FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)

On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction.

Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 205/1 to 205/4 Income Tax Code 1992.For a more generalised explanation of the Innovation Income Deduction, which was published when the legislation was published, we refer you to an article from February 2017.

The recent FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions with comprehensive answers which enable the fiscal administration to provide further details on how the recently introduced legal provisions must be specifically interpreted. An overview of a few questions:

  • Intellectual property rights - Should they be booked to the assets of the balance sheet on the company's annual accounts?
  • Intellectual property rights - When is a computer program considered to be protected by copyright laws?
  • Intellectual property rights - From when can the intended intellectual property rights be taken into account?
  • Net innovation income - how is the deduction of historical costs processed?
  • Innovation Income Deduction - What makes up the fiscal benefit that is linked to this innovation income? - Exemption - Temporary exemption;
  • Transition regime for the Patent Income Deduction - Is there a convergence between the Innovation Income Deduction and the Patent Income Deduction?

Many of the explanations relating to these questions contain a simplified reiteration of what can already be deduced from legal texts, the explanatory memo or existing practice in relation to the former patent deduction. Consider, for example, the fact that all marketing-related intellectual property rights are excluded from the Innovation Income Deduction, or what should now be understood by an included licence fee.

What is positive is that the fiscal authorities are providing certainty regarding specific costs that may or may not have to be deducted from gross innovation income.  We therefore learn, for example, that costs linked to the application for intellectual property rights do not qualify as expenditure for research and development. Costs that relate to the protection of a patent are also regarded as ineligible expenditure. Indeed, in light of the quite recent DEMPE concept1 which was introduced by the OECD in relation to intellectual property and also given the fact that the Belgian innovation deduction is applied to the innovative character which is substantiated (i.e. effective research and effective development) in Belgium, this would appear to be logical.

In addition, we noted that there is confirmation that bought-in intellectual property rights which relate to a deduction must be activated in section 'II. Intangible fixed assets'. The same goes for costs of research and development for self-developed intellectual property rights whereby the rules of Belgian accounting are followed. These determine, more specifically, that development costs can be activated and thus booked to section 'II. Intangible fixed assets' where the costs for research may also be included in the same section on condition that the costs in question are immediately and fully written off in the year they are activated.

Finally, there are additional explanations regarding a number of new elements that were implemented but which where not possible under the old patent deduction regime. For example, there was clarification of what we should understand by copyright protected software and when this can be considered as intellectual property rights. Further explanation was also provided with regard to newly defined concepts such as qualified intellectual property rights for process innovation, received damages due to a violation of intellectual property rights and amounts obtained for transferring intellectual property rights. 

Consequently, aside from a few extra clarifications, the FAQ offers a limited addition to the existing practices that are already applied by our office. Nevertheless, there is a clear need for a case-by-case approach to the application of the Innovation Income Deduction.

1: DEMPE stands for ‘Development, Exploitation, Maintenance, Protection and Enhancement’.

The new rules for VAT processing of vouchers
The wonderful world of VAT and vouchers
Vouchers are a very popular marketing tool. There are various types of vouchers: discount vouchers issued by a manufacturer, redeemable at any sales outlet in Belgium, discount coupons issued free of charge by retailers, vouchers where you can get a newly launched article free of charge, gift vouchers that can be redeemed for a whole range of products or services, electronic vouchers, etc. Are yo
A showpiece, or rather a sticking plaster for a broken arm?
The Belgian fiscal consolidation regime
The general intention with the introduction of a fiscal consolidation regime was clear, namely to put the Belgian tax system back in a positive light. After all, many of our neighbouring countries have had a system of fiscal consolidation in place for many years, and Belgium consequently scored badly on this point when international groups were looking to choose an investment location. The ques
The long-term lease revival
Superficies as stealth usufruct?
A noteworthy judgement was recently handed down by the Court of Appeal of Brussels regarding the taxation of overly cheap accession in the case of superficies (23 January 2019). In the past, a number of rulings had already been made on this subject (see, inter alia, Court in Ghent of 31 October 2017). The tax authorities are clearly keen to see the end of the right of superficies, and the two judg
'Paulian claim' to the rescue
Thwarting the taxman by rejecting an inheritance: is it possible?
In inheritance law, multiple heirs can have a statutory inheritance claim. As such, they are entitled to a minimum share of the inheritance. Since the new inheritance law, it is possible to freely dispose of half of one's assets. This is called the available part. If the available part is exceeded by donations, the statutory heirs may request the reduction. Through the reduction, the statutory hei
Appointing a Belgian fiscal representative is necessary
BREXIT: Important VAT news for UK companies with a Belgian VAT number
The Belgian VAT authorities confirmed that UK companies with a direct Belgian VAT registration need to appoint a Belgian fiscal representative for VAT purposes before 30/03/2019. This is in case of a no-deal Brexit on that date. The VAT administration will allow these UK companies to maintain their current Belgian VAT number, also after appointing a fiscal representative for VAT purposes. 
Legally most correct solution
Successive usufruct: The Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel) confirms the method of levying the registration duties
On 10 December 2018, a remarkable position was published on the Vlabel website (Position no 18083 of 26 November 2018). The real estate tax system is becoming more and more sophisticated with more (tax) advantages. The question must therefore be asked whether the well-known "simple" usufruct will not be partially replaced by transactions with a double or successive usufruct. In the area of registr
From 1 January 2019
New Flemish Lease Decree
On 24 October 2018, the Flemish Parliament approved the new Flemish Lease Decree. In our newsletter of 26 October 2017, we already hinted at the changes that this new decree will bring about. One of the most important changes remains the decree's broad scope. On the one hand, extensive regulations are provided for the rental of a house intended as a main residence. What is new here is that the ter
Confirmed in writing to our office
Confirmed: both usufructuary and bare owner are to be included in the UBO register
The Belgian Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) register went live on 31 October 2018. On the basis of the legal texts and the explanatory notes, as ultimate beneficiary/ies of companies, the natural person(s) who directly or indirectly hold(s) a sufficient percentage of the voting rights or of the ownership interest in this company must first be notified. A holding of at least 25% is an indication of
The advantage is a taxable benefit
Fiches and withholding tax on benefits granted by foreign companies
Should payments received from a foreign company be subject to withholding tax and should this be declared on a fiche? At the moment, the answer to this question is negative in most situations, but this is set to change. A new draft law dated 18 December 2018 provides for the introduction of a tax fiction that requires the (Belgian) employer of the beneficiary employee not only to withhold withh
The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg

Subscribe to our newsletter