Joint parenting for tax purposes: children of age also count

At the start of this year the authorities published a circular explaining the amendment to the article allowing joint parenting for tax purposes to now also be applied to children of age.

1. A brief history

Until the Law of 3 August 2016, the joint parenting arrangement for tax purposes (fiscaal co-ouderschap) was limited to children who were still under parental authority. This meant that only the joint, non-emancipated underage children of both parents were eligible for joint parenting for tax purposes. Once a child is of age (or emancipated before that time) joint parenting for tax purposes could no longer be applied.

2. Legislative amendment and circular


A child who is of age, however, can actually be a greater financial burden on his or her parents: just imagine the costs of further studies or moving into lodgings, clothing and anything else. The authorities rightly found the situation unjustifiable and have amended the terminology of article 132bis of the Income Tax Code, the article governing joint parenting for tax purposes, through the Law of 3 August 2016. As of that time ‘jointly exercising parental authority over a child’ was scrapped and was replaced with ‘obligation to support a child’, as a result of which emancipated children or children of age are now also eligible.

In its circular dated 20 January 2017 the authorities discussed the time for which that obligation to support a child – as set out in article 203 of the Civil Code – runs. On the basis of this the joint parenting for tax purposes can be applied for emancipated minors as well as for children of age, for as long as the child’s education has not been completed by 1 January of the tax year and the other conditions for joint parenting for tax purposes are met. This amendment is applicable as of the 2017 tax year.

3. Real-world considerations: joint parenting for tax purposes versus deducting maintenance


The amendment is a positive move in every sense and has removed one of the sore points of joint parenting for tax purposes. When parents choose joint parenting for tax purposes, one must however not forget that maintenance cannot be deducted by the parent of whom the children are not dependants.

We have already noted that costs for supporting a child of age can be higher, which means it is possible that deducting maintenance is more appealing from a tax perspective than applying the joint parenting for tax purposes arrangement. Under joint parenting for tax purposes the tax-free sum is divided among both parents, but it only has an impact upon the lowest personal income tax rates. On the other hand, the deduction of maintenance (80% of the regularly paid maintenance) is a deductible expense that impacts the highest tax brackets.

Before opting en masse for deducting maintenance for children of age, we wish to express the following reservations. The flipside of the 80% deductibility of the maintenance is that 80% of the maintenance is also taxable for the recipient (the child) and it can affect whether the child of age is considered a dependant of the parent with whom he or she resides. One must here also take into account the income generated from student jobs (exceeding the initial exempted income bracket of €2,660 for the 2017 income year), which also counts as a net means of support in determining whether or not the child is a dependant.

A prior consultation and a calculation of the tax effects for all parties concerned (both parents and children) is thus highly recommended.

Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
Limited number of legal entity types
Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!
The WVV ("CAC") is on its way On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935. This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Asso
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th
Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and

Subscribe to our newsletter