FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)

On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction.

Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 205/1 to 205/4 Income Tax Code 1992.For a more generalised explanation of the Innovation Income Deduction, which was published when the legislation was published, we refer you to an article from February 2017.

The recent FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions with comprehensive answers which enable the fiscal administration to provide further details on how the recently introduced legal provisions must be specifically interpreted. An overview of a few questions:

  • Intellectual property rights - Should they be booked to the assets of the balance sheet on the company's annual accounts?
  • Intellectual property rights - When is a computer program considered to be protected by copyright laws?
  • Intellectual property rights - From when can the intended intellectual property rights be taken into account?
  • Net innovation income - how is the deduction of historical costs processed?
  • Innovation Income Deduction - What makes up the fiscal benefit that is linked to this innovation income? - Exemption - Temporary exemption;
  • Transition regime for the Patent Income Deduction - Is there a convergence between the Innovation Income Deduction and the Patent Income Deduction?

Many of the explanations relating to these questions contain a simplified reiteration of what can already be deduced from legal texts, the explanatory memo or existing practice in relation to the former patent deduction. Consider, for example, the fact that all marketing-related intellectual property rights are excluded from the Innovation Income Deduction, or what should now be understood by an included licence fee.

What is positive is that the fiscal authorities are providing certainty regarding specific costs that may or may not have to be deducted from gross innovation income.  We therefore learn, for example, that costs linked to the application for intellectual property rights do not qualify as expenditure for research and development. Costs that relate to the protection of a patent are also regarded as ineligible expenditure. Indeed, in light of the quite recent DEMPE concept1 which was introduced by the OECD in relation to intellectual property and also given the fact that the Belgian innovation deduction is applied to the innovative character which is substantiated (i.e. effective research and effective development) in Belgium, this would appear to be logical.

In addition, we noted that there is confirmation that bought-in intellectual property rights which relate to a deduction must be activated in section 'II. Intangible fixed assets'. The same goes for costs of research and development for self-developed intellectual property rights whereby the rules of Belgian accounting are followed. These determine, more specifically, that development costs can be activated and thus booked to section 'II. Intangible fixed assets' where the costs for research may also be included in the same section on condition that the costs in question are immediately and fully written off in the year they are activated.

Finally, there are additional explanations regarding a number of new elements that were implemented but which where not possible under the old patent deduction regime. For example, there was clarification of what we should understand by copyright protected software and when this can be considered as intellectual property rights. Further explanation was also provided with regard to newly defined concepts such as qualified intellectual property rights for process innovation, received damages due to a violation of intellectual property rights and amounts obtained for transferring intellectual property rights. 

Consequently, aside from a few extra clarifications, the FAQ offers a limited addition to the existing practices that are already applied by our office. Nevertheless, there is a clear need for a case-by-case approach to the application of the Innovation Income Deduction.

1: DEMPE stands for ‘Development, Exploitation, Maintenance, Protection and Enhancement’.

A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and
The 'use and enjoyment" rules explained
Freight transport and closely associated services: new rules clarified in a circular
On 31 October 2017, (previous) Royal Decree No 57, which deals with the freight transport services Department and related services, was replaced by a new RD which came into force on 23 November 2017. It clarifies the former RD in part while introducing a new rule. In order to clarify and discuss the (new) rules, the tax authorities published an administrative circular in this regard on 31 May 2018
Guidelines
Substantial changes in the obligations for partnerships
The Company Law Reform, published on 27 April 2018, is making a number of changes in the Companies Code and the Code of Economic Law. These new regulations will enter into force on 1 November 2018. A few rules will also change for partnerships. Although some clarifications will still be published, we would already like to provide the following guidelines. Changes in the Companies Code A first
Quickly detect system risks
Without a Legal Entity Identifier your company will not be trading on the stock market in 2018
  As from 3 January 2018, every legal entity that buys or sells financial instruments must have a Legal Entity Identifier or LEI. Legal Entity Identifier A LEI is a 20-digit alpha-numeric code enabling quick identification of legal entities that are active on the (international or local) financial markets. The LEI enables regulators to quickly detect system risks. Registrati
A summary of the main points
Immovable property leases to include VAT
  Although currently there is just a draft bill on this issue, which obviously can be subject to change in the meantime, we would like to summarize the main points of the upcoming revolution in the VAT landscape: immovable property leases may become subject to VAT. History Until recently, immovable property leases have – in principle – been exempt from VAT (section 44, paragr
UBO = Ultimate Beneficial Owner
The UBO register: new disclosure requirements planned for your company’s administrative body
As a result of the insertion of sections 14(1) and 14(2) into the Belgian Companies Code all companies must in the future obtain adequate, accurate and current information about their ‘ultimate beneficial owners’ (UBOs) and record the data in the new ‘UBO Register’, a central register containing data about companies and the natural persons behind them. In view of the unwavering atte

Subscribe to our newsletter