VAT on your own construction work: an explanation of the amended law

On 29 November 2017 amendments were made to several points in the VAT Code. This amended law was explained by the administration on 12 February (in the Circular 2018/C/20). In this article we aim to consider the consequences of the amended law for companies constructing their own company building or carrying out their own repair/maintenance or cleaning work.

Former situation
Whenever a VAT-registered party constructed its own company building to serve its own economic activity, this was considered under article 19, §2, 1st paragraph in the VAT Code as a service to itself. This meant that a “document” (internal invoice) was required as a tax measure, recording “the normal value” of the service undertaken and on which 21% VAT was charged. The normal value equated to the price that would have been charged between two independent parties for such services. The VAT could then be recovered by the tax payer depending on the extent to which he was entitled to such. New buildings are subject to revision period of 15 years. Therefore the VAT on the normal value came under the 15-year revision period.

Example
a company has purchased materials to the value of 500,000 EURO (excl. VAT) for the construction of a new building in which to carry out its taxable activities. If such construction had been carried out by an independent contractor this would have cost 800,000 EURO. In this case it would have been necessary to generate an internal document for an internal service to the value of 800,000 EURO + 21% VAT (168,000 EURO). The VAT could be deducted by the company in the same declaration, but remained subject to the 15-year revision period.

Criticism from Europe
The European Commission criticised the compatibility of our law with European legislation. After all, European law dictates that assimilation of a service for pecuniary interest should not entitle the intended tax payer to enjoy the full tax deduction right (article 27, in the VAT directive). Our national legislation was too broad because the service assimilation applied to all tax payers, regardless of whether they qualified for a full or partial deduction or no deduction at all.

Amended law
Modifications to the law dated 29 November 2017 have aligned the Belgian VAT Code with European legislation, with an amendment to article 19, §2. From now on, once the work is complete, the tax payer shall no longer be expected to take action to assimilate the service for pecuniary interest. The tax payer shall therefore no longer obliged to create a “document” (internal invoice) at that moment, in order to establish the taxable activity, and shall no longer be required to pay VAT on such activity. The construction of a new building does, however, remain an asset and, as such, all VAT that has been deducted on the expenses incurred to construct the building (e.g. the purchase of materials) must be considered for the VAT levied on assets subject to a revision over a 15-year period. The required details must, as such, be recorded in the table of company assets in order for these to be followed up.

The fundamental difference between the old and new legislation in terms of the revision obligation is therefore the amount of VAT that is subject to revision, should the building undergo a partial or full change in usage following construction and become one that does not qualify for VAT deduction. Under the old legislation the VAT amount requiring revision when a building was constructed was indeed the entire deducted VAT amount owed on the assimilation of the service performed for pecuniary interest, calculated on the normal value. Under the new legislation the taxable VAT amount for revision on the other hand is limited to the entire deducted VAT amount owed on the expenses involved in constructing the building.

Therefore, in our example, construction of the same building, for which 500,000 EURO worth of materials were bought, only 105,000 EURO VAT will be subject to the 15 – year VAT revision period (as opposed to 168,000 EURO under the former legislation).

The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg
More specific: matrimonial property law
A new compensation obligation in the legal system
What if a spouse practices his profession in a company whose shares all form part of his separate property? The Act of 22 July 2018 has introduced considerable changes to matrimonial property law. This article addresses a specific addition to that law, namely the possible disadvantage incurred by the matrimonial property when a spouse practices their profession through their own company1. 
Changes in the cary proxy and usufruct
Estate planning: recent developments
Over the last few months, we have regularly reported on the important changes in estate planning and inheritance planning. Below is an update of some of those changes.   The care proxy: secure your estate for later The classic example is a person who, due to a physical or mental limitation (e.g. coma, dementia), is – temporarily or permanently – unable to manage their assets properly.
Happy Brexmas?
How to prepare your company for Brexit?
On 10 December 2018, the British Prime Minister decided to postpone the vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons. The risk of a ‘no deal’ disaster scenario is increasing. What are the important dates? On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom formally informed the European Council of its intention to leave the EU (according to the procedure provided in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty). C
A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if
Right to deduct VAT possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares
The Ryanair ruling
Right to deduct VAT also possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares, if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead The European Court of Justice recently confirmed that VAT on costs incurred during the purchase of shares may be deductible even if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead. As such, the Court of Justice has upheld the principle that the preparatory t
What are the options?
The deduction for investment: an illustration of the options
The deduction for investment allows companies and natural persons who earn profits or benefits to reduce their taxable profits by placing part of the acquisition or investment value of investments in new tangible and intangible fixed assets. Depending on the size of your business and the nature of your activities, you can generally apply the regular, one-off deduction for investment of 20% (tem
Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f

Subscribe to our newsletter