FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)

On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction.

Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 205/1 to 205/4 Income Tax Code 1992.For a more generalised explanation of the Innovation Income Deduction, which was published when the legislation was published, we refer you to an article from February 2017.

The recent FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions with comprehensive answers which enable the fiscal administration to provide further details on how the recently introduced legal provisions must be specifically interpreted. An overview of a few questions:

  • Intellectual property rights - Should they be booked to the assets of the balance sheet on the company's annual accounts?
  • Intellectual property rights - When is a computer program considered to be protected by copyright laws?
  • Intellectual property rights - From when can the intended intellectual property rights be taken into account?
  • Net innovation income - how is the deduction of historical costs processed?
  • Innovation Income Deduction - What makes up the fiscal benefit that is linked to this innovation income? - Exemption - Temporary exemption;
  • Transition regime for the Patent Income Deduction - Is there a convergence between the Innovation Income Deduction and the Patent Income Deduction?

Many of the explanations relating to these questions contain a simplified reiteration of what can already be deduced from legal texts, the explanatory memo or existing practice in relation to the former patent deduction. Consider, for example, the fact that all marketing-related intellectual property rights are excluded from the Innovation Income Deduction, or what should now be understood by an included licence fee.

What is positive is that the fiscal authorities are providing certainty regarding specific costs that may or may not have to be deducted from gross innovation income.  We therefore learn, for example, that costs linked to the application for intellectual property rights do not qualify as expenditure for research and development. Costs that relate to the protection of a patent are also regarded as ineligible expenditure. Indeed, in light of the quite recent DEMPE concept1 which was introduced by the OECD in relation to intellectual property and also given the fact that the Belgian innovation deduction is applied to the innovative character which is substantiated (i.e. effective research and effective development) in Belgium, this would appear to be logical.

In addition, we noted that there is confirmation that bought-in intellectual property rights which relate to a deduction must be activated in section 'II. Intangible fixed assets'. The same goes for costs of research and development for self-developed intellectual property rights whereby the rules of Belgian accounting are followed. These determine, more specifically, that development costs can be activated and thus booked to section 'II. Intangible fixed assets' where the costs for research may also be included in the same section on condition that the costs in question are immediately and fully written off in the year they are activated.

Finally, there are additional explanations regarding a number of new elements that were implemented but which where not possible under the old patent deduction regime. For example, there was clarification of what we should understand by copyright protected software and when this can be considered as intellectual property rights. Further explanation was also provided with regard to newly defined concepts such as qualified intellectual property rights for process innovation, received damages due to a violation of intellectual property rights and amounts obtained for transferring intellectual property rights. 

Consequently, aside from a few extra clarifications, the FAQ offers a limited addition to the existing practices that are already applied by our office. Nevertheless, there is a clear need for a case-by-case approach to the application of the Innovation Income Deduction.

1: DEMPE stands for ‘Development, Exploitation, Maintenance, Protection and Enhancement’.

Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f
The labour market of the future
Earn (on the side) flexibly and untaxed
There are three legal social statuses in Belgium, (i) employee, (ii) self-employed and (iii) civil servant. However, the question is often asked whether these classifications are still relevant to the rapidly evolving labour market in which flexibility is key and many people opt for a 'freelance status' or wish to combine several statuses. Voka has already called for a debate on the labour mark
Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th

Subscribe to our newsletter