Help, soon my legal entity type will no longer exist!

The WVV ("CAC") is on its way
On 4 June 2018, the "draft legislation introducing the Companies and Associations Code" was filed in the Chamber, marking one of the most far-reaching corporate law reforms since the introduction of the coordinated laws on commercial companies on 30 November 1935.

This extensive reform of corporate law corresponds with the introduction of the “Companies and Associations Code” (abbreviated as "WVV” - in Dutch “Wetboek van Vennootschappen en Verenigingen”) and is based on three key aspects: (i) a thorough simplification, (ii) a far-reaching flexibilisation, and (iii) an adaptation to a number of changes from the European level.

Limiting the number of legal entity types

In the context of the thorough simplification of corporate law, the number of (Belgian) legal entity types will be reduced dramatically. After all, the current Companies Code has 18 legal entity types (including the European legal entities).

The new legislation provides only 4 basic types:

  • The partnership;
  • The private company ("BV");
  • The limited liability company ("NV");
  • The cooperative company ("CV").

Limited companies and partnerships in the WVV
The partnership will become the most basic type of unlimited company that can exist both with or without a legal personality.

A partnership having legal personality can be modelled as a general partnership ("VOF") if it has unlimited partners or as a limited partnership ("CommV") if it has at least one silent partner.

In areas where the three remaining limited companies (BV, NV, CV) have a strongly overlapping scope in practice, they will be reinforced in terms of their distinguishing features.

The BV will becomes the most essential type of limited company for SMEs.

Which legal entity types will disappear
With the introduction of the WVV, the following types of legal entities will disappear:

The temporary and the silent trading company
The partnership can have both a quiet and a temporary character under the new law. As a result, there is no further need for a separate legal entity type.

The cooperative company (with unlimited liability (CVOA))
The CVOA is increasingly rare under the current law. The cooperative company with limited liability will continue to exist, but will only be able to be used by companies that effectively propagate cooperative principles, which means that, as their main objective, they exist to meet the needs of shareholders or to develop the socio-economic activities of shareholders. If one wishes to establish a company with a legal personality, but with unlimited liability of its partners, one must revert to the VOF under the new legislation.

The partnership limited by shares (Comm. VA)
The main reason for establishing a Comm. VA under the current laws is to create a limited company whose shares are freely transferable, but where a seemingly irremovable statutory director/managing partner can be appointed. Due to the flexibilisation of the NV and especially of the BV, the characteristics of a Comm. VA can be perfectly achieved under these new legal entity types.

The economic partnership (ESV)
An ESV is a company that can be established by contract for a definite or indefinite period of time, by natural persons or legal entities, with the sole purpose of facilitating or developing the economic activities of its members, or to improve or increase their results. The objective of this rare legal entity type can be perfectly realised as a VOF, a CV or a non-profit organisation (VZW).

The agricultural company
The agricultural company strongly resembles a VOF or a CommV, and is mainly used because it provides access to certain civil rights (e.g. leaseholds) and tax benefits. Under the new legislation, the agricultural company will disappear as a separate legal entity type, but the VOF, the CommV, the BV and the CV can be recognised as an agricultural company to provide continued access to the aforementioned benefits.

The company with social purpose
At present, a company can assume the status of a company with a social purpose if it meets certain conditions. In the new WVV, this possibility will only be open to a CV, which can request recognition as a social enterprise.

Ratification
The new WVV will most likely take effect on 1 January 2019. After ratification of the new code, no new companies can be incorporated under or converted into a discontinued legal entity type.

For existing companies with an abolished legal entity type, a transitional arrangement will apply until 1 January 2024. For these companies the current Companies Code will continue to apply until the point in time that they are converted into another legal entity type, with the exception of a number of mandatory provisions from the new WVV that will apply immediately.

If they have not yet been converted into another legal entity type by 1 January 2024, they will be converted automatically by operation of law as follows:

  • The Comm. VA will become a limited liability company (‘NV’) with a sole director;
  • The agricultural company will become a VOF, or if there are silent partners, a CommV;
  • The ESV will become a VOF;
  • The CVOA will become a VOF;
  • The CVBA that does not meet the definition of a cooperative company will become a BV.

Sanctions
The members of the executive bodies of companies that are automatically converted in this way must convene a general meeting within six months of this conversion with a view to amending the articles of association. They are personally and severally liable for the damage suffered by the company or third parties due to non-compliance with this obligation.

Valuation of usufruct
Now also a witch hunt when usufruct is sold?
In previous editions, we have already written about the valuation of usufruct when purchasing property, but recently there have also been regular reports of checks on the valuation of usufruct when reselling. However, up until now, the case law has followed the viewpoint of the taxpayer. Brief description For several years, there has been a lot of controversy regarding the valuation of usufruc
Vlabel is using conciliatory language
Has the decrease in Flemish sales duty led to an increase in the costs for purchases of usufruct?
The decrease in sales duty: also for split purchase usufruct-bare ownership The recent drop in the rate (to 7.00%) for purchases of family homes comes with a number of conditions. For example, the purchaser must be a natural person. Following some uncertainty, it was subsequently confirmed that, in the event of a split purchase of such a property by a company for the usufruct and the bare owner f
The labour market of the future
Earn (on the side) flexibly and untaxed
There are three legal social statuses in Belgium, (i) employee, (ii) self-employed and (iii) civil servant. However, the question is often asked whether these classifications are still relevant to the rapidly evolving labour market in which flexibility is key and many people opt for a 'freelance status' or wish to combine several statuses. Voka has already called for a debate on the labour mark
Is there a notification requirement for your organisation?
Well begun is half done: Prepare your organisation for the go-live of the UBO register.
The register of ultimate beneficiaries (the "UBO register") will go live on 31 October 2018. In one of our previous newsletters we presented an overview of the general framework of the UBO register. The Royal Decree of 30 July 2018, published in the Belgian Official Journal of 14 September 2018, explains this register in detail. We’ve reviewed what your organisation needs to take into account.&n
One of the action points of the ATAD Directive
Impact of the implementation of the Belgian CFC legislation: the de facto tightening of transfer pricing rules?
From 1 January 2019 (fiscal year 2020), the newly introduced CFC rule will come into effect in Belgium, due to the implementation of the ATAD directive1. This new legislation must be interpreted within the broader framework of the Summer Agreement and the reforms within Belgian corporate taxation, which, like the CFC legislation, have resulted in part from the heavily discussed implementation of t
Brexit, e-commerce & VAT action plan are discussed
Pending changes in the area of international VAT
In the previous edition we discussed the expected changes in terms of VAT at a national level. In this article we will briefly consider the VAT changes that are expected internationally.                Brexit  In principle, on 30 March 2019, the ‘Brexit’ will finally be a reality. The United Kingdom will no lon
A brief summary
What should be expected in relation to (national) VAT?
Despite the fact that many of us are still in summer (holiday) mode, this article is going to focus on the VAT changes that we could expect in the not-too-distant future. It will provide a brief summary. For a more in-depth examination, you can always contact our VAT team.  Vouchers (1 January 2019)  In June 2016, Europe set out the VAT process for vouchers (Directive (EU)2016/1065 o
The FAQ contains no fewer than thirty-one questions
FAQ published regarding the Innovation Income Deduction (IID)
On 26 July 2018, the FPS Finance used Fisconet - you can registrate for free to consult the list of FAQ - to publish the long-awaited list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding the Innovation Income Deduction. Since the law of 9 February 2017, introducing the Innovation Income Deduction, there now follows the first additional comments concerning the legal provisions of Art. 20
Depends on the nature and frequency of the violation
Fine levels set for non-compliance with transfer pricing documentation obligation
From tax year 2017 and, more specifically, the implementation of the mandatory transfer pricing documentation obligation, there was an immediate indication that, from a second violation of non-compliance with the transfer pricing obligations, a fine of between 1,250 EUR and 25,000 EUR (Article 445, §3 Income Tax Code 1992) could be imposed. The scales of the administrative fines and their appl
What are the consequences?
Vlabel overruled by the Council of State in the case of split acquisition and registration of bare ownership and usufruct
After years of dispute between taxpayers and the Flemish Tax Office (Vlabel), the Council of State has quashed Vlabel's position on split acquisition and split registration. Here below we explain where the problem lies and what the consequences of the decision of the Council of State are in practice. The problematic situations Two kinds of situations were targeted by the position of Vlabel. Th

Subscribe to our newsletter