Split bill rule can avoid benefit in kind for smartphones

Whenever an employer provides an employee with a free tablet, mobile telephone, telephone or data subscription that may be used for private purposes, this is considered a taxable benefit in kind. Since the beginning of this year there are fixed charges for such benefits, but in some cases it is possible for a benefit to be avoided.

Fixed benefits in kind as from 2018

A fixed amount has been established for most such benefits in kind. However, until recently, there was no fixed fee for the free provision of a tablet, mobile telephone, or telephone or data subscription. Such benefits therefore needed to be evaluated on the basis of their ‘true value’ to the recipient. This changed, thanks to the Royal Decree dated 2 November 2017, establishing the following fixed annual costs, applicable as from 1 January 2018:

  • Free provision of a tablet or mobile telephone: 36 euros
  • Free telephone subscription (land line or mobile): 48 euros
  • Free internet connection (fixed or mobile): 60 euros

The latter amount of 60 euros per year shall apply, regardless of how many devices are able to utilise the internet connection. 

Changes were necessary as the existing fixed fees (particularly with regard to social security) could not always be considered to be aligned with the market, were no longer realistic and harmonisation was lacking between the various authorities (e.g. between the tax and social security authorities. The above amendment, together with a number of new (lower) fixed fees applicable as from 1 January 2018, now harmonise and clarify the existing rules. 

An important remark is that, in some cases, the amounts must be combined. Therefore, the free provision of a smartphone with a data and telephone subscription will incur a total benefit in kind of 144 euros.

Sometimes no benefit in kind at all

Naturally, if the permitted use of the tools provided by the employer is strictly professional, no benefit in kind should be incurred. Where a system exists whereby the employee pays all private use (registered in a realistic system), then it is not necessary to declare benefit in kind. In the event of such split billing, the employer will only fund the costs as long as these do not exceed a clear limit. Any amount above the limit is then charged directly to the person receiving the benefit.

The latter point has recently been confirmed in a response from the Minister of Finance to a question raised in parliament. Furthermore, the minister not only confirmed that, in such cases, there is no taxable benefit in kind on the subscription and internet connection, but also that no benefit should be charged for the device supplied. This has also been confirmed in the past by the ruling committee – before the creation of fixed fees. It is argued that, in the aforementioned case, as the employer is no longer funding any private use of the smartphone, there should also be no taxable benefit on the device itself

This is a somewhat surprising, but clear confirmation, which is certainly to the advantage of the tax payer and therefore can only be celebrated. 

The amount beyond which any use is considered to be private (6.5 euros call costs and 1.5 gigabytes per month in the case that was submitted to the minister) does still need to be established in accordance with serious standards and criteria and, as such, must be confirmed as realistic. Indeed, in the past, the ruling committee have already determined the contrary, that a particular law could not be considered as ‘realistic’, when the facts demonstrated that in the past year the set amounts were not exceeded by the employees and therefore no charge was made for private use.

Property planning finds itself in turbulent waters
Valuation of a usufruct: in complete (r)evolution?
Much has been said and written in the past few years about the valuation of a usufruct and where the fiscal shoe pinches. An overview of valuation problems, current trends and a look at future property planning is provided below. Valuation of a usufruct Valuation of a usufruct: a changing world Usufruct is one of the oldest property rights known and was already applied in Roman times. Usufr
This difference in treatment needs to be corrected
Benefit in kind on immovable property: tax authority abides by the court ruling (for now)
The Federal Public Service Finance published Circular 2018/C/57 on 15 May 2018 on the flat-rate valuation of the benefit in kind for providing an immovable property or a part of an immovable property free of charge to employees or managers. The flat-rate estimate of these benefits is laid down by the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code 1992 (RD/BITC 92). The Courts of Appeal of Ghent and
The 'use and enjoyment" rules explained
Freight transport and closely associated services: new rules clarified in a circular
On 31 October 2017, (previous) Royal Decree No 57, which deals with the freight transport services Department and related services, was replaced by a new RD which came into force on 23 November 2017. It clarifies the former RD in part while introducing a new rule. In order to clarify and discuss the (new) rules, the tax authorities published an administrative circular in this regard on 31 May 2018
Guidelines
Substantial changes in the obligations for partnerships
The Company Law Reform, published on 27 April 2018, is making a number of changes in the Companies Code and the Code of Economic Law. These new regulations will enter into force on 1 November 2018. A few rules will also change for partnerships. Although some clarifications will still be published, we would already like to provide the following guidelines. Changes in the Companies Code A first
Quickly detect system risks
Without a Legal Entity Identifier your company will not be trading on the stock market in 2018
  As from 3 January 2018, every legal entity that buys or sells financial instruments must have a Legal Entity Identifier or LEI. Legal Entity Identifier A LEI is a 20-digit alpha-numeric code enabling quick identification of legal entities that are active on the (international or local) financial markets. The LEI enables regulators to quickly detect system risks. Registrati
A summary of the main points
Immovable property leases to include VAT
  Although currently there is just a draft bill on this issue, which obviously can be subject to change in the meantime, we would like to summarize the main points of the upcoming revolution in the VAT landscape: immovable property leases may become subject to VAT. History Until recently, immovable property leases have – in principle – been exempt from VAT (section 44, paragr
UBO = Ultimate Beneficial Owner
The UBO register: new disclosure requirements planned for your company’s administrative body
As a result of the insertion of sections 14(1) and 14(2) into the Belgian Companies Code all companies must in the future obtain adequate, accurate and current information about their ‘ultimate beneficial owners’ (UBOs) and record the data in the new ‘UBO Register’, a central register containing data about companies and the natural persons behind them. In view of the unwavering atte
Introduction of the matrimonial property law
Is it the end of the final set-off clause or is it getting new life?
  Much has been said about the final set-off clause in recent years. After the Court of Cassation in 2017 ruled in favour of the tax payer that the claim was deductible in the scope of the payable succession duties, the Flemish regulator decided to come to the aid of the tax authorities by changing the law. What is a final set-off clause and how does it work? Many spouses married un
Also the unequal treatment gets reviewed
Benefit in kind for housing: how to anticipate the higher or lower scenario?
Discrimination as regards the benefit in kind for housing has been highlighted on several occasions. Specifically, it relates to the unequal treatment of the same benefits, whether in terms of provision by a sole trader or provision by a legal person. In the most common cases, the benefit arising from being a limited company is almost four times more expensive taxation-wise than the benefit arisin
To reduce the financial burden
Start-up reduction on social security contributions for self-employed persons
The start-up reduction was part of the 'Summer agreement' and took effect on 1 April 2018. With this initiative, the government intends to reduce the financial burden of self-employed persons in start-ups, who often have low incomes at the start of their activity, thereby stimulating entrepreneurship.  Which self-employed persons are eligible?  The reduction measure applies to all se

Subscribe to our newsletter