FATCA: Prevention is better than reclamation

The US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) has been in effect since 1 July 2014. The law is part of the war on tax fraud and is aimed at tackling international tax avoidance by American citizens through a new system of global automatic data exchange.

What obligations have been introduced under FATCA?
Under FATCA certain identification, reporting and/or content obligations are imposed for parties based both in the US and abroad. In this way, the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) hopes to eliminate those structures where American citizens seek refuge in foreign financial accounts where they can conceal income from the IRS. The act has a very wide scope and concerns both financial and non-financial entities/persons. Moreover, the fact that a country has signed a double taxation agreement with the US does not release the residents of that country from their obligations under FATCA. These obligations are not only due to the applicable FATCA legislation, but also to the domestic regulations specifically drawn up for each country. Belgium, for example, signed an intergovernmental agreement with the US on 23 April 2014 that means the FPS Finance undertakes to provide all information targeted by FATCA to the IRS.

How can this impact Belgian residents?
In practice it means that Belgian residents – whether private persons or legal entities – can be forced to deal with FATCA in a number of ways:

If the Belgian resident is a direct beneficiary of payments originating in the US:
In this case, a Belgian beneficiary of payments from the US shall have to identify themselves (mostly at the request of their customer/contracted party) to their American counterparty in order to avoid a 30% withholding tax upon payment of the sums concerned.

Because of the wide scope, almost all non-American persons or companies that receive some form of income from the US, whether directly or indirectly, are subject to the withholding of this source tax. The target income includes interest payments, dividends, rents, salaries, remunerations, premium, annuities, reimbursements, rewards, fees or any other fixed or determinable annual or periodic profits, revenue or income. Also targeted are the gross revenues from the sale of or any other transfer of all property that can result in dividends or interest. What this means is that the American debtor is required to withhold 30% tax at source, unless it is able to obtain the required documentation from the non-American beneficiary so that it can be ascertained in what manner this foreign beneficiary qualifies under FATCA.

By having an account with a non-American financial institution:
Here the targeted financial institutions (banks, insurance companies, collective investment bodies, etc) are required to impose upon their clients that have one of the ‘US indicia’ a series of obligations, including the obligation to identify themselves and the obligation to provide specific information concerning the financial accounts (which is a broader category than bank accounts alone) that these clients have with the institution.

‘US indicia’ include:

For natural persons:

  • US citizenship or permanent US resident or a Green Card;
  • US birthplace;
  • At least one address in the US;
  • A telephone number in the US;
  • Instructions to pay amounts from a foreign financial account to a US account;
  • A power of attorney for a financial account for a person with an address in the US. 

For legal entities:

  • If based or headquartered in the US;
  • With an address in the US (place of business, postal address).

Foreign financial institutions that do not participate in FATCA or that do not properly comply with the FATCA obligations are subjected to ‘financial’ sanctions in the form of 30% withholding tax on the gross of those payments of American origin to the financial institutions in question (irrespective of whether these payments are on their own account or are received on account of their clients).

How can one avoid the withholding tax?
In order to comply with the FATCA obligations and thus avoid the 30% withholding tax, one must complete the various forms made available by the IRS for that purpose. If a Belgian beneficiary of US income or a client with a financial account with a non-American financial institution is concerned, then the W-9 (for US citizens), W-8BEN-E (for non-US entities) and W-8BEN (for non-US citizens) forms are the most common ones. For completing these forms, it can in some cases also be advisable to apply for a US tax number. When applying for such a tax number the foreign citizen or entity does not automatically become a taxpayer in the US – in fact, such a number could even be necessary in order to be able to claim certain exemptions under the double taxation agreement.

By completing these forms a person or entity qualifies under FATCA. Properly completing them, and hence the proper qualification of a foreign person or legal entity, is consequentially essential for avoiding the 30% withholding tax. In principle, the ‘payer’ of income or money of US origin or, where applicable, the non-American financial institution is responsible for the proper application of FATCA and the withholding.

That ‘payer’ or the non-American financial institution can thus also be held liable in the event of improper non-withholding. That means it cannot be ruled out that that party will, even for the smallest uncertainty or irregularity, err on the side of caution when it comes to the FATCA formalities and opt to deduct that withholding tax. If the withholding tax is deducted improperly one can, under certain circumstances, claim it back from the IRS. It must however be noted that such a procedure can take an extraordinarily long time as well as involving the necessary expenses, so we strongly recommend that the necessary FATCA formalities be completed in advance, thus avoiding a long and costly procedure at a later date in attempting to reclaim that 30% withholding tax.

In the global society of today, where financial transactions with American persons or entities can no longer be thought away, it is all the more important to prepare for the impact that FATCA can have in a financial sense, both for professional actors as well as ordinary individuals. As already stated, the scope of the act is extraordinarily wide, to the extent that sooner or later everybody could be affected by FATCA. Completing the forms properly and in good time is crucial when it comes to avoiding that – for safety’s sake but unjustly – 30% withholding tax is deducted.

The consequences for companies
VAT on your own construction work: an explanation of the amended law
On 29 November 2017 amendments were made to several points in the VAT Code. This amended law was explained by the administration on 12 February (in the Circular 2018/C/20). In this article we aim to consider the consequences of the amended law for companies constructing their own company building or carrying out their own repair/maintenance or cleaning work. Former situation Whenever a VAT-reg
Setting up a plegde on moveable assets will be easier
The new Pledge Act: introduction of a non-possessory pledge and extension of the retention of title
The new property law came into force as from 1 January 2018 (the act of 25 December 2016 establishing the amendment of various provisions with regard to the collateral on moveable assets, Belgian Official Journal 30 December 2016). This makes it easier to set up a pledge on moveable assets thanks to the introduction of a Pledge Register and it extends the effect of retention of title. Non-posse
New fixed benefits in kind as from 2018
Split bill rule can avoid benefit in kind for smartphones
Whenever an employer provides an employee with a free tablet, mobile telephone, telephone or data subscription that may be used for private purposes, this is considered a taxable benefit in kind. Since the beginning of this year there are fixed charges for such benefits, but in some cases it is possible for a benefit to be avoided. Fixed benefits in kind as from 2018 A fixed amount has been
An interesting way to obtain capital more advantageously?
The Belgian tax treatment of the surrender of Dutch pensions under self-administration
Just before the end of the year, the tax administration finally made the decision and published a circular (Circular 2017/C/87 dated 22 December 2017), which addresses the Belgian treatment of the phasing out of the Dutch “pension under self-administration”.  Phasing out Dutch pensions under self-administration  Until 1 April 2017, a Dutch director-major shareholder or “DGA”
Who is now obligated to use this cash register?
The long-expected circular on the 'white cash register' has been published
Many words have been written over the past few years about the registered cash register system (the 'white cash register'). In exchange for a rate reduction for restaurant and catering services to 12% (instead of 21% - except for drinks), there was a requirement for hospitality businesses to work with a registered cash register system in order to combat fraud in the sector. The question over the p
The new tax rules
New car tax legislation: wheels in motion
Traditionally in Belgium, January is all about cars. Each year, the Autosalon (Motor Show) attracts hundreds of thousands of car fans to the Heysel. This year, the spotlight will not just be on the latest models of cars – the new car tax legislation will also be grabbing all the attention. So, once more, it’s time to set out the most important changes – in both corporation and personal incom
A simple and flexible way for companies to give a bonus to their employees
The profit premium from 1 January 2018
The new profit premium gives companies the opportunity to allocate part of their profits as a bonus to their employees in a simple and flexible way. The employees receive a premium, which amounts to either a fixed sum or a percentage of their wages without the employee being allocated a voting right in the company. Definition of profit premium and conditions The profit premium is a premium pa
Reduced corporation tax: in favour of or to the detriment of the taxpayer?
A new minimum remuneration requirement
The Summer Agreement, partially translated into the Corporation Tax Reform Act of 25 December 2017 (published in the Belgian Official Gazette of 29 December 2017) introduces a reduced corporation tax rate that falls to 25% by tax year 2021. Under certain conditions, a small company can even benefit from a reduced rate of 20% on its first tranche of € 100,000 of taxable revenue. However, the
A number of regulated professions are being abolished
Abolition of professional competence in Flanders: the consequences at a glance
In accordance with the Establishment of Businesses Act, every SME, natural person or legal entity wishing to engage in a commercial activity must prove the necessary entrepreneurial skills. For most professions, a basic knowledge of business management is sufficient but for a number of others, specific professional competence is required. This is in contradiction with European legislation that sta
The 4 action points thoroughly discussed
How the Summer Agreement affects the ATAD Directive
By now it’s hardly news that Belgian corporation tax will be comprehensively reformed as part of the Summer Agreement. The proposed reforms as set out in the drafts of the Programme Act (authorising government expenditure measures) and the Recovery Act were approved on 27 October by the Cabinet. The government presented the Programme Act bill to the House of Representatives on 6 November 2017, w

Subscribe to our newsletter