VAT on your own construction work: an explanation of the amended law

On 29 November 2017 amendments were made to several points in the VAT Code. This amended law was explained by the administration on 12 February (in the Circular 2018/C/20). In this article we aim to consider the consequences of the amended law for companies constructing their own company building or carrying out their own repair/maintenance or cleaning work.

Former situation
Whenever a VAT-registered party constructed its own company building to serve its own economic activity, this was considered under article 19, §2, 1st paragraph in the VAT Code as a service to itself. This meant that a “document” (internal invoice) was required as a tax measure, recording “the normal value” of the service undertaken and on which 21% VAT was charged. The normal value equated to the price that would have been charged between two independent parties for such services. The VAT could then be recovered by the tax payer depending on the extent to which he was entitled to such. New buildings are subject to revision period of 15 years. Therefore the VAT on the normal value came under the 15-year revision period.

Example
a company has purchased materials to the value of 500,000 EURO (excl. VAT) for the construction of a new building in which to carry out its taxable activities. If such construction had been carried out by an independent contractor this would have cost 800,000 EURO. In this case it would have been necessary to generate an internal document for an internal service to the value of 800,000 EURO + 21% VAT (168,000 EURO). The VAT could be deducted by the company in the same declaration, but remained subject to the 15-year revision period.

Criticism from Europe
The European Commission criticised the compatibility of our law with European legislation. After all, European law dictates that assimilation of a service for pecuniary interest should not entitle the intended tax payer to enjoy the full tax deduction right (article 27, in the VAT directive). Our national legislation was too broad because the service assimilation applied to all tax payers, regardless of whether they qualified for a full or partial deduction or no deduction at all.

Amended law
Modifications to the law dated 29 November 2017 have aligned the Belgian VAT Code with European legislation, with an amendment to article 19, §2. From now on, once the work is complete, the tax payer shall no longer be expected to take action to assimilate the service for pecuniary interest. The tax payer shall therefore no longer obliged to create a “document” (internal invoice) at that moment, in order to establish the taxable activity, and shall no longer be required to pay VAT on such activity. The construction of a new building does, however, remain an asset and, as such, all VAT that has been deducted on the expenses incurred to construct the building (e.g. the purchase of materials) must be considered for the VAT levied on assets subject to a revision over a 15-year period. The required details must, as such, be recorded in the table of company assets in order for these to be followed up.

The fundamental difference between the old and new legislation in terms of the revision obligation is therefore the amount of VAT that is subject to revision, should the building undergo a partial or full change in usage following construction and become one that does not qualify for VAT deduction. Under the old legislation the VAT amount requiring revision when a building was constructed was indeed the entire deducted VAT amount owed on the assimilation of the service performed for pecuniary interest, calculated on the normal value. Under the new legislation the taxable VAT amount for revision on the other hand is limited to the entire deducted VAT amount owed on the expenses involved in constructing the building.

Therefore, in our example, construction of the same building, for which 500,000 EURO worth of materials were bought, only 105,000 EURO VAT will be subject to the 15 – year VAT revision period (as opposed to 168,000 EURO under the former legislation).

Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and

Subscribe to our newsletter