Freight transport and closely associated services: new rules clarified in a circular

On 31 October 2017, (previous) Royal Decree No 57, which deals with the freight transport services Department and related services, was replaced by a new RD which came into force on 23 November 2017. It clarifies the former RD in part while introducing a new rule. In order to clarify and discuss the (new) rules, the tax authorities published an administrative circular in this regard on 31 May 2018.

General VAT rule regarding place of supply of services
VAT on a freight transport service for a recipient who is subject to VAT is considered to be applied in the country where the recipient is established. This is by application of the General rule regarding place of supply of services (Article 21, §2 VAT Law). The physical place of the actual freight transport is, in principle, irrelevant. For example, if a Belgian company were to instruct another Belgian company to transport goods from Amsterdam to Cologne, Belgian VAT will apply. For VAT purposes, the location of the freight transport service is indeed where the recipient is located, i.e. in Belgium. The place of the actual freight transport is, in principle, not important.

The King has the power to derogate from this general rule regarding place of supply of services on the basis of the actual use of the service and has used it in the implementing RD No 57. These rules regarding place of supply based on the actual use of a service are referred to as “use and enjoyment” rules.

“Use and enjoyment” rules
It is important that these “use and enjoyment” rules only apply in a B2B context. In other words, these rules only apply to services supplied to recipients who are subject to VAT, particularly VAT taxable persons with the right to full deduction, but also hybrid or partially taxable persons or non-taxable legal persons with a VAT number. Freight transport on behalf of an authority with a VAT number will therefore be covered under the special rules.

Based on the “use and enjoyment” rules, the place of freight transport services and related services will deviate from the general rule regarding place of supply of services, in the following instances:

  • When the entire freight transport service process takes place outside the EU, the place of service will be outside the EU;
  • When the entire freight transport service process takes place within Belgium, the place of service will be in Belgium. This is a new rule that did not appear in the previous RD.

Due to several practical difficulties in applying the principle of actual use, where the place of service is normally determined in relation to the distance travelled, it is clarified (and required by law) in the new RD that the “use and enjoyment” rule only comes into effect if the entire process takes place outside the EU or outside Belgium. If the entire process does not take place outside the EU or outside Belgium, the “use and enjoyment” rule cannot be applied and the general rule regarding place of supply of services will apply.

Example: if a Belgian carrier is contracted by a Belgian client to transport goods from Liège to Bern, the service takes place in Belgium. This is by application of the General rule regarding place of supply of services. However, if the client is established in Bern, the service takes place in Switzerland and no European VAT is applicable. Should the entire transport service take place between Zurich and Bern, the service takes place outside the EU, regardless of whether it is a Belgian or Swiss client liable for VAT. The “use and enjoyment” rule is applicable in this instance and ensures that the service for VAT purposes is located where the transport actually takes place.

For services supplied to persons not subject to VAT, it was previously stated that the King has not taken any implementation measures and that the “use and enjoyment” provision does not apply. Since transport other than intra-community freight transport for non-taxable persons in accordance with the usual rule regarding place of supply of services is already located in relation to the distance travelled, the actual consumption was already partly taken into account. For VAT purposes, the transport of goods from Brussels to America and their export through the port of Antwerp for a private individual, will take place partly in Belgium, partly outside Europe.

The “use and enjoyment” rules do not only apply to freight transport services, but also to related services (including loading, unloading, handling of goods and similar activities without changing the nature of the goods). The proposed services are required to be directly related to the transported goods and transport. For example, when goods are repackaged for shipment (e.g. splitting of loading units) from Tokyo to Shanghai, the place of service will be located outside the EU, regardless of where the client is established. The “use and enjoyment” rule applies.

Services other than those related to transport are excluded from the “use and enjoyment” rule. For example, the storage of goods does not fall within the category of these services. If a Belgian citizen stores goods in America for another Belgian person subject to VAT, Belgian VAT will have to be charged (assuming that they represent active logistic services).

Please note that if the place of service takes place in Belgium according to the “use and enjoyment” rule, one must remember to check whether it is possible to apply a VAT exemption on the basis of Art. 41, §1 VAT Law. On the basis of this article, some services such as those directly related to the export of goods or the import of goods (if their value is included in the taxable amount in respect of the importation of the goods) are exempt from VAT.

Example: a Belgian carrier is contracted to transport goods for an American company from Brussels to Antwerp from where they are to be shipped to Asia.  According to the “use and enjoyment” rule, the transport service supplied by the Belgian carrier takes place in Belgium. However, since the goods are transported for export, a VAT exemption can be applied so that no VAT needs to be charged in practice on Belgian transport.

The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg
More specific: matrimonial property law
A new compensation obligation in the legal system
What if a spouse practices his profession in a company whose shares all form part of his separate property? The Act of 22 July 2018 has introduced considerable changes to matrimonial property law. This article addresses a specific addition to that law, namely the possible disadvantage incurred by the matrimonial property when a spouse practices their profession through their own company1. 
Changes in the cary proxy and usufruct
Estate planning: recent developments
Over the last few months, we have regularly reported on the important changes in estate planning and inheritance planning. Below is an update of some of those changes.   The care proxy: secure your estate for later The classic example is a person who, due to a physical or mental limitation (e.g. coma, dementia), is – temporarily or permanently – unable to manage their assets properly.
Happy Brexmas?
How to prepare your company for Brexit?
On 10 December 2018, the British Prime Minister decided to postpone the vote on the Brexit deal in the House of Commons. The risk of a ‘no deal’ disaster scenario is increasing. What are the important dates? On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom formally informed the European Council of its intention to leave the EU (according to the procedure provided in Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty). C
A popular control structure
The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?
The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business.  The advant
The tax framework
Company subsidies: exempted or not?
Various subsidies were briefly described in the article by our colleagues from Strategy and Operations. They explained that they can assist you and your company with guidance on subsidies, from A to Z.1 In this context, we would like to discuss the tax framework for subsidies: how are awarded subsidies treated tax-wise within companies? Are these subsidies exempt from corporation tax and, if
Right to deduct VAT possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares
The Ryanair ruling
Right to deduct VAT also possible for costs incurred during the purchase of shares, if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead The European Court of Justice recently confirmed that VAT on costs incurred during the purchase of shares may be deductible even if the purchase ultimately does not (fully) go ahead. As such, the Court of Justice has upheld the principle that the preparatory t
What are the options?
The deduction for investment: an illustration of the options
The deduction for investment allows companies and natural persons who earn profits or benefits to reduce their taxable profits by placing part of the acquisition or investment value of investments in new tangible and intangible fixed assets. Depending on the size of your business and the nature of your activities, you can generally apply the regular, one-off deduction for investment of 20% (tem
Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f

Subscribe to our newsletter