changes were necessary as the existing fixed fees (particularly with regard to social security) could not always be considered to be aligned with the market, were no longer realistic and harmonisation was lacking between the various authorities (e.g. between the tax and social security authorities. The above amendment, together with a number of new (lower) fixed fees applicable as from 1 January 2018, now harmonise and clarify the existing rules. 

An important remark is that, in some cases, the amounts must be combined. Therefore, the free provision of a smartphone with a data and telephone subscription will incur a total benefit in kind of 144 euros.

Sometimes no benefit in kind at all

Naturally, if the permitted use of the tools provided by the employer is strictly professional, no benefit in kind should be incurred. Where a system exists whereby the employee pays all private use (registered in a realistic system), then it is not necessary to declare benefit in kind. In the event of such split billing, the employer will only fund the costs as long as these do not exceed a clear limit. Any amount above the limit is then charged directly to the person receiving the benefit.

The latter point has recently been confirmed in a response from the Minister of Finance to a question raised in parliament. Furthermore, the minister not only confirmed that, in such cases, there is no taxable benefit in kind on the subscription and internet connection, but also that no benefit should be charged for the device supplied. This has also been confirmed in the past by the ruling committee – before the creation of fixed fees. It is argued that, in the aforementioned case, as the employer is no longer funding any private use of the smartphone, there should also be no taxable benefit on the device itself

This is a somewhat surprising, but clear confirmation, which is certainly to the advantage of the tax payer and therefore can only be celebrated. 

The amount beyond which any use is considered to be private (6.5 euros call costs and 1.5 gigabytes per month in the case that was submitted to the minister) does still need to be established in accordance with serious standards and criteria and, as such, must be confirmed as realistic. Indeed, in the past, the ruling committee have already determined the contrary, that a particular law could not be considered as ‘realistic’, when the facts demonstrated that in the past year the set amounts were not exceeded by the employees and therefore no charge was made for private use.

Tax & Legal Services
Moving goods to another Member State – will we see a more flexible attitude in respect of the formalities?
In the wake of the ruling in favour of VAT deductions based on a non-compliant invoice, the Court of Justice has once again ruled on a case where, in the event of the non-reporting of the VAT identification number in the Member State of destination on the transfer document, the VAT exemption in the Member State of origin cannot be refused (C.o.J. 20 October 2016, case C-24/15, Plöckl). 1. The
Tax & Legal Services
Year-end tax optimisations series – advance payments
We are once again entering the final month of the year, and for most companies that also means the last month of the financial year. This is when there is still enough time to optimise numerous issues before the financial year effectively concludes. In this series we will shed light on a number of potential techniques for tax optimisation. 1. Introduction – ratio legis of advance payments
Tax & Legal Services
Year-end tax optimisations series – Tax Shelter for audiovisual works
We are once again entering the final month of the year, and for most companies that also means the last month of the financial year. This is when there is still enough time to optimise numerous issues before the financial year effectively concludes. In this series we will shed light on a number of potential techniques for tax optimisation. 1. Introduction The film industry is booming in Belg
Tax & Legal Services
Which gift vouchers can you use to give your employee a tax-free bonus?
Many companies wish to reward their employees periodically for their hard work or on occasion of a special event. But in view of the high wage costs, the various available forms of gift vouchers are an oft-used alternative. Below we provide an overview of the various options. 1. General taxation regime for gift vouchers Gift vouchers (gift vouchers, surprise vouchers, cinema vouchers, book
Tax & Legal Services
New aspects and points for attention in respect of the social insurance regulations for self-employed persons
A number of interesting amendments have been introduced in respect of the social insurance regulations for self-employed persons which we would like to inform you of. 1. Deadline for joining To date, new self-employed persons were required to join a social insurance fund no later than on the date upon which the independent activities commenced. Since 01 July 2016, they have been required
Tax & Legal Services
Will the EU now permit VAT deductions on the basis of non-compliant purchase invoices?
In a recent ruling the Court of Justice adopted the viewpoint that the tax authorities cannot refuse the right to deduct VAT just because certain required information was not stated on an invoice. In this particular case the authorities had all the information required to check whether all material conditions for exercising this right of deduction were met. 1. Principle: no compliant invoice -
Tax & Legal Services
The 2016 budgetary measures: has the mountain given birth to a mouse?
The budgetary negotiations were a tough nut to crack, but the government finally reached consensus on the 2016 budget. The budget savings of 3.006 billion euros entails measures that are 70 percent cuts, 20 percent new revenue (read: taxes) and 10 percent ‘miscellaneous’. The anticipated reform of the corporation tax, the capital gains tax on shares and the use of savings to support SMEs an
Tax & Legal Services
The “home services bonus”: let your employer pay for your cleaner or gardener
In recent years, employers and employees alike have been seeking alternative forms of remuneration that are advantageous for both parties; ways to optimise the level of return and benefit for the employee and at the same time minimise the burden of the employer’s social security contributions. A recently-developed form of extra-legal remuneration, which has been checked with both tax and soci
Tax & Legal Services
New VAT scheme for cafeterias from 2017!
Certain exempt taxpayers running not-for-profit operations are already covered by the “cafeteria scheme”, which involves a VAT tolerance allowing the cafeteria to be included under the taxpayer’s VAT-exempt activity. But from 2017 the terms of this administrative scheme are changing. 1. Context of the issue Supplying food and beverages for consumption on the premises (i.e. operating a
Tax & Legal Services
Is a benefit in kind for a residence unreasonable? A step in the right direction.
Much has been written in recent years about calculating the benefit in kind for private use of a residence provided by a company. Especially since the benefit in kind for private use of a residence was almost doubled in 2012. 1. Flat-rate determination of the benefit in kind Since 2012, in accordance with Article 18(2)(2) of the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code (KB/WIB), the ben

Subscribe to our newsletter