The all-powerful manager of a civil-law partnership: was it always a fiction?

The civil-law partnership has long been a popular control structure among wealth planners. In many cases, donors do not want to give up their assets entirely, and still want to retain some control over what they donate. Definitely in cases of transfers of family companies, the donors (often parents or family members) still want to retain control over the course of the business. 

The advantages of setting up a civil-law partnership structure
For various reasons, the civil-law partnership is considered a suitable instrument. Firstly, the assets contributed by parents can easily be transferred by donating the shares of the partnership. Secondly, the dual technique of managing the company and retaining usufruct on the donated shares allows parents to retain a certain amount of control and revenue. Another attractive advantage is that it is a simple private contract with few formalities and binding legal rules. For example, no intervention on the part of a notary is necessary, and the contribution, board of directors and duration can all be freely arranged. In addition, the civil-law partnership is not subject to corporation tax as it is fiscally transparent, which is often interesting from a tax perspective.

However, the consequences of this structure (incorporation of the partnership, contribution and donation of the shares) should not be underestimated. The parent-donor-manager cannot act as though these transactions never took place, still fully imposing their authority on the contributed assets. Disregarding the established structure in this way can cause problems both in assessing the donation and in terms of the management of the partnership.

Curtailment of management power by the judiciary?
The ruling of the Ghent Court of Appeal of 5 September 2018 concerns the management of the partnership. Although not all the facts of this case are known, we have been informed that it involved a manager who managed the partnership in his own interest, and not in the interest of the common special-purpose assets created by the contribution. The other partners (in this case the children) demanded that the manager's (their father) power to manage the business be withdrawn, and the court agreed with them. Although the power of control of the manager-donor is often set out in very broad terms in the articles of association of the civil-law partnership, it should not be forgotten that the civil-law partnership is and remains a purpose-bound asset. Consequently, not only does the manager of the partnership need to take his own interests into account when managing the partnership, but also needs to take the interests of the other partners into account. The Court of Appeal clearly states that (translation) "it is possible that the statutory manager may exercise his mandate in such a way that there is a risk that the interests of the company (including the proper management of the common special-purpose assets) may be undermined in the process".

The Court of Appeal presumably considered the arguments of the partners convincing enough, because it appointed a provisional administrator who has to take over the management of the civil-law partnership in the interest of all the partners. For the time being, it is not yet clear to what extent the manager had disregarded his obligations vis-à-vis the other partners. Some people now claim that a manager is "no longer the Sun King". It would be more accurate to say that managers never have been the Sun King (although some advisers may have praised managers as though they were). We can therefore say that this ruling does not fundamentally change anything, and is certainly no reason to panic. The ruling simply confirms that a manager must manage the contributed (and donated) assets in the interest of all partners, and not merely in his own interest. So nothing new in fact.

As such, the civil-law partnership remains an excellent structure for wealth planning. In most cases, the manager will exercise his authority reasonably. The courts will also exercise caution with the option of appointing a provisional administrator. This ruling makes it clear to everyone that the rules of the partnership must be respected: management must be exercised correctly in the interest of all partners. If you follow the rules of the game, you have nothing to fear! Since an appeal was lodged against this ruling in Cassation, it will clearly not be the end of the discussion .....

Tax & Legal Services
Moving goods to another Member State – will we see a more flexible attitude in respect of the formalities?
In the wake of the ruling in favour of VAT deductions based on a non-compliant invoice, the Court of Justice has once again ruled on a case where, in the event of the non-reporting of the VAT identification number in the Member State of destination on the transfer document, the VAT exemption in the Member State of origin cannot be refused (C.o.J. 20 October 2016, case C-24/15, Plöckl). 1. The
Tax & Legal Services
Year-end tax optimisations series – advance payments
We are once again entering the final month of the year, and for most companies that also means the last month of the financial year. This is when there is still enough time to optimise numerous issues before the financial year effectively concludes. In this series we will shed light on a number of potential techniques for tax optimisation. 1. Introduction – ratio legis of advance payments
Tax & Legal Services
Year-end tax optimisations series – Tax Shelter for audiovisual works
We are once again entering the final month of the year, and for most companies that also means the last month of the financial year. This is when there is still enough time to optimise numerous issues before the financial year effectively concludes. In this series we will shed light on a number of potential techniques for tax optimisation. 1. Introduction The film industry is booming in Belg
Tax & Legal Services
Which gift vouchers can you use to give your employee a tax-free bonus?
Many companies wish to reward their employees periodically for their hard work or on occasion of a special event. But in view of the high wage costs, the various available forms of gift vouchers are an oft-used alternative. Below we provide an overview of the various options. 1. General taxation regime for gift vouchers Gift vouchers (gift vouchers, surprise vouchers, cinema vouchers, book
Tax & Legal Services
New aspects and points for attention in respect of the social insurance regulations for self-employed persons
A number of interesting amendments have been introduced in respect of the social insurance regulations for self-employed persons which we would like to inform you of. 1. Deadline for joining To date, new self-employed persons were required to join a social insurance fund no later than on the date upon which the independent activities commenced. Since 01 July 2016, they have been required
Tax & Legal Services
Will the EU now permit VAT deductions on the basis of non-compliant purchase invoices?
In a recent ruling the Court of Justice adopted the viewpoint that the tax authorities cannot refuse the right to deduct VAT just because certain required information was not stated on an invoice. In this particular case the authorities had all the information required to check whether all material conditions for exercising this right of deduction were met. 1. Principle: no compliant invoice -
Tax & Legal Services
The 2016 budgetary measures: has the mountain given birth to a mouse?
The budgetary negotiations were a tough nut to crack, but the government finally reached consensus on the 2016 budget. The budget savings of 3.006 billion euros entails measures that are 70 percent cuts, 20 percent new revenue (read: taxes) and 10 percent ‘miscellaneous’. The anticipated reform of the corporation tax, the capital gains tax on shares and the use of savings to support SMEs an
Tax & Legal Services
The “home services bonus”: let your employer pay for your cleaner or gardener
In recent years, employers and employees alike have been seeking alternative forms of remuneration that are advantageous for both parties; ways to optimise the level of return and benefit for the employee and at the same time minimise the burden of the employer’s social security contributions. A recently-developed form of extra-legal remuneration, which has been checked with both tax and soci
Tax & Legal Services
New VAT scheme for cafeterias from 2017!
Certain exempt taxpayers running not-for-profit operations are already covered by the “cafeteria scheme”, which involves a VAT tolerance allowing the cafeteria to be included under the taxpayer’s VAT-exempt activity. But from 2017 the terms of this administrative scheme are changing. 1. Context of the issue Supplying food and beverages for consumption on the premises (i.e. operating a
Tax & Legal Services
Is a benefit in kind for a residence unreasonable? A step in the right direction.
Much has been written in recent years about calculating the benefit in kind for private use of a residence provided by a company. Especially since the benefit in kind for private use of a residence was almost doubled in 2012. 1. Flat-rate determination of the benefit in kind Since 2012, in accordance with Article 18(2)(2) of the Royal Decree implementing the Income Tax Code (KB/WIB), the ben

Subscribe to our newsletter