Split bill rule can avoid benefit in kind for smartphones

Whenever an employer provides an employee with a free tablet, mobile telephone, telephone or data subscription that may be used for private purposes, this is considered a taxable benefit in kind. Since the beginning of this year there are fixed charges for such benefits, but in some cases it is possible for a benefit to be avoided.

Fixed benefits in kind as from 2018

A fixed amount has been established for most such benefits in kind. However, until recently, there was no fixed fee for the free provision of a tablet, mobile telephone, or telephone or data subscription. Such benefits therefore needed to be evaluated on the basis of their ‘true value’ to the recipient. This changed, thanks to the Royal Decree dated 2 November 2017, establishing the following fixed annual costs, applicable as from 1 January 2018:

  • Free provision of a tablet or mobile telephone: 36 euros
  • Free telephone subscription (land line or mobile): 48 euros
  • Free internet connection (fixed or mobile): 60 euros

The latter amount of 60 euros per year shall apply, regardless of how many devices are able to utilise the internet connection. 

Changes were necessary as the existing fixed fees (particularly with regard to social security) could not always be considered to be aligned with the market, were no longer realistic and harmonisation was lacking between the various authorities (e.g. between the tax and social security authorities. The above amendment, together with a number of new (lower) fixed fees applicable as from 1 January 2018, now harmonise and clarify the existing rules. 

An important remark is that, in some cases, the amounts must be combined. Therefore, the free provision of a smartphone with a data and telephone subscription will incur a total benefit in kind of 144 euros.

Sometimes no benefit in kind at all

Naturally, if the permitted use of the tools provided by the employer is strictly professional, no benefit in kind should be incurred. Where a system exists whereby the employee pays all private use (registered in a realistic system), then it is not necessary to declare benefit in kind. In the event of such split billing, the employer will only fund the costs as long as these do not exceed a clear limit. Any amount above the limit is then charged directly to the person receiving the benefit.

The latter point has recently been confirmed in a response from the Minister of Finance to a question raised in parliament. Furthermore, the minister not only confirmed that, in such cases, there is no taxable benefit in kind on the subscription and internet connection, but also that no benefit should be charged for the device supplied. This has also been confirmed in the past by the ruling committee – before the creation of fixed fees. It is argued that, in the aforementioned case, as the employer is no longer funding any private use of the smartphone, there should also be no taxable benefit on the device itself

This is a somewhat surprising, but clear confirmation, which is certainly to the advantage of the tax payer and therefore can only be celebrated. 

The amount beyond which any use is considered to be private (6.5 euros call costs and 1.5 gigabytes per month in the case that was submitted to the minister) does still need to be established in accordance with serious standards and criteria and, as such, must be confirmed as realistic. Indeed, in the past, the ruling committee have already determined the contrary, that a particular law could not be considered as ‘realistic’, when the facts demonstrated that in the past year the set amounts were not exceeded by the employees and therefore no charge was made for private use.

The new rules for VAT processing of vouchers
The wonderful world of VAT and vouchers
Vouchers are a very popular marketing tool. There are various types of vouchers: discount vouchers issued by a manufacturer, redeemable at any sales outlet in Belgium, discount coupons issued free of charge by retailers, vouchers where you can get a newly launched article free of charge, gift vouchers that can be redeemed for a whole range of products or services, electronic vouchers, etc. Are yo
A showpiece, or rather a sticking plaster for a broken arm?
The Belgian fiscal consolidation regime
The general intention with the introduction of a fiscal consolidation regime was clear, namely to put the Belgian tax system back in a positive light. After all, many of our neighbouring countries have had a system of fiscal consolidation in place for many years, and Belgium consequently scored badly on this point when international groups were looking to choose an investment location. The ques
The long-term lease revival
Superficies as stealth usufruct?
A noteworthy judgement was recently handed down by the Court of Appeal of Brussels regarding the taxation of overly cheap accession in the case of superficies (23 January 2019). In the past, a number of rulings had already been made on this subject (see, inter alia, Court in Ghent of 31 October 2017). The tax authorities are clearly keen to see the end of the right of superficies, and the two judg
'Paulian claim' to the rescue
Thwarting the taxman by rejecting an inheritance: is it possible?
In inheritance law, multiple heirs can have a statutory inheritance claim. As such, they are entitled to a minimum share of the inheritance. Since the new inheritance law, it is possible to freely dispose of half of one's assets. This is called the available part. If the available part is exceeded by donations, the statutory heirs may request the reduction. Through the reduction, the statutory hei
Appointing a Belgian fiscal representative is necessary
BREXIT: Important VAT news for UK companies with a Belgian VAT number
The Belgian VAT authorities confirmed that UK companies with a direct Belgian VAT registration need to appoint a Belgian fiscal representative for VAT purposes before 30/03/2019. This is in case of a no-deal Brexit on that date. The VAT administration will allow these UK companies to maintain their current Belgian VAT number, also after appointing a fiscal representative for VAT purposes. 
Legally most correct solution
Successive usufruct: The Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel) confirms the method of levying the registration duties
On 10 December 2018, a remarkable position was published on the Vlabel website (Position no 18083 of 26 November 2018). The real estate tax system is becoming more and more sophisticated with more (tax) advantages. The question must therefore be asked whether the well-known "simple" usufruct will not be partially replaced by transactions with a double or successive usufruct. In the area of registr
From 1 January 2019
New Flemish Lease Decree
On 24 October 2018, the Flemish Parliament approved the new Flemish Lease Decree. In our newsletter of 26 October 2017, we already hinted at the changes that this new decree will bring about. One of the most important changes remains the decree's broad scope. On the one hand, extensive regulations are provided for the rental of a house intended as a main residence. What is new here is that the ter
Confirmed in writing to our office
Confirmed: both usufructuary and bare owner are to be included in the UBO register
The Belgian Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) register went live on 31 October 2018. On the basis of the legal texts and the explanatory notes, as ultimate beneficiary/ies of companies, the natural person(s) who directly or indirectly hold(s) a sufficient percentage of the voting rights or of the ownership interest in this company must first be notified. A holding of at least 25% is an indication of
The advantage is a taxable benefit
Fiches and withholding tax on benefits granted by foreign companies
Should payments received from a foreign company be subject to withholding tax and should this be declared on a fiche? At the moment, the answer to this question is negative in most situations, but this is set to change. A new draft law dated 18 December 2018 provides for the introduction of a tax fiction that requires the (Belgian) employer of the beneficiary employee not only to withhold withh
The requirement to register gets a broader scope
More entrepreneurs must register with the Crossroads Bank for Enterprises (CBE)
Under the aim of creating a more attractive business climate, changes were made to the existing company law. In that context, the legislator has done away with the ‘trader’ concept, replacing it with the umbrella term ‘enterprise. Besides forming the basis for the rules of the Code of Economic Law, the Judicial Code and the Civil Code, the new enterprise concept also has consequences for reg

Subscribe to our newsletter